Literature DB >> 21431387

The negative effects of surgery persist beyond the early postoperative period after laparoscopic colorectal resection.

M Ince1, H T Kirat, D P Geisler, F H Remzi, R P Kiran.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The recovery benefits of laparoscopy are traditionally believed to minimize the initial negative impact of surgery on early postoperative quality of life (QOL). We evaluate whether laparoscopic colectomy leads to recovery of QOL early after surgery and evaluate factors associated with the change in QOL.
METHODS: Preoperative and early postoperative QOL data (SF-36) were prospectively accrued for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR) (2002-2009). Changes in postoperative QOL from preoperative values and effects of patient, disease, operation and postoperative outcomes on these changes were evaluated.
RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-six patients (female = 86) underwent LCR for cancer (n = 79), Crohn's disease (n = 24), diverticulitis (n = 38), and ulcerative colitis (n = 25) with complete SF-36 scores. Median age was 56.9 (range: 15-91) years, mean body mass index 27.4 ± 6.2 kg/m(2) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class being II in 94 patients. Median operative time was 152.5 (range: 50-358) min; mean length of stay (LOS) 4.5 ± 3.3 days. At 4 weeks, the postoperative SF-36 physical component scale (PCS) continued to be lower than the preoperative PCS (41.8 ± 8.8 vs. 47.1 ± 9.4, P < 0.001), while the postoperative SF-36 mental component scale (MCS) was similar to the preoperative MCS (45.6 ± 10.2 vs. 46.1 ± 11.9, P = 0.17). Gender, age, operation, LOS, surgeon, ASA, BMI, complications, and readmission were not associated with a change in QOL from preoperative values. Cancer as an indication for surgery was associated with less improvement of MCS and PCS (P = 0.024 and 0.004, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Although patients who undergo LCR may have clinical evidence of healing at 4 weeks after surgery, QOL does not return to the preoperative level. This finding may help develop evidence-based recommendations pertaining to timing of return to full activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21431387     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-011-0677-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  18 in total

1.  Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The return to work experiences of colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kathleen M Sanchez; Jean L Richardson; Hyacinth R C Mason
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  2004-12

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

5.  Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  P M Falk; R W Beart; S D Wexner; A G Thorson; D G Jagelman; I C Lavery; O B Johansen; R J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Heidi Nelson; Shari Gelber; Daniel Sargent; Georgene Schroeder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Assessment of long-term quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for Crohn's disease.

Authors:  K Thaler; A Dinnewitzer; M Oberwalder; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma. Five-year results.

Authors:  M E Franklin; D Rosenthal; D Abrego-Medina; J P Dorman; J L Glass; R Norem; A Diaz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Gastrointestinal recovery after laparoscopic colectomy: results of a prospective, observational, multicenter study.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Peter W Marcello; Toyooki Sonoda; Paul Wise; Joel Bauer; Lee Techner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  4 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer: quality of life and satisfaction with care in elderly patients.

Authors:  Marco Scarpa; Loretta Di Cristofaro; Matteo Cortinovis; Eleonora Pinto; Maurizio Massa; Rita Alfieri; Matteo Cagol; Luca Saadeh; Aurelio Costa; Carlo Castoro; Nicolò Bassi; Cesare Ruffolo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Mohri; Hiromi Yasuda; Masaki Ohi; Koji Tanaka; Susumu Saigusa; Masato Okigami; Tadanobu Shimura; Minako Kobayashi; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Quality of life after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  George E Theodoropoulos; Theodoros Karantanos
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 4.  Surgical complications and their impact on patients' psychosocial well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Pinto; Omar Faiz; Rachel Davis; Alex Almoudaris; Charles Vincent
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.