Literature DB >> 20193747

Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception.

M Di Luca1, B Knörlein, M O Ernst, M Harders.   

Abstract

Spring compliance is perceived by combining the sensed force exerted by the spring with the displacement caused by the action (sensed through vision and proprioception). We investigated the effect of delay of visual and force information with respect to proprioception to understand how visual-haptic perception of compliance is achieved. First, we confirm an earlier result that force delay increases perceived compliance. Furthermore, we find that perceived compliance decreases with a delay in the visual information. These effects of delay on perceived compliance would not be present if the perceptual system would utilize all force-displacement information available during the interaction. Both delays generate a bias in compliance which is opposite in the loading and unloading phases of the interaction. To explain these findings, we propose that information during the loading phase of the spring displacement is weighted more than information obtained during unloading. We confirm this hypothesis by showing that sensitivity to compliance during loading movements is much higher than during unloading movements. Moreover, we show that visual and proprioceptive information about the hand position are used for compliance perception depending on the sensitivity to compliance. Finally, by analyzing participants' movements we show that these two factors (loading/unloading and reliability) account for the change in perceived compliance due to visual and force delays.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20193747     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  18 in total

1.  What you feel is what you see: inverse dynamics estimation underlies the resistive sensation of a delayed cursor.

Authors:  Shinya Takamuku; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Representing delayed force feedback as a combination of current and delayed states.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; Firas Mawase; Amir Karniel; Lior Shmuelof; Opher Donchin; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The effect of force feedback delay on stiffness perception and grip force modulation during tool-mediated interaction with elastic force fields.

Authors:  Raz Leib; Amir Karniel; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Stretching the skin immediately enhances perceived stiffness and gradually enhances the predictive control of grip force.

Authors:  Mor Farajian; Raz Leib; Hanna Kossowsky; Tomer Zaidenberg; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  A recursive Bayesian updating model of haptic stiffness perception.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta L Klatzky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  State-Based Delay Representation and Its Transfer from a Game of Pong to Reaching and Tracking.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; Raz Leib; Assaf Pressman; Lucia S Simo; Amir Karniel; Lior Shmuelof; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-12-26

7.  Awareness shaping or shaped by prediction and postdiction: Editorial.

Authors:  Yuki Yamada; Takahiro Kawabe; Makoto Miyazaki
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-18

8.  Touch influences perceived gloss.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; Iona S Kerrigan; Erich W Graf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Delays in Admittance-Controlled Haptic Devices Make Simulated Masses Feel Heavier.

Authors:  Irene A Kuling; Jeroen B J Smeets; Piet Lammertse; Bram Onneweer; Winfred Mugge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Imposed visual feedback delay of an action changes mass perception based on the sensory prediction error.

Authors:  Takuya Honda; Nobuhiro Hagura; Toshinori Yoshioka; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.