Literature DB >> 20192721

Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Michael Y Wang1, Praveen V Mummaneni.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Adult degenerative scoliosis can be a cause of intractable pain, decreased mobility, and reduced quality of life. Surgical correction of this problem frequently leads to substantial clinical improvement, but advanced age, medical comorbidities, osteoporosis, and the rigidity of the spine result in high surgical complication rates. Minimally invasive surgery is being applied to this patient population in an effort to reduce the high complication rates associated with adult deformity surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 23 patients was undertaken to assess the clinical and radiographic results with minimally invasive surgery for adult thoracolumbar deformity surgery. All patients underwent a lateral interbody fusion followed by posterior percutaneous screw fixation and possible minimally invasive surgical transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion if fusion near the lumbosacral junction was necessary. A mean of 3.7 intersegmental levels were treated (range 2-7 levels). The mean follow-up was 13.4 months.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative Cobb angle was 31.4 degrees , and it was corrected to 11.5 degrees at follow-up. The mean blood loss was 477 ml, and the operative time was 401 minutes. The mean visual analog scale score improvement for axial pain was 3.96. Clear evidence of fusion was seen on radiographs at 84 of 86 treated levels, with no interbody pseudarthroses. Complications included 2 returns to the operating room, one for CSF leakage and the other for hardware pullout. There were no wound infections, pneumonia, deep venous thrombosis, or new neurological deficits. However, of all patients, 30.4% experienced new thigh numbness, dysesthesias, pain, or weakness, and in one patient these new symptoms were persistent.
CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive surgical treatment of adult deformities is a promising method for reducing surgical morbidity. Numerous challenges exist, as the surgical technique does not yet allow for all correction maneuvers used in open surgery. However, as the techniques are advanced, the applicability of minimally invasive surgery for this population will likely be expanded and will afford the opportunity for reduced complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20192721     DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS09286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  51 in total

1.  Minimally invasive scoliosis surgery: an innovative technique in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Vishal Sarwahi; Adam L Wollowick; Etan P Sugarman; Jonathan J Horn; Melanie Gambassi; Terry D Amaral
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2011-08-11

2.  Is the lateral transpsoas approach feasible for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis?

Authors:  Carlos Castro; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Luis Marchi; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Percutaneous scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt; Christian Schäfer; Jörg Beyerlein; Lothar Wiesner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Anterior elongation as a minimally invasive alternative for sagittal imbalance-a case series.

Authors:  Luis Marchi; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Carlos Castro; Thiago Coutinho; Etevaldo Coutinho; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-12-13

5.  Limitations and complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery in adult deformity.

Authors:  Jacob Januszewski; Andrew C Vivas; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

6.  Reoperation rates in minimally invasive, hybrid and open surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity with minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  D Kojo Hamilton; Adam S Kanter; Bryan D Bolinger; Gregory M Mundis; Stacie Nguyen; Praveen V Mummaneni; Neel Anand; Richard G Fessler; Peter G Passias; Paul Park; Frank La Marca; Juan S Uribe; Michael Y Wang; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Christopher I Shaffrey; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  [Extreme lateral interbody fusion. Indication, surgical technique, outcomes and specific complications].

Authors:  Markus Quante; Henry Halm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 9.  Economic impact of minimally invasive lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Christoph P Hofstetter; Anna S Hofer; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

Review 10.  Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.