Literature DB >> 20191399

Contribution of two molecular assays as compared to selective culture for MRSA screening in a low MRSA prevalence population.

E Nulens1, P Descheemaeker, R H Deurenberg, E E Stobberingh, B Gordts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the prompt detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers upon admission is fundamental in the MRSA prevention strategy of our hospital, the infection control team is eagerly seeking the most sensitive and rapid screening method. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of two molecular techniques with a conventional MRSA-selective culture test (Bio-Rad chromogenic MRSASelect) in order to elucidate the suitability of the assays specifically in an expected low MRSA prevalence population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The anterior nares and throat of 500 patients and visitors attending the emergency department of Sint-Jan General Hospital between May and June 2007 were sampled, and MRSA carriage was determined by selective culture after enrichment and the BD GeneOhm StaphSR and the Cepheid Xpert MRSA assays.
RESULTS: Eight MRSA carriers were detected by selective culture (1.6% prevalence). The sensitivity, specificity, positive [corrected] predictive value, and negative [corrected] predictive value were 62.5, 99.0, 50.0, and 99.4% for BD GeneOhm StaphSR and 62.5, 97.7, 31.3, and 99.4% for Cepheid Xpert MRSA, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that MRSA rapid screening techniques must be interpreted cautiously in a low-prevalence population, as the sensitivity is lower than in selected high-risk populations. MRSA carriers detected with molecular techniques must be confirmed by conventional culture methods for follow-up. The specificity and negative predictive value indicate that molecular rapid methods are worthwhile to be considered in MRSA-preventive strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20191399     DOI: 10.1007/s15010-009-9117-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  8 in total

1.  Correlation between the resistance genotype determined by multiplex PCR assays and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  F Martineau; F J Picard; N Lansac; C Ménard; P H Roy; M Ouellette; M G Bergeron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Be aware of the possibility of false-positive results in single-locus PCR assays for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jan Rupp; Ines Fenner; Werner Solbach; Jens Gieffers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Current trends in rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant enterococcus species.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Kelly Haccuria; Mindy Michiels; Margareta Ieven; Claire Poyart; Waleria Hryniewicz; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Controlled evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diverse mucocutaneous specimens.

Authors:  Nour de San; Olivier Denis; Marie-Fabrice Gasasira; Ricardo De Mendonça; Claire Nonhoff; Marc J Struelens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci.

Authors:  A Huletsky; R Giroux; V Rossbach; M Gagnon; M Vaillancourt; M Bernier; F Gagnon; K Truchon; M Bastien; F J Picard; A van Belkum; M Ouellette; P H Roy; M G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  The molecular evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R H Deurenberg; C Vink; S Kalenic; A W Friedrich; C A Bruggeman; E E Stobberingh
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.067

7.  Molecular and epidemiological evidence for spread of multiresistant methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains in hospitals.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Donnio; Frédéric Février; Pablo Bifani; Marie Dehem; Christèle Kervégant; Nathalie Wilhelm; Anne-Lise Gautier-Lerestif; Nathalie Lafforgue; Michel Cormier; Alain Le Coustumier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  The evolution of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ruud H Deurenberg; Ellen E Stobberingh
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.342

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Xpert MRSA assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nares swabs of geriatric hospitalized patients and failure to detect a specific SCCmec type IV variant.

Authors:  C Laurent; P Bogaerts; D Schoevaerdts; O Denis; A Deplano; C Swine; M J Struelens; Y Glupczynski
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.

Authors:  A Tübbicke; C Hübner; A Kramer; N-O Hübner; S Fleßa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  MRSA screening by the Xpert MRSA PCR assay: pooling samples of the nose, throat, and groin increases the sensitivity of detection without increasing the laboratory costs.

Authors:  D S Blanc; I Nahimana; G Zanetti; G Greub
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Multicenter Evaluation of the Xpert MRSA NxG Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Nasal Swabs.

Authors:  Melanie L Yarbrough; David K Warren; Karen Allen; Dennis Burkholder; Robert Daum; Curtis Donskey; Dennis Knaack; Anthony LaMarca; Larissa May; Loren G Miller; David M Parenti; Lance Peterson; Thean Yen Tan; Raymond Widen; Diana R Hernandez; Donna M Wolk; C A Burnham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Positive predictive value of the Xpert MRSA assay diagnostic for universal patient screening at hospital admission: influence of the local ecology.

Authors:  S Roisin; C Laurent; C Nonhoff; A Deplano; M Hallin; B Byl; M J Struelens; O Denis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Clinical Relevance of Xpert MRSA/SA in Guiding Therapeutic Decisions for Staphylococcal Infections: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Analysis.

Authors:  Suvash Chandra Ojha; Ke Chen; Changfeng Sun; Sarfraz Ahmed; Yun-Jian Sheng; Cun-Liang Deng
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2022-04-22

7.  Prevalence dependent calibration of a predictive model for nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Johannes Elias; Peter U Heuschmann; Corinna Schmitt; Frithjof Eckhardt; Hartmut Boehm; Sebastian Maier; Annette Kolb-Mäurer; Hubertus Riedmiller; Wolfgang Müllges; Christoph Weisser; Christian Wunder; Matthias Frosch; Ulrich Vogel
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Point-of-care universal screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a cluster-randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  P J Wu; D Jeyaratnam; O Tosas; B S Cooper; G L French
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.926

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.