Literature DB >> 20204982

Self-affirmation moderates effects of unrealistic optimism and pessimism on reactions to tailored risk feedback.

William M P Klein1, Isaac M Lipkus, Sarah M Scholl, Amy McQueen, Jennifer L Cerully, Peter R Harris.   

Abstract

We examined whether self-affirmation would facilitate intentions to engage in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among individuals who were off-schedule for CRC screening and who were categorised as unrealistically optimistic, realistic or unrealistically pessimistic about their CRC risk. All participants received tailored risk feedback; in addition, one group received threatening social comparison information regarding their risk factors, a second received this information after a self-affirmation exercise and a third was a no-treatment control. When participants were unrealistically optimistic about their CRC risk (determined by comparing their perceived comparative risk to calculations from a risk algorithm), they expressed greater interest in screening if they were self-affirmed (relative to controls). Non-affirmed unrealistic optimists expressed lower interest relative to controls, suggesting that they were responding defensively. Realistic participants and unrealistically pessimistic participants who were self-affirmed expressed relatively less interest in CRC screening, suggesting that self-affirmation can be helpful or hurtful depending on the accuracy of one's risk perceptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20204982      PMCID: PMC2888925          DOI: 10.1080/08870440903261970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Health        ISSN: 0887-0446


  23 in total

1.  Correlates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening among male automotive workers.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers; Beatty G Watts; Eun Sul Lee; Barbara C Tilley
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Effects of communicating social comparison information on risk perceptions for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006-06

3.  When focusing on negative and positive attributes of the self elicits more inductive self-judgment.

Authors:  William M P Klein; Matthew M Monin
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-03

4.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Don't derogate this message! Self-affirmation promotes online type 2 diabetes risk test taking.

Authors:  Guido M van Koningsbruggen; Enny Das
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2009-07

6.  Self-affirmation enhances attentional bias toward threatening components of a persuasive message.

Authors:  William M P Klein; Peter R Harris
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-10-30

7.  Self-affirmation and the biased processing of threatening health-risk information.

Authors:  Peter R Harris; Lucy Napper
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-09

8.  Testing the limits of optimistic bias: event and person moderators in a multilevel framework.

Authors:  Peter R Harris; Dale W Griffin; Sandra Murray
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-11

9.  Affirmed yet unaware: exploring the role of awareness in the process of self-affirmation.

Authors:  David K Sherman; Geoffrey L Cohen; Leif D Nelson; A David Nussbaum; Debra P Bunyan; Julio Garcia
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-11

10.  Self-affirmation promotes health behavior change.

Authors:  Tracy Epton; Peter R Harris
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  8 in total

1.  An affective booster moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on behavioral intentions for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; William M P Klein; Laura E Zajac; Stephanie R Land; Bruce S Ling
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-08-18

2.  Paradoxical Effects of Perceived Control on Survival.

Authors:  Judith G Chipperfield; Raymond P Perry; Reinhard Pekrun; Jeremy M Hamm; Frieder R Lang
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Reactions to online colorectal cancer risk estimates among a nationally representative sample of adults who have never been screened.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Constance M Johnson; Sathya Amarasekara; Wei Pan; John A Updegraff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-11-15

4.  A Randomized Study of Values Affirmation to Promote Interest in Diabetes Prevention Among Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes.

Authors:  Susan D Brown; Omid Fotuhi; Christina S Grijalva; Ai-Lin Tsai; Charles P Quesenberry; Jenna L Ritchie; Geoffrey L Cohen; Assiamira Ferrara
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Genetic counseling, genetic testing, and risk perceptions for breast and colorectal cancer: Results from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Erin Turbitt; Megan C Roberts; Jennifer M Taber; Erika A Waters; Timothy S McNeel; Barbara B Biesecker; William M P Klein
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Psychological Impact of Ambiguous Health Messages about COVID-19.

Authors:  Nicolle Simonovic; Jennifer M Taber
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-23

7.  Unrealistic optimism: East and west?

Authors:  Mary Sissons Joshi; Wakefield Carter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-13

8.  The Paradoxical Role of Perceived Control in Late Life Health Behavior.

Authors:  Judith G Chipperfield; Raymond P Perry; Reinhard Pekrun; Petra Barchfeld; Frieder R Lang; Jeremy M Hamm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.