Literature DB >> 26518477

A unique ecological niche fosters hybridization of oak-tree and vineyard isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Katie J Clowers1, Jessica L Will1, Audrey P Gasch1,2.   

Abstract

Differential adaptation to distinct niches can restrict gene flow and promote population differentiation within a species. However, in some cases the distinction between niches can collapse, forming a hybrid niche with features of both environments. We previously reported that distinctions between vineyards and oak soil present an ecological barrier that restricts gene flow between lineages of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Vineyard isolates are tolerant to stresses associated with grapes while North American oak strains are particularly tolerant to freeze-thaw cycles. Here, we report the isolation of S. cerevisiae strains from Wisconsin cherry trees, which display features common to vineyards (e.g. high sugar concentrations) and frequent freeze-thaw cycles. Genome sequencing revealed that the isolated strains are highly heterozygous and represent recent hybrids of the oak × vineyard lineages. We found that the hybrid strains are phenotypically similar to vineyard strains for some traits, but are more similar to oak strains for other traits. The cherry strains were exceptionally good at growing in cherry juice, raising the possibility that they have adapted to this niche. We performed transcriptome profiling in cherry, oak and vineyard strains and show that the cherry-tree hybrids display vineyard-like or oak-like expression, depending on the gene sets, and in some cases, the expression patterns linked back to shared stress tolerances. Allele-specific expression in these natural hybrids suggested concerted cis-regulatory evolution at sets of functionally regulated genes. Our results raise the possibility that hybridization of the two lineages provides a genetic solution to the thriving in this unique niche.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allele-specific expression; ecological divergence; environmental stress; hybridization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26518477      PMCID: PMC4824287          DOI: 10.1111/mec.13439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  57 in total

1.  Open source clustering software.

Authors:  M J L de Hoon; S Imoto; J Nolan; S Miyano
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers.

Authors:  Thibaut Jombart
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  A powerful and flexible statistical framework for testing hypotheses of allele-specific gene expression from RNA-seq data.

Authors:  Daniel A Skelly; Marnie Johansson; Jennifer Madeoy; Jon Wakefield; Joshua M Akey
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Genetic basis of mitochondrial function and morphology in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kai Stefan Dimmer; Stefan Fritz; Florian Fuchs; Marlies Messerschmitt; Nadja Weinbach; Walter Neupert; Benedikt Westermann
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 5.  Bread, beer and wine: yeast domestication in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex.

Authors:  Delphine Sicard; Jean-Luc Legras
Journal:  C R Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.583

6.  Reproductive isolation caused by visual predation on migrants between divergent environments.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  QTL dissection of Lag phase in wine fermentation reveals a new translocation responsible for Saccharomyces cerevisiae adaptation to sulfite.

Authors:  Adrien Zimmer; Cécile Durand; Nicolás Loira; Pascal Durrens; David James Sherman; Philippe Marullo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Davis J McCarthy; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Ecological and Genetic Barriers Differentiate Natural Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Katie J Clowers; Justin Heilberger; Jeff S Piotrowski; Jessica L Will; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Differential adaptation to multi-stressed conditions of wine fermentation revealed by variations in yeast regulatory networks.

Authors:  Christian Brion; Chloé Ambroset; Isabelle Sanchez; Jean-Luc Legras; Bruno Blondin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary biology through the lens of budding yeast comparative genomics.

Authors:  Souhir Marsit; Jean-Baptiste Leducq; Éléonore Durand; Axelle Marchant; Marie Filteau; Christian R Landry
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Adaptation by Loss of Heterozygosity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Clones Under Divergent Selection.

Authors:  Timothy Y James; Lucas A Michelotti; Alexander D Glasco; Rebecca A Clemons; Robert A Powers; Ellen S James; D Rabern Simmons; Fengyan Bai; Shuhua Ge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  No evidence for extrinsic post-zygotic isolation in a wild Saccharomyces yeast system.

Authors:  Guillaume Charron; Christian R Landry
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Whole Genome Comparison Reveals High Levels of Inbreeding and Strain Redundancy Across the Spectrum of Commercial Wine Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Anthony R Borneman; Angus H Forgan; Radka Kolouchova; James A Fraser; Simon A Schmidt
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Intrinsic cooperativity potentiates parallel cis-regulatory evolution.

Authors:  Trevor R Sorrells; Amanda N Johnson; Conor J Howard; Candace S Britton; Kyle R Fowler; Jordan T Feigerle; P Anthony Weil; Alexander D Johnson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 8.140

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.