Literature DB >> 32936540

Correlation of the BI-RADS assessment categories of Papua New Guinean women with mammographic parenchymal patterns, age and diagnosis.

Ruth Pape1,2, Kelly Maree Spuur3, Jenny Maree Wilkinson3, Pius Umo2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Women with increased breast density are at increased risk of breast cancer. The aim of this research is to evidence for the first time the mammographic breast findings of Papua New Guinean (PNG) women and the relationship between Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment, mammographic parenchymal patterns (MPPs) and age.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1357 mammograms of women imaged at the Pacific International Hospital (PIH) from August 2006 to July 2010 was undertaken. Mammographic findings were categorised using the BI-RADS Atlas® 5th Edition. MPPs were recorded for each woman using the Tabár Pattern I-V classification system. Age was recorded in years. Statistical analysis was by descriptive analysis and Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's post-test and Spearman's rho correlation for inferential analysis.
RESULTS: True pathological findings (benign and malignant); BI-RADS 2-5 were noted in 111 women (8.2%); 1242 (91.5%) were negative. BI-RADS categories for malignancy were reported in 16 (88.9%) of women aged 30 to 60 years. The lower risk Tabár Type I, II and III MPPs were associated with 94.4% (n = 17) of malignancies. Linear correlations between variables were weak and not statistically significant: age and Tabár pattern r = 0.031, P = 0.0261; age and BI-RADS r = 0.018, P = 0.517; Tabár pattern and BI-RADS r = 0.020, P = 0.459 (n = 1357).
CONCLUSION: There was no correlation demonstrated between BI-RADS category, age and MPP. Importantly, there was no correlation demonstrated between BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 for breast malignancy and high-risk Tabár Type IV and V MPPs. The results of this study again reflect that the incidence of breast cancer in PNG cannot be explained by breast density and suggest that any formalised screening program in PNG has a target age group aimed at women younger than that of Western screening programs.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BI-RADS; Papua New Guinea; breast density; breast pathology; mammographic parenchymal patterns

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32936540      PMCID: PMC7754014          DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci        ISSN: 2051-3895


  24 in total

1.  Breast cancer increases on Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  B Kuska
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-06-16       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Breast density: why all the fuss?

Authors:  S J Vinnicombe
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Breast cancer in Papua New Guinea: a survey of 10 years.

Authors:  S K SenGupta; G B Bukenya; D P Murthy
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1990-01

Review 4.  Cancer epidemiology in the pacific islands - past, present and future.

Authors:  Malcolm A Moore; Francine Baumann; Sunia Foliaki; Marc T Goodman; Robert Haddock; Roger Maraka; Josefa Koroivueta; David Roder; Thomas Vinit; Helen J D Whippy; Tomotaka Sobue
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2010

5.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer at and after a prevalence screen in Singaporean women.

Authors:  R W Jakes; S W Duffy; F C Ng; F Gao; E H Ng
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 6.  Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening.

Authors:  Phoebe E Freer
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Family history of breast cancer, age and benign breast disease.

Authors:  Penelope M Webb; Celia Byrne; Stuart J Schnitt; James L Connolly; Timothy Jacobs; Gloria Peiro; Walter Willett; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-07-20       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Younger age as a prognostic indicator in breast cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Elrasheid H A Kheirelseid; Jennifer M E Boggs; Catherine Curran; Ronan W Glynn; Cara Dooley; Karl J Sweeney; Michael J Kerin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Breast Cancer Screening Programmes across the WHO European Region: Differences among Countries Based on National Income Level.

Authors:  Emma Altobelli; Leonardo Rapacchietta; Paolo Matteo Angeletti; Luca Barbante; Filippo Valerio Profeta; Roberto Fagnano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A review of mammographic image quality in Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  Ruth Pape; Kelly Maree Spuur; Jenny Maree Wilkinson; Aileen Zuhukepe
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2021-08-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.