OBJECTIVE: To perform a semiautomated software-based comparison of invasive breast carcinoma dynamic enhancement patterns in MR mammography with histological prognostic factors considering whole lesion volumes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 128 patients with 145 invasive breast carcinomas underwent dynamic MR mammography. Kinetic features from the invasive breast lesions were obtained using commercially available software to automatically assess volume enhancement characteristics of a manually chosen lesion. Findings were compared with histological factors determining tumour aggressiveness (lymph node status, LN; oestrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status; HER-2/neu status; tumour grade) by using nonparametric rank tests and binary logistic regression analysis (BLRA). RESULTS: Volume enhancement characteristics were significantly influenced by LN, ER/PR and HER-2/neu status (P < 0.05). BLRA implied that total lesion and plateau voxel volume were independent predictors of ER/PR and HER-2/neu status. Strongest initial enhancement predicted negative ER/PR, and time to peak of the most suspect curve was inversely correlated with positive LN status. On the other hand, no statistical significance could be observed between histological tumour grading and kinetic features. CONCLUSION: Histopathological criteria associated with poor prognosis lead to significantly more aggressive dynamic enhancement patterns in MR mammography. In this study, higher lesion volumes as well as higher and earlier initial enhancement were independent covariates predicting higher tumour aggressiveness.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a semiautomated software-based comparison of invasive breast carcinoma dynamic enhancement patterns in MR mammography with histological prognostic factors considering whole lesion volumes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 128 patients with 145 invasive breast carcinomas underwent dynamic MR mammography. Kinetic features from the invasive breast lesions were obtained using commercially available software to automatically assess volume enhancement characteristics of a manually chosen lesion. Findings were compared with histological factors determining tumour aggressiveness (lymph node status, LN; oestrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status; HER-2/neu status; tumour grade) by using nonparametric rank tests and binary logistic regression analysis (BLRA). RESULTS: Volume enhancement characteristics were significantly influenced by LN, ER/PR and HER-2/neu status (P < 0.05). BLRA implied that total lesion and plateau voxel volume were independent predictors of ER/PR and HER-2/neu status. Strongest initial enhancement predicted negative ER/PR, and time to peak of the most suspect curve was inversely correlated with positive LN status. On the other hand, no statistical significance could be observed between histological tumour grading and kinetic features. CONCLUSION: Histopathological criteria associated with poor prognosis lead to significantly more aggressive dynamic enhancement patterns in MR mammography. In this study, higher lesion volumes as well as higher and earlier initial enhancement were independent covariates predicting higher tumour aggressiveness.
Authors: Pascal Andreas Thomas Baltzer; Diane M Renz; Petra E Kullnig; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Teri A Longacre; Marguerite Ennis; Louise A Quenneville; Anita L Bane; Ira J Bleiweiss; Beverley A Carter; Edison Catelano; Michael R Hendrickson; Hanina Hibshoosh; Lester J Layfield; Lorenzo Memeo; Hong Wu; Frances P O'malley Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Sonia P Li; Anwar R Padhani; N Jane Taylor; Mark J Beresford; Mei-Lin W Ah-See; J James Stirling; James A d'Arcy; David J Collins; Andreas Makris Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-01-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jeon Hor Chen; Hon J Yu; Christine Hsu; Rita S Mehta; Philip M Carpenter; Min Ying Su Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Aydin Demircioglu; Johannes Grueneisen; Marc Ingenwerth; Oliver Hoffmann; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Elizabeth Morris; Johannes Haubold; Michael Forsting; Felix Nensa; Lale Umutlu Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Natsuko Onishi; Meredith Sadinski; Mary C Hughes; Eun Sook Ko; Peter Gibbs; Katherine M Gallagher; Maggie M Fung; Theodore J Hunt; Danny F Martinez; Amita Shukla-Dave; Elizabeth A Morris; Elizabeth J Sutton Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 6.466