Literature DB >> 20191947

Re-examining respect for human research participants.

Neal W Dickert1.   

Abstract

The demands of respect for persons when conducting clinical research are often reduced to respect for autonomy. In this paper, I re-examine the concept of respect for persons in light of important intuitions from our ordinary language usage of respect. I propose that there are many ways to respect persons as persons and that the core elements of respect for persons are: appreciating what is valuable or important about a person, recognizing the constraints or demands that such a valuation places on one's own conduct, and acting in a way that expresses that recognition. On this account, in addition to autonomous agency, respect demands attention to important subjective experiences, persons' existence as part of communities, and considerations of comportment. This account has important implications for the conduct of clinical research with persons who are autonomous as well as with those who are not. Its implications, however, are different for these two populations, particularly with regard to concerns about well-being.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20191947     DOI: 10.1353/ken.0.0295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN: 1054-6863


  10 in total

1.  Understanding respect: learning from patients.

Authors:  N W Dickert; N E Kass
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The Rhetoric of the 'Passive Patient' in Indian Medical Negligence Cases.

Authors:  Supriya Subramani
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2019-12-04

3.  Cancer patients' respect experiences in relation to perceived communication behaviours from hospital staff: analysis of the 2012-2013 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey.

Authors:  Claudine Clucas
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Is deidentification sufficient to protect health privacy in research?

Authors:  Mark A Rothstein
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Shared Governance Embedded in Population Ethics Can Enhance Health Equity Research at Both Micro and Macro Levels.

Authors:  Stephen O Sodeke; Clayton C Yates
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.229

6.  Thematic analysis of cardiac care patients' explanations for declining contribution to a genomic research-based biobank.

Authors:  Pamela Holtzclaw Williams; Lynne S Nemeth; Jennifer E Sanner; Lorraine Q Frazier
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 7.  Why we need community engagement in medical research.

Authors:  Jessica K Holzer; Lauren Ellis; Maria W Merritt
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Exploring the impact of ineligibility on individuals expressing interest in a trial aimed at improving daily functioning regarding perceptions of self, research and likelihood of future participation.

Authors:  Christopher P Dwyer; Helen McAneney; Fionnuala M Rogers; Robert Joyce; Sinéad M Hynes
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Community engagement in kidney research: Guatemalan experience.

Authors:  Angie Aguilar-González; Randall Lou-Meda; André Chocó-Cedillos; Louise Moist
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.585

10.  Community engagement and the human infrastructure of global health research.

Authors:  Katherine F King; Pamela Kolopack; Maria W Merritt; James V Lavery
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.652

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.