Application of the phosphoramidate ProTide approach to the antiviral drug ribavirin.

Ribavirin is a nucleoside analogue with broad antiviral activity. Here we report the synthesis and biological evaluation of novel ribavirin ProTides designed to deliver the bioactive ribavirin monophosphate into cells. Some of the compounds display activity similar to the parent nucleoside against a range of viruses. Enzymatic, cell lysate and preliminary modeling studies have been performed to investigate the lack of enhancement of potency by the ProTides, and these indicate a failure at the final, amino acid cleavage step in the ProTide activation process, leading to inefficient release of the nucleoside monophosphate. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Introduction

Ribavirin (1-β-d-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-n>an class="Chemical">carboxamide) (1, Fig. 1 ) is a nucleoside analogue with antiviral activity against a number of DNA and RNA viruses in vitro and in vivo. Ribavirin has been approved for the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus and forms part of the only approved combination therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCVa) infection. The agent is converted into its 5′-monophosphate form (RMP) by intracellular phosphorylation mediated by adenosine kinase, followed by further phosphorylation to the di- and triphosphate (RDP and RTP). Its antiviral mode of action is not completely understood and, depending on the virus examined, several mechanisms have been proposed: (i) RMP inhibits the cellular enzyme inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), leading to reduced GTP pools,5, 6 which may play a synergistic role in promoting the incorporation of ribavirin into viral RNA; (ii) RTP inhibits viral RNA synthesis by inhibition of the viral polymerase, (iii) 5′-capping of viral mRNAs is blocked by inhibition of the viral 2′-O-methyltransferase (by RTP) or viral guanylyl transferase (by RMP), (iv) incorporation of ribavirin into this 5′-cap impairs their function and (v) when incorporated into viral RNA, ribavirin induces an accumulation of mutations, which, if lethal, impede viral replication (so called ‘error catastrophy’). Finally, ribavirin has been attributed diverse immunomodulatory activities.11, 12 Whatever the precise mechanism, it is clear that phosphorylation of ribavirin to the mono- and perhaps triphosphate forms are crucial for its antiviral activity. In at least some human cell types, formation of the monophosphate by adenosine kinase was shown to be the rate-limiting step in the activation pathway.

Figure 1

Structure of ribavirin.

Strupan class="Chemical">cture of pan class="Chemical">ribavirin.

In order to bypass the phosphorylation of antiviral nucleoside analogues, several strategies have been introdun>an class="Chemical">ced, including the aryloxy phosphoramidate ProTide technology, which our laboratories have introduced. The aim of this concept is to synthesize lipophilic prodrugs of the nucleoside monophosphate, which, after passive diffusion and enzymatic cleavage, release the free monophosphate at high intracellular concentrations. The structural motif of the prodrug consists of an aryl moiety and an amino acid ester to mask the negative charges of the nucleoside monophosphate. The ProTide approach has been successfully applied to several antiviral nucleosides such as didehydrodideoxythymidine (d4T),14, 15 (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)-2′-deoxyuridine (BVDU), abacavir, 4′-azidouridine, and acyclovir.19, 20

The broad antiviral activity of ribavirin prompted us to study the synthesis and antiviral activity of novel ProTides with the aim to improve and/or broaden its antiviral activity.

Results

Chemistry

The designed compn>ounds carry 1-naphthyl as the aryloxy group, benzyl as the ester function, and varying amino acid moieties including glycine, alanine and phenylalanine.

Ribavirin (1) was obtained (Scheme 1 ) by deprotection using methanolic ammonia of the fully protected nucleoside 4, which was synthesised by condensation of 1,2,3,5-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-ribofuranose (2) and 1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxylate (3) in the presence of bis(p-nitrophenyl)phosphate. In order to improve the poor solubility of ribavirin and to prevent formation of side-products in the following step, the 2′ and 3′ positions of the sugar were protected with a cyclopentylidene group giving the first synthon 5.

Scheme 1

Reagents and conditions: (i) bis(p-nitrophenyl)phosphate, 170 °C, 25 min; (ii) MeOH/NH3, rt, 20 h; (iii) cyclopentanone, HClO4, rt, overnight.

The synthesis of the second synthon, the naphthyloxy-phosphorochloridates, (Scheme 2 ) involves phosphorylation of 1-naphthol with phosphorus oxychloride obtaining the corresponding phosphorodichloridate (6), which was then coupled with the appropriate amino acid benzyl ester salts to give the desired compounds (7–9).

Scheme 2

Reagents and conditions: (i) POCl3, anhydrous TEA, anhydrous Et2O, −78 °C, 30 min then rt, overnight; (ii) appropriate amino acids, anhydrous TEA, anhydrous DCM, −78 °C, 30 min then rt, 2 h.

The final coupling (Sn>an class="Chemical">cheme 3 ) was performed using tert-butyl magnesium chloride (1.0 M solution in tetrahydrofuran) following the Uchiyama procedure to give compounds 10–12 in yields between 15% and 44%. The final products 13–15 were obtained by deprotection of the cyclopentylidene group with 60% formic acid overnight. Yields of the final compounds were between 17% and 63%.

Scheme 3

Reagents and conditions: (i) BuMgCl, anhydrous THF, rt, overnight; (ii) 60% formic acid, rt, overnight.

Antiviral activity

The synthesised compn>ounds were evaluated for their ability to inhibit the repn>lin>an class="Chemical">cation of several viruses. All compounds display increased log  P values compared to ribavirin, as evidenced by C  log  P values (Table 1 ). This may suggest enhanced cellular permeability, at least by passive diffusion. Although active, the ProTides did not show any marked improvement of activity (Table 1) compared to the parent compound, their antiviral concentrations being, at best, in the 14–100 μM range. In the case of respiratory syncytial virus, for which ribavirin is clinically approved, the alanine (13) and glycine (15) ProTides were about threefold less active than ribavirin (1). Compound 13 proved equipotent to ribavirin in inhibiting HCV subgenomic replicon replication and both ProTides proved equipotent to ribavirin for vesicular stomatitis virus. ProTide 13, but not 15, was active against influenza virus (its potency being ∼2-fold lower than that of ribavirin). Compound 15 proved 3–5-fold superior to ribavirin in inhibiting vaccinia virus and Punto Toro virus replication. For all the viruses tested, the phenylalaninyl ProTide 14 had no or borderline activity at the highest concentration tested (100 μM).

Table 1

Antiviral activity of the ribavirin ProTides

Compound	C Log P	Antiviral activity EC50 (μM)							Cytotoxicity (μM)
		Respiratory syncytial virus (HeLa)	Vesicular stomatitis virus (HeLa)	Vaccinia virus (HEL)	HCV (Huh-5–2)	Punta toro virus (Vero)	Influenza A/H3N2 subtype (MDCK)	Influenza B (MDCK)	MCC
13	0.96	45	20	100	68	>100	18	14	>100
14	2.38	>20	>20	100	>70	100	>100	>100	>100
15	0.84	58	20	20	—	58	>20	>20	>100
Ribavirin	−2.85	19	22	112	87 ± 22	183	9	9	>100

Antiviral apan class="Chemical">ctivity of the pan class="Chemical">ribavirin ProTides

All three ProTides were non-toxic to uninfected cells at 100 μM, as was ribavirin. No activity (antiviral EC50 >100 μM) was observed against parainfluenza-3-virus, reovirus-1, sindbis virus, Coxsackie virus B4, HIV-1, HIV-2, herpes simplex virus (type 1, wild-type or thymidine kinase-deficient, or type 2) (HSV), cytomegalovirus, feline corona virus and feline herpes virus (data not shown).

In order to understand the relatively poor activity of these ProTides, which is suggestive of ineffective activation, we performed enzymatic and preliminary molecular modeling studies.

Enzymatic study

The proposed activation men>an class="Chemical">chanism of phosphoramidate prodrugs (Fig. 2 ) involves initial hydrolysis of the carboxylic ester by an esterase or carboxypeptidase type enzyme, and subsequent spontaneous cyclisation with displacement of the aryloxy group, followed by opening of the unstable anhydride ring mediated by water. The last step in the bioactivation is considered to involve the hydrolysis of the P–N bond by a phosphoramidase-type enzyme.23, 24

Figure 2

Proposed activation pathway of the ribavirin ProTides.

Propn>osed activation pathway of the ribavirin ProTides.

An enzymatic study using n>an class="Chemical">carboxypeptidase Y was performed in order to investigate whether ribavirin ProTides can be metabolized under these conditions. Compound 13 was incubated with carboxypeptidase Y in acetone-d 6 and Trizma buffer (pH 7.6) and the enzyme reaction was followed by 31P NMR. The spectra (Fig. 3 ) shows fast metabolism of the starting material (δ P  = 4) to the putative intermediate (18) (δ P  = 7), the reaction being completed within 1.5–2 h. The suggestion that the reaction product is structure (18) is based on two factors. Firstly, while (13) contains a chiral phosphorus and displays two phosphorus signals in the NMR, the (δ P  = 7) product elicits only one signal, suggestive of an achiral phosphorus, as in (18). Secondly, other reports of amino aryl phosphates such as (18) indicate a chemical shift of this magnitude. Close examination of the early (3–30 min) spectra shows a double peak at δ P <5, indicative of a chiral phosphorus and consistent with the proposed activation pathway. This species is considered to be the initial cleavage product (16) on the basis of similar analogues. This enzyme experiment indicates that the first activation step of ProTide 13 is sufficiently efficient.

Figure 3

Carboxypeptidase-mediated cleavage of compound 13, monitored by 31P NMR.

Carboxypn>epn>tidase-mediated cleavage of compound 13, monitored by 31P NMR.

Molecular modeling studies

Preliminary molen>an class="Chemical">cular modeling studies using docking techniques were performed in order to estimate whether ribavirin l-alanine phosphate (18) could be a substrate for the human HINT (I) enzyme, which is considered to catalyze the P–N cleavage reaction. These docking studies, performed by a published method, revealed that ribavirin l-alanine phosphate is not able to bind to the catalytic site of the HINT (I) enzyme in a productive orientation (Fig. 4 ). Namely, the simulation results show that the triazole base is placed in the proximity of the catalytic core, in a position that should be occupied by the phosphoramidate group. This may provide a possible explanation for the poor activity of the ribavirin ProTides.

Figure 4

Docking of compound 18 within the catalytic site of human HINT (I) enzyme.

Metabolism in cell lysates

To further support the modeling study, the prodrugs of ribavirin were chosen for examination of their stability/conversion in concentrated CEM, HeLa and MDCK cell extracts (Fig. 5 ). In case of 13 and 15, the two diastereoisomeric prodrug forms could be distinguished whereas we were unable to separate the isomers of 14 by HPLC.

Figure 5

Cell lysate metabolism of 13–15. For details see experimental section. Conversion of prodrugs 13–15 (upper–lower) in the presence of human T-lymphocyte CEM, human cervix carcinoma HeLa and canine Madin-Darby kidney cell extracts (left to right). The levels of the parent prodrug molecules and their conversion products are given as percentage of total amounts of parent compound and metabolites. The different compounds in the incubation mixtures are shown as their Rt values (retention times) in the HPLC chromatograms.

Cell lysate metabolism of 13–15. For details see experimental sen>an class="Chemical">ction. Conversion of prodrugs 13–15 (upper–lower) in the presence of human T-lymphocyte CEM, human cervix carcinoma HeLa and canine Madin-Darby kidney cell extracts (left to right). The levels of the parent prodrug molecules and their conversion products are given as percentage of total amounts of parent compound and metabolites. The different compounds in the incubation mixtures are shown as their Rt values (retention times) in the HPLC chromatograms.

Interestingly for 13, a different preference of n>an class="Chemical">conversion of the two stereoisomers was observed. One of the isomers (t R: 19.3 min) had almost to be completely converted first to the new metabolite (t R: 20.2 min) (conversion virtually complete (⩾95%)) before the second isomer (t R: 19.0 min) started to be significantly converted to the same metabolite. This trend has also been observed for 15 although the conversion within the time-frame of the experiment was much slower (10% conversion of isomer t R 18.8 min to t R 20.2 after 60 min of the incubation whereas isomer t R 18.5 levels were virtually unaltered).

For prodrug 14 both diastereoisomers (not separable) were most efficiently n>an class="Chemical">converted (80% within 20 min) to metabolite (t R: 20.2 min), followed by 13, whereas 15 was the least efficiently converted prodrug in the presence of the CEM cell extract. A similar trend was observed for the HeLa and MDCK cell extracts. Also, in all cases, the metabolite that accumulated, proved similar for the three different prodrugs (t R: 20.2 min). Only the isomers of 15 converted slowly to two other (most likely corresponding isomeric) metabolites with earlier retention times (t R: 15.3 and 15.6 min) (only observed in MDCK cell extracts) than the parent compound (t R: 18.5 and 18.8 min). In HeLa cell extracts, a less polar metabolite (t R: 19.8 min) of 15 started to be formed (traces of this metabolite have also been observed in the CEM and MDCK incubation experiments).

The fact that the most prominent metabolite of the three prodrugs were of similar nature (t R: 20.2 min) is somewhat unexpen>an class="Chemical">cted since it suggests that the (variable) amino acyl part of the molecule had to be removed while keeping a lipophilicity that is very comparable with the parent prodrugs. The nature of this metabolite is currently unclear. It was also notable that, irrespective of the nature of the prodrug and the origin of the cell extract, in no case were significant levels of ribavirin-MP or polar ribavirin-MP metabolites, or ribavirin itself detected. It is currently unclear why no more polar metabolites are observed upon cell extract incubation, as noted above in the cathepsin assay and as is the case with other purine or pyrimidine nucleotide phosphoramidate ProTides studied in the past under identical experimental conditions. More investigations are required to clarify this issue. However, the lack of liberation of ribavirin monophosphate correlates with the somewhat poor antiviral activity noted here, and supports the modeling predictions on HINT. It may be that the unusual base present in ribavirin precludes the usually efficient monophosphate delivery by the ProTide motif.

Conclusion

A series of novel ribavirin ProTides has been synthesized. No impn>rovement or expansion of the antiviral an>an class="Chemical">ctivity of the parent nucleoside has been obtained. A likely explanation for this lack of activity is the poor activation of the ProTide to the free monophosphate, as evidenced by the cell lysate incubation studies. Our enzyme studies indicated that the first step in the activation of these ribavirin ProTides is efficient, but that subsequent amino acid cleavage to liberate the necessary free 5′-monophosphate appear impeded in this case. Both our preliminary molecular modeling data with the HINT enzyme, and our cell lysate incubation studies support this conclusion.

Experimental section

Biology

The compn>ounds were evaluated against the following viruses: n>an class="Species">herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) strain KOS, thymidine kinase-deficient (TK−) HSV-1 KOS strain resistant to ACV (ACVr), herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) strain G, vaccinia virus Lederle strain, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) strain Long, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), Coxsackie B4, Parainfluenza 3, Reovirus-1, Sindbis, Punta Toro, influenza virus type A (H1N1, H3N2) and type B and feline corona virus. The antiviral, other than anti-HIV, assays were based on inhibition of virus-induced cytopathicity in human embryonic lung (HEL) fibroblasts, African green monkey cells (Vero), human epithelial cervix carcinoma cells (HeLa), Crandel feline kidney cells (CFKC) or Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (MDCK). Briefly, confluent cell cultures in microtiter 96-well plates were inoculated with 100 CCID50 of virus (1 CCID50 being the virus dose to infect 50% of the cell cultures). After a 1–2 h adsorption period, residual virus was removed, and the cell cultures were incubated in the presence of varying concentrations of the test compounds. Viral cytopathicity was recorded as soon as it reached completion in the control virus-infected cell cultures that were not treated with the test compounds. Antiviral activity was expressed as the EC50 or compound concentration required to reduce virus-induced cytopathicity by 50%. Cytotoxicity of the test compounds was expressed as the minimum cytotoxic concentration (MCC) or the compound concentration that caused a microscopically detectable alteration of cell morphology.

To examine inhibition of HIV-induced n>an class="Chemical">cytopathicity in CEM cells, human CEM cell cultures (∼3 × 105  cells mL−1) were infected with ∼100 CCID50 HIV-1(IIIB) or HIV-2(ROD) per mL and seeded in 96-well (200 μL/well) microtiter plates, containing appropriate dilutions of the test compounds. After 4 days of incubation at 37 °C, syncytia formation was examined microscopically in the CEM cell cultures. EC50 values were determined as described above.

Huh 7 n>an class="Chemical">cells carrying subgenomic HCV replicon I389luc-ubi-neo/NS3-3′/5.1 [Huh 5–2] were employed to evaluate the anti-HCV activity and were kindly provided by R. Bartenschlager, (University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany). Cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, Merelbeke, Belgium) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated foetal calf serum (Integro, Zaandam, The Netherlands), 1x MEM Non Essential Amino Acids Solution without l-Glutamine (Gibco), 100 IU of penicillin/mL and 100 μg of streptomycin/ml (Gibco) and 250 μg/mL G418 (Geneticin® Selective Antibiotic, Gibco). Huh 5–2 cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 103 cells per well in 96-well cell culture plates in tissue culture treated white 96-well view plates [(Packard, Canberra, Canada)] in complete DMEM without G418. Antiviral assays were carried out as reported earlier. Read-out for Huh 5–2 cells was a luciferase assay. EC50 was defined as the concentration of compound that reduced the firefly luciferase signal by 50%.

The cytostatic compound concentration was calculated as the CC50, or the compound concentration required to reduce cell proliferation by 50% relative to the number of cells in the untreated controls. CC50 values were estimated from graphic plots of the number of cells (percentage of control) as a function of the concentration of the test compounds.

General

Anhydrous solvents were bought from Aldrich and used without further purifin>an class="Chemical">cation. All reactions were carried out under an argon atmosphere. Reactions were monitored with analytical TLC on Silica Gel 60-F254 precoated aluminium plates and visualised under UV (254 nm) and/or with 31P NMR spectra. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (35–70 μM). Proton (1H), carbon (13C) and phosphorus (31P) NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 500 spectrometer at 25 °C. Spectra were auto-calibrated to the deuterated solvent peak and all 13C NMR and 31P NMR were proton-decoupled. High resolution mass spectra was performed as a service by Birmingham University, using electrospray (ES). CHN microanalysis were performed as a service by the School of Pharmacy at the University of London.

Standard procedure 1: synthesis of phosphorochloridates 7–9

To a stirred solution of 1-naphthyl dichlorophosphate 6 (1.00 mol/equiv) and the appropriate n>an class="Chemical">amino acid ester salt (1.00 mol/equiv) in anhydrous DCM was added, dropwise at −78 °C under an argon atmosphere, anhydrous TEA (2.00 mol/equiv). Following the addition the reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 1 h, then at room temperature for 2 h. Formation of the desired compound was monitored by 31P NMR. After this period the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue triturated with dry diethyl ether. The precipitate was filtered under nitrogen and the solution was concentrated to give an oil. The aryl phosphorochloridates synthesised were purified by flash column chromatography (eluting with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether in different proportions).

Standard procedure 2: synthesis of phosphoramidates 10–12

To a stirring suspension/solution of 5 (1.00 mol/equiv) in anhydrous THF was added dropwise under an n>an class="Chemical">argon atmosphere BuMgCl (2.00 mol/equiv) and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. Then was added dropwise a solution of the appropriate phosphorochloridate (1.10 mol/equiv) in anhydrous THF. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by column chromatography eluting with DCM/MeOH in different proportions.

Synthesis of 1-naphthyl dichlorophosphate (6)

To a stirred solution of 1-naphthol (4.00 g, 27.74 mmol) in dry diethyl ether (60 mL), under an argon atmosphere, were added POCl3 (2.59 mL, 27.74 mmol) and anhydrous TEA (3.87 mL, 27.74 mmol) was then added dropwise, at −78 °C. Following the addition, after 30 min at −78 °C, the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. After 31P NMR, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was triturated with dry diethyl ether. The precipitate was filtered, and the organic phase was removed under reduced pressure to give a yellow oil (95%, 6.91 g). 31P NMR (CDCl3, 202 MHz): δ 3.72. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 8.02–8.00 (1H, m, H-8), 7.81–7.80 (1H, m, H-5), 7.72–7.70 (1H, m, H-4), 7.54–7.45 (4H, m, H-2, H-3, H-6, H-7).

Synthesis of 1-naphthyl(benzoxy-l-alaninyl)-phosphorochloridate (7)

Prepn>ared an>an class="Chemical">ccording to Standard Procedure 1, 6 (6.91 g, 26.48 mmol), l-alanin benzyl ester·HCl (9.30 g, 26.48 mmol), anhydrous TEA (7.40 mL, 52.96 mmol) in anhydrous DCM (100 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 1 h, then at room temperature for 2 h. The crude was purified by column chromatography eluting with ethyl acetate/hexane = 5/5 to give a yellow oil (72%, 7.68 g). 31P NMR (CDCl3, 202 MHz): δ 8.14, 7.88. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 7.99–7.25 (12H, m, Naph, OCH2Ph), 5.15–5.07 (2H, m, CH 2Ph), 4.30–4.23 (1H, m, CHCH3), 1.49–1.46 (3H, m, CHCH 3).

Synthesis of 1-naphthyl(benzoxy-l-phenylalaninyl)-phosphorochloridate (8)

Prepn>ared an>an class="Chemical">ccording to Standard Procedure 1, 6 (0.78 g, 3.00 mmol), L-phenylalanin benzyl ester·HCl (0.87 g, 3.00 mmol), anhydrous TEA (0.84 mL, 6.00 mmol) in anhydrous DCM (20 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 30 min, then at room temperature for 2 h. The crude was purified by column chromatography eluting with ethyl acetate/hexane = 6/4 to give a yellow oil (40%, 0.57 g). 31P NMR (CDCl3, 202 MHz): δ 8.32, 8.19. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 8.04–6.96 (17H, m, Naph, CHCH2 Ph, OCH2 Ph), 5.20–5.11 (2H, m, OCH 2Ph), 4.64–4.52 (1H, m, CHNH), 3.22–3.08 (2H, m, CHCH 2Ph).

Synthesis of 1-naphthyl(benzoxy-glycinyl)-phosphorochloridate (9)

Prepn>ared an>an class="Chemical">ccording to Standard Procedure 1, 6 (0.78 g, 3.00 mmol), glycine benzyl ester·HCl (1.01 g, 3.00 mmol), anhydrous TEA (0.84 mL, 6.00 mmol) in anhydrous DCM (20 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at –78 °C for 30 min, then at room temperature for 2.5 h. The crude was purified by column chromatography eluting with ethyl acetate/hexane = 6/4 to give a yellow oil (73%, 0.85 g). 31P NMR (CDCl3, 202 MHz): δ 8.90. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 8.02–7.30 (12H, m, Naph, OCH2Ph), 5.17 (2H, s, OCH 2Ph), 4.24–4.19 (1H, m, NHCH2), 4.00–3.96 (2H, m, NHCH 2).

Synthesis of 2′,3′-O,O-cyclopentylidene-ribavirin-5′-[1-naphthyl(benzoxy-l-alaninyl)] phosphate (10)

Prepn>ared according to Standard Procedure 2, from 5 (0.20 g, 0.64 mmol) in anhydrous THF (6 mL), BuMgCl (1.0 M THF solution, 1.30 mL, 1.30 mmol), 7 (0.29 g, 0.71 mmol) in anhydrous THF (6 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. After this period the solution was concentrated and the residue purified by column chromatography eluting with DCM/MeOH = 98/2, to give a white solid (32%, 0.14 g). 31P NMR (CDCl3, 202 MHz): δ 3.44, 3.17. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 8.20, 8.19 (1H, 2s, H-5), 7.97–7.18 (12H, m, Naph + OCH2Ph), 5.94 and 5.85 (1H, 2d, H-1′), 5.03–5.00 (2.5H, m, OCH 2Ph, H-2′ of one diastereoisomer), 4.78–4.76 (0.5H, m, H-3′ of one diastereoisomer), 4.69–4.67 (0.5H, m, H-2′ of one diastereoisomer), 4.51–4.49 (0.5H, m, H-3′ of one diastereoisomer), 4.47–4.44 (1H, m, H-4′), 4.25–4.20 (1H, m, H-5′), 4.19–4.11 (1H, m, H-5′), 4.07–4.02, 4.00–3.90 (1H, 2 m, CHCH3), 1.92–1.87 (2H, m, CH2), 1.67–1.52 (6H, m, 3xCH2), 1.30, 1.27 (3H, 2d, CHCH 3).

Synthesis of 2′,3′-O,O-cyclopentylidene-ribavirin-5′-[1-naphthyl(benzoxy-l-phenylalaninyl)] phosphate (11)

Prepn>ared according to Standard Procedure 2, from 5 (0.20 g, 0.64 mmol) in anhydrous THF (6 mL), BuMgCl (1.0 M THF solution, 1.30 mL, 1.30 mmol), 8 (0.34 g, 0.71 mmol) in anhydrous THF (7 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. After this period the solution was concentrated and the residue purified by column chromatography eluting DCM/MeOH = 98/2, to give a white solid (44%, 0.22 g). 31P NMR (CDCl3, 202 MHz): δ 3.30, 3.22. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 8.17, 8.13 (1H, 2s, H-5), 7.90–6.83 (17H, m, Naph, OCH2Ph, CHCH2Ph), 5.91, 5.86 (1H, 2d, H-1′), 4.96–4.94 (2H, m, OCH 2Ph,), 4.92–4.90, 4.73–4.71 (1H, 2 m, H-2′), 4.64–4.63, 4.51–4.49 (1H, 2 m, H-3′), 4.41–4.38 (1H, m, H-4′), 4.30–4.23 (1H, m, CHCH2Ph) 4.08–4.01, 3.90–3.83 (1H, 2 m, H-5′), 3.81–3.76, 3.67–3.63 (1H, m, H-5′), 2.90–2.82 (2H, m, CH 2Ph), 1.95–1.87 (2H, m, CH2), 1.72–1.55 (6H, m, 3xCH2).

Synthesis of 2′,3′-O,O-cyclopentylidene-ribavirin-5′-[1-naphthyl(benzoxy-glycinyl)] phosphate (12)

Prepn>ared according to Standard Procedure 2, from 5 (0.20 g, 0.64 mmol) in anhydrous THF (6 mL), BuMgCl (1.0 M THF solution, 1.30 mL, 1.30 mmol), 9 (0.28 g, 0.71 mmol) in anhydrous THF (6 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. After this period the solution was concentrated and the residue purified by column chromatography eluting with DCM/MeOH = 98/2, to give a white solid (15%, 0.066 g). 31P NMR (CDCl3, 202 MHz): δ 4.39, 4.22. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 8.20, 8.17 (1H, 2s, H-5), 7.99–7.19 (12H, m, Naph+OCH2Ph), 5.94, 5.82 (1H, 2d, H-1′), 5.14–5.11 (0.5H, m, H-2′ of one diastereoisomer), 5.04–5.00 (2H, m, OCH 2Ph) 4.84–4.83 (0.5 H, m, H-3′ of one diastereoisomer), 4.58–4.56 (0.5 H, m, H-2′ of one diastereoisomer), 4.52–4.15 (3.5 H, m, H-3′ of one diastereoisomer, H-4′, H-5′), 3.86, 3.65 (2H, m, NHCH 2), 1.93–1.56 (8H, m, 4 × CH2).

Synthesis of ribavirin-5′-[1-naphthyl(benzoxy-l-alaninyl)] phosphate (13)

A solution of 10 (0.14 g, 0.20 mmol) in 60% formic acid (8 mL) was stirred at room tempn>erature overnight. After this period the solution was n>an class="Chemical">concentrated and the residue purified by column chromatography gradient elution of DCM/MeOH = 96/4 then 95/5, to give a white solid (28%, 0.035 g). 31P NMR (MeOD, 202 MHz): δ 4.21, 4.07. 1H NMR (MeOD, 500 MHz): δ 8.56, 8.54 (1H, 2s, H-5), 8.01–7.99 (1H, m, H-8 Naph), 7.77–7.75 (1H, m, H-6 Naph), 7.64–7.62 (1H, m, H-2 Naph), 7.43–7.15 (9H, m, Naph+ OCH2Ph), 5.84, 5.82 (1H, 2d, H-1′), 4.97–4.89 (2H, m, PhCH 2), 4.40–4.38 (1H, m, H-2′), 4.35–4.17 (4H, m, H-3′, H-4′, H-5′), 3.98–3.89 (1H, m, CHCH3), 1.19–1.16 (3H, m, CHCH 3). 13C NMR (MeOD, 126 MHz): δ 20.23 (d, J  = 7.40, CH3), 20.40 (d, J  = 6.40, CH3), 51.72, 51.82 (CHCH3), 67.67 (d, J  = 5.30, C-5′), 67.91, 67.93 (2s, OCH2Ph), 68.06 (d, J  = 5.60, C-5′) 71.68, 71.80 (2s, C-3′), 76.18, 76.22 (2s, C-2′), 84.61 (d, J  = 8.00, C-4′), 84.69 (d, J  = 9.57, C-4′), 93.79, 93.83 (2s, C-1′), 116.17 (d, J  = 3.20, C-2 Naph), 116.35 (d, J  = 3.30, C-2 Naph) 122.68, 122.81, 125.92, 125.98, 126.50, 127.48, 127.50, 127.75, 127.88, 128.80, 128.83, 129.24, 129.26, 129.52, 129.54 (C-3 Naph, C-4 Naph, C-5 Naph, C-6 Naph, C-7 Naph, C-8 Naph, C-8a Naph, OCH2 Ph), 136.27, 137.20 (C-4a Naph, ‘ipso’ OCH2 Ph), 146.64, 146.68 (2s, C-5), 147.90, 147.96 (2s, ‘ipso’ Naph), 158.62 (C-3), 163.22 (CONH2), 174.59 (d, J  = 5.20, COOCH2Ph), 174.87 (d, J  = 5.09, COOCH2Ph). EI MS = 634.17 (M+Na). Anal. Calcd for C28H30N5O9P·0.4H2O: C, 54.35; H, 5.02; N, 11.32. Found: C, 54.74; H, 5.41; N, 11.40.

Enzymatic procedure

Compn>ound 13 was dissolved in acetone-d 6 (0.15 mL) and Trizma buffer (0.30 mL) and a 31P NMR was recorded (Fig. 3, starting material). Then a solution of carboxypeptidase Y (0.1 mg) in Trizma buffer (0.15 mL) was added and a 31P NMR esperiment was performed recording the experiment every 15 min.

Molecular modeling

All molecular modeling studies were performed on a MacPro dual 2.66 GHz Xeon running Ubntu 8 using Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) 2007.09 and FlexX (Biosolveit FlexX 2.2; BiosolveIT GmbH An der Ziegelei 75, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany; http://www.biosolveit.de/flexx).

Hydrogen atoms were added to the crystal structure (PDB code: 1KPF) and minimised with MOE until a gradient of 0.05 Kcal mol−1  Å−1 was reached, using the MMFF94x forcefield. The partial charges were automatically calculated. Docking experiments were carried out using the MOE GUI of FlexX implemented in MOE. Ribavirn analogue was built in MOE and minimised before the docking.

Prodrug conversion studies in the presence of crude CEM cell extracts

CEM n>an class="Chemical">cell extracts were prepared from 20 × 106 exponentially growing cells, suspended in 1 ml PBS upon sonication (to destroy the integrity of the cells), and subsequent centrifugation (to remove the cell debris). HeLa (32 × 106  cells/mL) and MDCK (54 × 106  cells/mL) cell extracts were similarly prepared after detachment from the culture bottles through trypsin treatment. Six hundred microliter incubation medium (containing 200 μL cell extract, 200 μL PBS and 200 μL test compound at 300 μM in 15% DMSO) was prepared and kept at 37 °C for 0, 20 or 60 min. At each time point 100 μL was withdrawn from the incubation medium and added to 200 μl ice-cold methanol 100% (final concentration: 66%). After 10 min incubation at 4 °C, the reaction mixtures were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min and 150 μL of the supernatants were analyzed by HPLC. The retention times for 13 were 19.0 and 19.3 min (both isomers), for 14 was 21.9 min (isomers not separable) and for 15 were 18.5 and 18.7 min (both isomers). Separation of the parent compounds and conversion products was performed on a reverse phase (Lichrospher-60 RP-select B) column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using following gradient: 2 min 2% acetonitrile (Buffer A); 8 min linear gradient to 20% Buffer A + 80% Buffer B (50 mM NaH2PO4 + 5 mM heptane sulfonic acid); 2 min linear gradient to 25% Buffer A and 75% Buffer B; 2 min linear gradient to 35% Buffer A + 65% Buffer B; 8 min linear gradient to 50% Buffer A and 50% Buffer B; 10 min isocratic flow; 5 min linear gradient to 2% Buffer A + 98% Buffer B; 5 min equilibration by 2% Buffer A + 98% Buffer B.