Literature DB >> 20204536

Tracking abnormal cervical cancer screening: evaluation of an EMR-based intervention.

Elizabeth A Dupuis1, Hilary F White, Daniel Newman, Jerome E Sobieraj, Manjusha Gokhale, Karen M Freund.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: System level barriers have been associated with inadequate follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate an electronic tracking system to improve follow-up of abnormal Pap tests. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: We implemented an electronic medical record (EMR)-based Pap test tracking system at two clinical practices at an inner-city academic health center. The system generated a provider-specific monthly report of all abnormal Pap results, and provided a patient-specific Pap tracking table embedded in the EMR for each subject. EVALUATION: We compared abnormal Pap test follow-up rates for the 24 months pre-intervention with rates 12 months following its implementation (post-intervention). The evaluation followed all subjects for 12 months from the date of their abnormal Pap test, looking for diagnostic resolution.
RESULTS: Subjects were young women (mean age = 30.5) of primarily white (42%) and African American (37%) descent, who spoke English (88%). Forty-eight percent were insured through publicly subsidized insurance. Controlling for type of abnormality and practice location, the adjusted mean time to resolution decreased significantly from 108 days (confidence interval, CI 105-112 days) in the pre-intervention period to 86 days (CI 81-91 days).
CONCLUSION: Our study cannot demonstrate that with follow up, we directly avoided cases of invasive cervical cancer. However, we show that in an at-risk urban population, an automated, EMR-based tracking system reduced the time to resolution, and increased the number of women who achieved diagnostic resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20204536      PMCID: PMC2869412          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1287-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  12 in total

1.  Formation and operation of a captive insurance company for malpractice coverage.

Authors:  R W Townsend
Journal:  Coll Rev       Date:  1988

2.  Improving follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  E D Paskett; E White; W B Carter; J Chu
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Investigation of non-responders at a cervical cancer screening clinic in Manchester.

Authors:  V Nathoo
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-04-09

Review 4.  The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Susan L Norris; Phyllis J Nichols; Carl J Caspersen; Russell E Glasgow; Michael M Engelgau; Leonard Jack; George Isham; Susan R Snyder; Vilma G Carande-Kulis; Sanford Garfield; Peter Briss; David McCulloch
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Improving follow-up to abnormal breast cancer screening in an urban population. A patient navigation intervention.

Authors:  Tracy A Battaglia; Kathryn Roloff; Michael A Posner; Karen M Freund
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: methods, protocol, and measures.

Authors:  Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia; Elizabeth Calhoun; Donald J Dudley; Kevin Fiscella; Electra Paskett; Peter C Raich; Richard G Roetzheim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Compliance with referrals from a cancer-screening project.

Authors:  D S Lane
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Improving adherence to screening follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears: results from a large clinic-based trial of three intervention strategies.

Authors:  A C Marcus; L A Crane; C P Kaplan; A E Reading; E Savage; J Gunning; G Bernstein; J S Berek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Compliance with therapy for cervical dysplasia among women of low socioeconomic status.

Authors:  T W Laedtke; M Dignan
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  Follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears among women of different races.

Authors:  P Carey; D K Gjerdingen
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  10 in total

1.  Impact of GP reminders on follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology: a before-after study in Danish general practice.

Authors:  Bettina Kjær Kristiansen; Berit Andersen; Flemming Bro; Hans Svanholm; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Patient-, Provider-, and System-Level Barriers to Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Patients in the USA: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Eliza W Beal; Mackenzie Owen; Molly McNamara; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Allan Tsung
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2022-07-26

3.  Computable Guidelines and Clinical Decision Support for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management to Improve Outcomes and Health Equity.

Authors:  Mona Saraiya; Jean Colbert; Geeta L Bhat; Rose Almonte; David W Winters; Sharon Sebastian; Michael O'Hanlon; Ginny Meadows; Michael R Nosal; Thomas B Richards; Maria Michaels; Julie S Townsend; Jacqueline W Miller; Rebecca B Perkins; George F Sawaya; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mary C White; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 3.017

4.  Assessment of follow-up completeness and notification preferences for imaging findings of possible cancer: what happens after radiologists submit their reports?

Authors:  Caroline E Sloan; Seetharam C Chadalavada; Tessa S Cook; Curtis P Langlotz; Mitchell D Schnall; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  Follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests: considering the multilevel context of care.

Authors:  Jane M Zapka; Heather M Edwards; Veronica Chollette; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Michael R Henry; Robert A Greenes; Ronald A Hankey; Hongfang Liu; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Use of health information technology to reduce diagnostic errors.

Authors:  Robert El-Kareh; Omar Hasan; Gordon D Schiff
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Impact of Patient Reminders on Papanicolaou Test Completion for High-Risk Patients Identified by a Clinical Decision Support System.

Authors:  Kathy L MacLaughlin; Maya E Kessler; Ravikumar Komandur Elayavilli; Branden C Hickey; Marianne R Scheitel; Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Hongfang Liu; Walter K Kremers; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  The impact of health information technology on the management and follow-up of test results - a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Georgiou; Julie Li; Judith Thomas; Maria R Dahm; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Improving Team-Based Decision Making Using Data Analytics and Informatics: Protocol for a Collaborative Decision Support Design.

Authors:  Don Roosan; Anandi V Law; Mazharul Karim; Moom Roosan
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-11-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.