Literature DB >> 20194164

Multilocus genotypes from Charles Darwin's finches: biodiversity lost since the voyage of the Beagle.

Kenneth Petren1, Peter R Grant, B Rosemary Grant, Andrew A Clack, Ninnia V Lescano.   

Abstract

Genetic analysis of museum specimens offers a direct window into a past that can predate the loss of extinct forms. We genotyped 18 Galápagos finches collected by Charles Darwin and companions during the voyage of the Beagle in 1835, and 22 specimens collected in 1901. Our goals were to determine if significant genetic diversity has been lost since the Beagle voyage and to determine the genetic source of specimens for which the collection locale was not recorded. Using 'ancient' DNA techniques, we quantified variation at 14 autosomal microsatellite loci. Assignment tests showed several museum specimens genetically matched recently field-sampled birds from their island of origin. Some were misclassified or were difficult to classify. Darwin's exceptionally large ground finches (Geospiza magnirostris) from Floreana and San Cristóbal were genetically distinct from several other currently existing populations. Sharp-beaked ground finches (Geospiza difficilis) from Floreana and Isabela were also genetically distinct. These four populations are currently extinct, yet they were more genetically distinct from congeners than many other species of Darwin's finches are from each other. We conclude that a significant amount of the finch biodiversity observed and collected by Darwin has been lost since the voyage of the Beagle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20194164      PMCID: PMC2830239          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  22 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  'Ghost' alleles of the Mauritius kestrel.

Authors:  J J Groombridge; C G Jones; M W Bruford; R A Nichols
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies.

Authors:  A Bonin; E Bellemain; P Bronken Eidesen; F Pompanon; C Brochmann; P Taberlet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Comparative landscape genetics and the adaptive radiation of Darwin's finches: the role of peripheral isolation.

Authors:  K Petren; P R Grant; B R Grant; L F Keller
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Hybridization in the recent past.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant; K Petren
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Assessing ancient DNA studies.

Authors:  M Thomas P Gilbert; Hans-Jürgen Bandelt; Michael Hofreiter; Ian Barnes
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Back to the future: museum specimens in population genetics.

Authors:  Peter Wandeler; Paquita E A Hoeck; Lukas F Keller
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-27       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Microsatellite primers from Geospiza fortis and cross-species amplification in Darwin's finches.

Authors:  K Petren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  Darwin's Galapagos finches in modern biology.

Authors:  Arhat Abzhanov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Ancient DNA microsatellite analyses of the extinct New Zealand giant moa (Dinornis robustus) identify relatives within a single fossil site.

Authors:  M E Allentoft; R Heller; R N Holdaway; M Bunce
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Predictable allele frequency changes due to habitat fragmentation in the Glanville fritillary butterfly.

Authors:  Toby Fountain; Marko Nieminen; Jukka Sirén; Swee Chong Wong; Rainer Lehtonen; Ilkka Hanski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Paleopopulation genetics.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall; Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Evolutionary dead end in the Galápagos: divergence of sexual signals in the rarest of Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm; Heather Farrington; Kenneth Petren; Birgit Fessl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Profiling the dead: generating microsatellite data from fossil bones of extinct megafauna--protocols, problems, and prospects.

Authors:  Morten E Allentoft; Charlotte Oskam; Jayne Houston; Marie L Hale; M Thomas P Gilbert; Morten Rasmussen; Peter Spencer; Christopher Jacomb; Eske Willerslev; Richard N Holdaway; Michael Bunce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Morphological ghosts of introgression in Darwin's finch populations.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  A preliminary review of influential works in data-driven discovery.

Authors:  Mark Stalzer; Chris Mentzel
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-08-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.