Literature DB >> 20204534

The need for pressure changes in CPAP therapy 2-3 months after initial treatment: a prospective trial in 905 patients with sleep-disordered breathing.

Nikolaus C Netzer1, János Juhász, Markus Hofmann, Kathrin Hohl, Kingman P Strohl, Thomas E A H Küpper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the need for pressure change in patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) several weeks after therapy initiation. We prospectively studied 905 consecutive patients (740 men and 165 women) with SDB and therapeutic intervention with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)/bilevel PAP.
METHODS: Several weeks after therapy initiation, patients were restudied for control, and pressure was optimized if it was necessary. The differences in CPAP pressure from initial treatment and control night were assessed. Anthropometric data, polysomnography data, Epworth sleepiness scale, and Berlin questionnaire scores were correlated to pressure differences from the first and control titration nights.
RESULTS: Pressure change was needed in 511 patients (58.2%). Pressure increase was more frequent than pressure reduction (41.7% vs. 11.7%). Mean pressure increase in CPAP was 1.3 mbar, and mean decrease, 1.6 mbar. In the bilevel PAP group, the mean increase in inspiratory pressure was 1.2 mbar, and in expiratory pressure, 0.8 mbar; the mean decrease in inspiratory pressure was 1.9 mbar, and in expiratory pressure, 1.4 mbar. No correlation was found between anthropometric data, sleep efficacy, the amount of rapid eye movement sleep per night, or questionnaire scores and pressure change.
CONCLUSION: Our results show that pressure changes are necessary in the majority of patients several weeks after therapy initiation. Therefore, re-evaluation of therapy pressure is useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20204534     DOI: 10.1007/s11325-010-0332-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep Breath        ISSN: 1520-9512            Impact factor:   2.816


  24 in total

1.  Is (re)titration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea necessary?

Authors:  S Choi; R Mullins; J H Crosby; R J Davies; J R Stradling
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.492

2.  Role of different nocturnal monitorings in the evaluation of CPAP titration by autoCPAP devices.

Authors:  Oreste Marrone; Giuseppe Insalaco; Adriana Salvaggio; Giovanni Bonsignore
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.415

Review 3.  Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures: an update for 2005.

Authors:  Clete A Kushida; Michael R Littner; Timothy Morgenthaler; Cathy A Alessi; Dennis Bailey; Jack Coleman; Leah Friedman; Max Hirshkowitz; Sheldon Kapen; Milton Kramer; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Daniel L Loube; Judith Owens; Jeffrey P Pancer; Merrill Wise
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Is treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome with auto-CPAP useful?

Authors:  F Sériès
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  Reversal of obstructive sleep apnoea by continuous positive airway pressure applied through the nares.

Authors:  C E Sullivan; F G Issa; M Berthon-Jones; L Eves
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-04-18       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Prevalence of symptoms and risk of sleep apnea in primary care.

Authors:  Nikolaus C Netzer; Josef J Hoegel; Daniel Loube; Cordula M Netzer; Birgit Hay; Rudolfo Alvarez-Sala; Kingman P Strohl
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Relative accuracy of algorithm-based prescription of nasal CPAP in OSA.

Authors:  J R Stradling; M Hardinge; J Paxton; D M Smith
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.415

8.  A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale.

Authors:  M W Johns
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  Flow limitation as a noninvasive assessment of residual upper-airway resistance during continuous positive airway pressure therapy of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  R Condos; R G Norman; I Krishnasamy; N Peduzzi; R M Goldring; D M Rapoport
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Efficacy of automated continuous positive airway pressure in children with sleep-related breathing disorders in an attended setting.

Authors:  Luciana Palombini; Rafael Pelayo; Christian Guilleminault
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  5 in total

1.  A new predictive model for continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Matthew R Ebben; Mariya Narizhnaya; Ana C Krieger
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Multinight recording and analysis of continuous positive airway pressure airflow in the home for titration and management of sleep disordered breathing.

Authors:  Cynthia Y Callahan; Robert G Norman; Zachary Taxin; Anne M Mooney; David M Rapoport; Indu Ayappa
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Clinical utility of repeated positive airway pressure titrations in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Authors:  Ozge Yendur; Lance Feld; Monica Miranda-Schaeubinger; Melissa S Xanthopoulos; Suzanne E Beck; Christopher M Cielo; Emma J Escobar; Ignacio E Tapia
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Long-term efficacy of an oral appliance in early treated patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Marie Marklund
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Polysomnographic evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea treatment with fixed pressure CPAP determined by formula.

Authors:  Danilo M Sá; Elcio O Vianna
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.816

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.