Literature DB >> 6315442

Steroid receptors and prognosis in operable (stage I and II) breast cancer.

J F Stewart, R D Rubens, R R Millis, R J King, J L Hayward.   

Abstract

Four hundred and forty-seven women with operable (TNM stage I or II) breast cancer in whom oestrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PgR) or both receptors had been assayed were studied. Receptor status was independent of axillary nodal status, but infiltrating duct carcinomas that were ER-, PgR- or ER-PgR- were more likely to be anaplastic (P less than 0.001). Four hundred patients with follow-up and uniform treatment were analysed for post-operative disease-free interval (DFI) and survival. No significant difference in DFI existed between patients with ER+ and ER- tumours or PgR+ and PgR- tumours, although there was a trend for longer DFI for ER+ and PgR+. DFI was longer in patients with better-differentiated (grade 1 and 2) tumours than with anaplastic (grade 3) tumours. In patients with ER+ tumours, those with grade 1 and 2 tumours had a longer DFI than those with grade 3 tumours (P less than 0.005). Survival was significantly longer in patients with ER+ tumours compared to those with ER- tumours (P less than 0.001), but there was no such association between tumour PgR and survival. Survival of patients with ER+PgR+ tumours was significantly longer than those with ER-PgR- tumours (P less than 0.025) and, in patients with no evidence of axillary nodal involvement, significantly longer than those with ER+PgR- tumours. Survival in patients with nodal involvement was influenced by histological grade, being longer in those with grade 1 or 2 tumours compared to those with grade 3 tumours. For ER+ tumours, survival was longer in patients with grade 1 or 2 than with grade 3 tumours. These results suggest that steroid receptors significantly affect survival but not DFI. This effect is most closely related to ER content, with relatively little additional information accruing from analysis of PgR. Histological grade influences both DFI and survival, and analysis of both grade and ER content may give a more accurate indication of prognosis in operable breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6315442     DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(93)90007-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-5379


  14 in total

Review 1.  Management of early breast cancer.

Authors:  R D Rubens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-23

Review 2.  Toremifene. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Computer-aided interpretation of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging reflects histopathology of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Tibor Vag; Matthias Dietzel; Sebastian Beger; Christian Freiberg; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Progress in understanding breast cancer: epidemiological and biological interactions.

Authors:  P Boyle; R Leake
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  A multifactorial analysis of steroid hormone receptors in stages I and II breast cancer.

Authors:  H M Kohail; E G Elias; S A el-Nowiem; N Bashirelahi; M S Didolkar; W P Reed
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Disease-free interval and estrogen receptor activity in tumor tissue of patients with primary breast cancer: analysis after long-term follow-up.

Authors:  J M Raemaekers; L V Beex; A J Koenders; G F Pieters; A G Smals; T J Benraad; P W Kloppenborg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Tamoxifen. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use.

Authors:  M M Buckley; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Proliferative index of breast carcinoma by thymidine labeling: prognostic power independent of stage, estrogen and progesterone receptors.

Authors:  J S Meyer; M Province
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  The predictive value of steroid hormone receptor analysis in breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R Vihko; A Alanko; V Isomaa; A Kauppila
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1986

10.  Progesterone receptor activity and relapse-free survival in patients with primary breast cancer: the role of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  J M Raemaekers; L V Beex; G F Pieters; A G Smals; T J Benraad; P W Kloppenborg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.