Literature DB >> 9265662

Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced MR mammography in patients with breast cancer.

U Fischer1, L Kopka, U Brinck, M Korabiowska, A Schauer, E Grabbe.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of contrast-enhanced MR mammography in patients with breast cancer. A total of 190 patients with breast cancer (37 noninvasive carcinomas, 153 invasive carcinomas) underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography preoperatively. Using 1.5-T unit, T1-weighted sequences (2D FLASH) were obtained repeatedly one time before and five times after IV administration of 0.1 mmol gadopentetate-dimeglumine per kilogram body weight. The findings on MR imaging were correlated with histopathologically defined prognostic factors (histological type, tumor size, tumor grading, metastasis in lymph nodes). In addition, immunohistochemically defined prognostic factors (c-erbB-1, c-erbB-2, p53, Ki-67) were correlated with the signal increase on MR mammogram in 40 patients. There was no significant correlation between the findings on MR mammography and the histopathological type of carcinoma, the grading, and the lymphonodular status. Noninvasive carcinomas showed a higher rate of moderate (38 %) or low (27 %) enhancement on MR imaging than invasive carcinomas (6 and 3 %). The results on MR mammography and the results of immunohistochemical stainings did not correlate significantly. Noninvasive carcinomas showed significantly lower enhancement than invasive carcinomas. However, the signal behavior of contrast-enhanced MR mammography is not related to established histopathological prognostic parameters as subtyping, grading, nodal status, and the expression of certain oncogenes/tumor suppressor genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9265662     DOI: 10.1007/s003300050240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of quantitative parametric analysis for characterization of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.

Authors:  E A M Hauth; H Jaeger; S Maderwald; C Stockamp; A Mühler; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Can dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) predict tumor recurrence and lymph node status in patients with breast cancer?

Authors:  S Bahri; J-H Chen; H J Yu; A Kuzucan; O Nalcioglu; M-Y Su
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Antibody-based imaging of HER-2: moving into the clinic.

Authors:  R E Wang; Y Zhang; L Tian; W Cai; J Cai
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.222

4.  Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer - Potential Future Aspects.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Wolfgang Bogner; Stephan Gruber; Peter Brader; Siegfried Trattnig; Georgios Karanikas; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Relationship between preoperative breast MRI and surgical treatment of non-metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Julie E Weiss; Martha E Goodrich; Weiwei Zhu; Wendy B DeMartini; Karla Kerlikowske; Elissa Ozanne; Anna N A Tosteson; Louise M Henderson; Diana S M Buist; Karen J Wernli; Sally D Herschorn; Elise Hotaling; Cristina O'Donoghue; Rebecca Hubbard
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Fischer's score criteria correlating with histopathological prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  V Girardi; G Carbognin; L Camera; M Tonegutti; F Bonetti; E Manfrin; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Monitoring therapeutic response of human ovarian cancer to 17-DMAG by noninvasive PET imaging with (64)Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab.

Authors:  Gang Niu; Zibo Li; Qizhen Cao; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Accuracy and interpretation time of computer-aided detection among novice and experienced breast MRI readers.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Jeffrey D Blume; Wendy B DeMartini; Nola M Hylton; Benjamin Herman; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Correlation between high resolution dynamic MR features and prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Shin Ho Lee; Nariya Cho; Seung Ja Kim; Joo Hee Cha; Kyung Soo Cho; Eun Sook Ko; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Relationship between morphological features and kinetic patterns of enhancement of the dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging and clinico-pathological and biological factors in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Oscar Fernández-Guinea; Alejandro Andicoechea; Luis O González; Salomé González-Reyes; Antonio M Merino; Luis C Hernández; Alfonso López-Muñiz; Paz García-Pravia; Francisco J Vizoso
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.