Literature DB >> 16723843

An analysis of breast cancer risk in women with single, multiple, and atypical papilloma.

Jason T Lewis1, Lynn C Hartmann, Robert A Vierkant, Shaun D Maloney, V Shane Pankratz, Teresa M Allers, Marlene H Frost, Daniel W Visscher.   

Abstract

Breast papillomas may be single or multiple and associated with atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasias (ADH/ALH). The risk of breast carcinoma development in patients with papillomas, particularly those with multiple or atypical lesions, is incompletely defined. Fibrocystic lesions were histopathologically classified in a benign breast disease cohort of 9155 who underwent biopsy from 1967 to 1991, with papilloma assessment in 9108. Individuals with papillomas (N=480) were classified into 4 groups: single papilloma (SP, N=372), single papilloma with ADH or ALH (SP+A, N=54), multiple (>5) papillomas (MP, N=41), and multiple papillomas with ADH or ALH (MP+A, N=13). Those without papillomas were classified as nonproliferative (NP, N=6053), proliferative without atypia (PDWA, N=2308), and ADH/ALH [atypical hyperplasia (AH), N=267]. The relative risk of cancer development within our cohort was compared to that expected in the general population using standardized incidence ratios. The relative risk of breast cancer development associated with SP [2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-2.81] was greater than NP (1.28, 95% CI 1.16-1.42) but similar to PDWA (1.90, 95% CI 1.66-2.16). The risk associated with SP+A (5.11, 95% CI 2.64-8.92) was highly elevated but not substantively different than atypical hyperplasia (4.17, 95% CI 3.10-5.50). Patients with MP are at increased risk compared with PDWA or SP (3.01, 95% CI 1.10-6.55), particularly those with MP+A (7.01, 95% CI 1.91-17.97). There was a marginal increase in breast cancer risk (16%) among patients with proliferative disease if a papilloma was present, but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.29). The observed frequency of ipsilateral (vs. contralateral) breast cancer development in papilloma subsets was not significantly different than other patient groups. We conclude that SP imparts a cancer risk similar to conventional proliferative fibrocystic change. The presence of papilloma in, or associated with, atypia does not modify the risk connotation of ADH/ALH overall. MP constitutes a proliferative breast disease subset having unique clinical and biologic behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16723843     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200606000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  27 in total

1.  Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for intracystic breast tumors: a report of three cases.

Authors:  Kumiko Kato; Hiroko Nogi; Tomoyuki Ohta; Makiko Kamio; Yasuo Toriumi; Norio Nakata; Ken Uchida; Yukio Miyamoto; Hiroshi Takeyama
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 2.  Paradigm Shifts in Breast Care Delivery: Impact of Imaging in a Multidisciplinary Environment.

Authors:  Savitri Krishnamurthy; Therese Bevers; Henry M Kuerer; Benjamin Smith; Wei Tse Yang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Outcomes of benign intraductal papillomas diagnosed on core biopsy: a review of 104 cases with subsequent excision from a single institution.

Authors:  Jaya Ruth Asirvatham; Julie M Jorns; Lili Zhao; Deborah O Jeffries; Angela J Wu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  [Diagnostics of benign ductal epithelial cell proliferation of the breast in biopsy material].

Authors:  H-P Sinn; C Flechtenmacher; S Aulmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 5.  How Do We Approach Benign Proliferative Lesions?

Authors:  Faina Nakhlis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Risk factors for malignancy in benign papillomas of the breast on core needle biopsy.

Authors:  So-Youn Jung; Han-Sung Kang; Youngmee Kwon; Sun Young Min; Eun-A Kim; Kyoung Lan Ko; Seeyoun Lee; Seok Won Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Characterisation of breast papillary neoplasm on automated breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Q-L Zhu; J Zhang; X-J Lai; H-Y Wang; M-S Xiao; Y-X Jiang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Clinician's guide to imaging and pathologic findings in benign breast disease.

Authors:  Lonzetta Neal; Cindy L Tortorelli; Aziza Nassar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  A multi-center prospective cohort study of benign breast disease and risk of subsequent breast cancer.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Kabat; Joan G Jones; Neal Olson; Abdissa Negassa; Catherine Duggan; Mindy Ginsberg; Rita A Kandel; Andrew G Glass; Thomas E Rohan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Diagnostic Pitfalls in Papillary Lesions of the Breast: Experience from a Single Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Sridevi Hanaganahalli Basavaiah; Jessica Minal; Saraswathy Sreeram; Pooja Kundapur Suresh; Hema Kini; Deepa Adiga; Kausalya Kumari Sahu; Radha R Pai
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.