Literature DB >> 20212970

Care of the umbilical cord after birth: A limited review of recent literature.

C R Walker1.   

Abstract

A 1992 meta-analysis did not find enough evidence to recommend one method of umbilical cord care as the 'best'. However, certain agents were deemed acceptable including triple dye, silver sulfadiazine and antibiotic ointments. In this paper, the authors sought to discover whether there was now evidence to support one specific method of cord care over others for the prevention of bacterial infection. After a limited search of the English language literature published in the past 10 years, little evidence was found to suggest that treatments to sterilize or speed up the drying of the umbilical cord were either routinely necessary or efficacious. Results from nine studies are summarized in this paper.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial colonization; Cord care; Cord separation; Omphalitis; Umbilical cord

Year:  1999        PMID: 20212970      PMCID: PMC2828202          DOI: 10.1093/pch/4.2.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Child Health        ISSN: 1205-7088            Impact factor:   2.253


  9 in total

1.  Cord care appraised.

Authors:  H Mansell
Journal:  Aust Nurses J       Date:  1990-09

2.  Hydrophobic material in routine umbilical cord care and prevention of infections in newborn infants.

Authors:  A Meberg; R Schøyen
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  1990

3.  Cleaning solutions and bacterial colonization in promoting healing and early separation of the umbilical cord in healthy newborns.

Authors:  J M Medves; B A O'Brien
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

4.  Time of separation of the umbilical cord: a comparative study of treatment with alcohol and Rikospray.

Authors:  N Naor; P Merlob; A Litwin; E Wielunksy
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Antiseptic cord care reduces bacterial colonization but delays cord detachment.

Authors:  C Ronchera-Oms; C Hernández; N V Jimémez
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  A comparative study of neonates' umbilical cord management .

Authors:  L Barclay; A Harrington; R Conroy; R Royal; J LaForgia
Journal:  Aust J Adv Nurs       Date:  1994 Mar-May       Impact factor: 0.647

7.  What cord care--if any?

Authors:  I G Verber; F S Pagan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Staphylococcus aureus still colonizes the untreated neonatal umbilicus.

Authors:  M Watkinson; A Dyas
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  A comparison of umbilical cord treatment in the control of superficial infection.

Authors:  O Smales
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1988-07-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.