Literature DB >> 21834988

Minimally invasive scoliosis surgery: an innovative technique in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Vishal Sarwahi1, Adam L Wollowick, Etan P Sugarman, Jonathan J Horn, Melanie Gambassi, Terry D Amaral.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive spine surgery is becoming more common in the treatment of adult lumbar degenerative disorders. Minimally invasive techniques have been utilized for multilevel pathology, including adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis. The next logical step is to apply minimally invasive surgical techniques to the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, there are significant technical challenges of performing minimally invasive surgery on this patient population. For more than two years, we have been utilizing minimally invasive spine surgery techniques in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. We have developed the present technique to allow for utilization of all standard reduction maneuvers through three small midline skin incisions. Our technique allows easy passage of contoured rods, placement of pedicle screws without image guidance, and allows adequate facet osteotomy to enable fusion. There are multiple potential advantages of this technique, including: less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, earlier mobilization, and relatively less pain and need for pain medication. The operative time needed to complete this surgery is longer. We feel that a minimally invasive approach, although technically challenging, is a feasible option in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Although there are multiple perceived benefits, long term data is needed before it can be recommended for routine use.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21834988      PMCID: PMC3170270          DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-6-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scoliosis        ISSN: 1748-7161


  17 in total

Review 1.  Results of thoracoscopic instrumented fusion versus conventional posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing selective thoracic fusion.

Authors:  Hee-Kit Wong; Hwan-Tak Hee; Zhirong Yu; David Wong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Thoracic pedicle screw placement: free-hand technique.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans.

Authors:  Debdut Biswas; Jesse E Bible; Michael Bohan; Andrew K Simpson; Peter G Whang; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Bone grafting options in children.

Authors:  Randal R Betz; William F Lavelle; Amer F Samdani
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine.

Authors:  L L Wiltse; J G Bateman; R H Hutchinson; W E Nelson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Elias Dakwar; Rafael F Cardona; Donald A Smith; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Y Wang; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Postoperative ketorolac does not predispose to pseudoarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Daniel J Sucato; John F Lovejoy; Sundeep Agrawal; Emily Elerson; Trudi Nelson; Anna McClung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Direct vertebral rotation: a new technique of three-dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Sang-Min Lee; Se-Il Suk; Ewy-Ryong Chung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Eli M Baron; Gowriharan Thaiyananthan; Kunwar Khalsa; Theodore B Goldstein
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2008-10
View more
  10 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgery versus standard posterior approach for Lenke Type 1-4 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter, retrospective study.

Authors:  Gao Si; Tong Li; Yu Wang; Xiaoguang Liu; Chunde Li; Miao Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Delayed presentation of infected common iliac artery pseudoaneurysm caused by malpositioned pedicle screw after minimally invasive scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Seung-Woo Suh; Gang-Un Kim; Hoon-Nyun Lee; Jae Hyuk Yang; Dong-Gune Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive scoliosis surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective case series of 84 patients.

Authors:  Jae Hyuk Yang; Dong-Gune Chang; Seung Woo Suh; Neelesh Damani; Hoon-Nyun Lee; Jungwook Lim; Frederick Mun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery with Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Single Surgeon Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Hamid Abbasi; Lynn Miller; Ali Abbasi; Vali Orandi; Kamran Khaghany
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-06-25

5.  Review of Physical Activity Benefits and Potential Considerations for Individuals with Surgical Fusion of Spine for Scoliosis.

Authors:  Rumit Singh Kakar; Kathy J Simpson; Bhibha M DAS; Cathleen N Brown
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 6.  Posterior minimally invasive scoliosis surgery versus the standard posterior approach for the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Honghao Yang; Xiangyuan Jia; Yong Hai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery Is a Feasible Option for Management of Idiopathic Scoliosis and Has Equivalent Outcomes to Open Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Abduljabbar Alhammoud; Yahya Alborno; Abdul Moeen Baco; Yahya Azhar Othman; Yoji Ogura; Michael Steinhaus; Evan D Sheha; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 8.  Novel Surgical Technique for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery.

Authors:  Sung Cheol Park; Sei Wook Son; Jae Hyuk Yang; Dong-Gune Chang; Seung Woo Suh; Yunjin Nam; Hong Jin Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery: A Novel Technique in Patients with Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

Authors:  Vishal Sarwahi; Terry Amaral; Stephen Wendolowski; Rachel Gecelter; Melanie Gambassi; Christos Plakas; Benita Liao; Sarika Kalantre; Chhavi Katyal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Minimally invasive spine surgery in the pediatric and adolescent population: A case series.

Authors:  Richard Menger; Matthew I Hefner; Amey R Savardekar; Anil Nanda; Anthony Sin
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-06-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.