Literature DB >> 2284579

Hydrophobic material in routine umbilical cord care and prevention of infections in newborn infants.

A Meberg1, R Schøyen.   

Abstract

In a prospective randomized study 2 different regimens for umbilical disinfection in newborn infants were tested: (i) a bandage of hydrophobic material (Sorbact; n = 1,213), and (ii) daily cleansing with 0.5% chlorhexidine in 70% ethanol (n = 1,228). Infections were registered in the nursery as well as after discharge until 6 weeks of age, and bacterial cultures taken from infected areas. A total of 410 infections were registered in 377 (15.4%) of the 2,441 infants. Total infection rates of 16.3 and 14.6% were found in the hydrophobic material group and the chlorhexidine-ethanol group respectively (p greater than 0.05). No differences were found between the groups in infection rates in the nursery (8.9 vs. 8.7%), after discharge (7.4 vs. 5.9%), or in rates of different types of infections (conjunctivitis, pyoderma, paronychia, omphalitis) (p greater than 0.05). 536 strains were isolated. 498 (92.9%) were gram-positive, 45 (8.4%) gram-negative, and 7 (1.3%) candida strains. 229 (55.9%) were Staphylococcus aureus strains. No differences were found between the two groups concerning distribution of the different strains isolated. Separation of the umbilical cord occurred significantly later in the hydrophobic material group than in the chlorhexidine-ethanol group (6.2 +/- 2.2 vs. 5.8 +/- 2.1 days; p less than 0.05). Hydrophobic material does not prevent infections more effectively compared to 0.5% chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2284579     DOI: 10.3109/00365549009027128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0036-5548


  5 in total

Review 1.  Safety and impact of chlorhexidine antisepsis interventions for improving neonatal health in developing countries.

Authors:  Luke C Mullany; Gary L Darmstadt; James M Tielsch
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Care of the umbilical cord after birth: A limited review of recent literature.

Authors:  C R Walker
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 3.  Topical umbilical cord care at birth.

Authors:  J Zupan; P Garner; A A A Omari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

Review 4.  Role of antimicrobial applications to the umbilical cord in neonates to prevent bacterial colonization and infection: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Luke C Mullany; Gary L Darmstadt; James M Tielsch
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 5.  Umbilical cord antiseptics for preventing sepsis and death among newborns.

Authors:  Aamer Imdad; Resti Ma M Bautista; Kathlynne Anne A Senen; Ma Esterlita V Uy; Jacinto Blas Mantaring; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-05-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.