BACKGROUND & AIMS: Observational studies and small randomized controlled trials have shown that the use of laparoscopy in colon resection for diverticular disease is feasible and results in fewer complications. We analyzed data from a large, prospectively maintained, multicenter database (National Surgical Quality Initiative Program) to determine whether the use of laparoscopy in the elective treatment of diverticular disease decreases rates of complications compared with open surgery, independent of preoperative comorbid factors. METHODS: The analysis included data from 6970 patients who underwent elective surgeries for diverticular disease from 2005 to 2008. Patients with diverticular disease were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision codes and then categorized into open or laparoscopic groups based on Current Procedural Terminology codes. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed to determine factors associated with increased risk for postoperative complications. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 3468 patients who underwent open surgery and 3502 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures. After correcting for probability of morbidity, American Society of Anesthesiology class, and ostomy creation, overall complications (including superficial surgical site infections, deep incisional surgical site infections, sepsis, and septic shock) occurred with significantly lower incidence among patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures compared with those who received open operations. CONCLUSIONS: The use of laparoscopy for treating diverticular disease, in the absence of absolute contraindications, results in fewer postoperative complications compared with open surgery. Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Observational studies and small randomized controlled trials have shown that the use of laparoscopy in colon resection for diverticular disease is feasible and results in fewer complications. We analyzed data from a large, prospectively maintained, multicenter database (National Surgical Quality Initiative Program) to determine whether the use of laparoscopy in the elective treatment of diverticular disease decreases rates of complications compared with open surgery, independent of preoperative comorbid factors. METHODS: The analysis included data from 6970 patients who underwent elective surgeries for diverticular disease from 2005 to 2008. Patients with diverticular disease were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision codes and then categorized into open or laparoscopic groups based on Current Procedural Terminology codes. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed to determine factors associated with increased risk for postoperative complications. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 3468 patients who underwent open surgery and 3502 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures. After correcting for probability of morbidity, American Society of Anesthesiology class, and ostomy creation, overall complications (including superficial surgical site infections, deep incisional surgical site infections, sepsis, and septic shock) occurred with significantly lower incidence among patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures compared with those who received open operations. CONCLUSIONS: The use of laparoscopy for treating diverticular disease, in the absence of absolute contraindications, results in fewer postoperative complications compared with open surgery. Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: H D Vargas; R T Ramirez; G C Hoffman; G W Hubbard; R J Gould; S D Wohlgemuth; W K Ruffin; J E Hatter; P Kolm Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: F Marusch; I Gastinger; C Schneider; H Scheidbach; J Konradt; H P Bruch; L Köhler; E Bärlehner; F Köckerling Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: F Köckerling; C Schneider; M A Reymond; H Scheidbach; H Scheuerlein; J Konradt; H P Bruch; C Zornig; L Köhler; E Bärlehner; A Kuthe; G Szinicz; H A Richter; W Hohenberger Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 May 14-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Hossein Masoomi; Brian Buchberg; Brian Nguyen; Vicrumdeep Tung; Michael J Stamos; Steven Mills Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Christina M Papageorge; Qianqian Zhao; Eugene F Foley; Bruce A Harms; Charles P Heise; Evie H Carchman; Gregory D Kennedy Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 2.192