Literature DB >> 20194153

Clinician's guide to imaging and pathologic findings in benign breast disease.

Lonzetta Neal1, Cindy L Tortorelli, Aziza Nassar.   

Abstract

The discussion of abnormal results of breast imaging and abnormal pathologic findings can be challenging for health care professionals and often is stressful for patients. Although most imaging findings and biopsy results are negative and do not infer a substantial increase in breast cancer risk, the subsequent conversation between the patient and her practitioner is more effective and informative with a thorough review of the pathologic results and an appreciation of the importance of radiologic-histologic concordance. This article provides insight into and understanding of breast imaging and biopsy techniques and of histologic findings as a means to timely and appropriate decision making and action by the patient and her health care professional.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20194153      PMCID: PMC2843107          DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  38 in total

1.  Multiple papillomas of the breast: is current management adequate?

Authors:  Kaur Harjit; Peter C Willsher; Michelle Bennett; Lee R Jackson; Cecily Metcalf; Christobel M Saunders
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  An analysis of breast cancer risk in women with single, multiple, and atypical papilloma.

Authors:  Jason T Lewis; Lynn C Hartmann; Robert A Vierkant; Shaun D Maloney; V Shane Pankratz; Teresa M Allers; Marlene H Frost; Daniel W Visscher
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  The probably benign assessment.

Authors:  Jessica W T Leung; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Vani Dandolu; Enrique Hernandez
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection--prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Marilyn J Morton; Dana H Whaley; Kathleen R Brandt; Kimberly K Amrami
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Significance of flat epithelial atypia on mammotome core needle biopsy: Should it be excised?

Authors:  Lakshmi P Kunju; Celina G Kleer
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Multiplicity of benign breast lesions is a risk factor for progression to breast cancer.

Authors:  Maria J Worsham; Usha Raju; Mei Lu; Alissa Kapke; Jingfang Cheng; Sandra R Wolman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions and malignancy in a screening programme: incidence and histological features revisited.

Authors:  E M Doyle; N Banville; C M Quinn; F Flanagan; A O'Doherty; A D K Hill; M J Kerin; P Fitzpatrick; M Kennedy
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Benign breast lesions mimicking carcinoma at mammography.

Authors:  S Pojchamarnwiputh; M Muttarak; W Na-Chiangmai; B Chaiwun
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.858

View more
  3 in total

1.  How can additional ultrasonography screening improve the detection of occult breast cancer in women with dense breasts?

Authors:  Parisa Pishdad; Ameneh Moosavi; Reza Jalli; Fariba Zarei; Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam; Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-13

2.  Assessment of Functional Differences in Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions and Improvement of Diagnostic Accuracy by Using US-guided Diffuse Optical Tomography in Conjunction with Conventional US.

Authors:  Quing Zhu; Andrew Ricci; Poornima Hegde; Mark Kane; Edward Cronin; Alex Merkulov; Yan Xu; Behnoosh Tavakoli; Susan Tannenbaum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Correlation of the BI-RADS assessment categories of Papua New Guinean women with mammographic parenchymal patterns, age and diagnosis.

Authors:  Ruth Pape; Kelly Maree Spuur; Jenny Maree Wilkinson; Pius Umo
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-09-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.