Literature DB >> 20190062

The impact of electronic medical records data sources on an adverse drug event quality measure.

Michael G Kahn1, Daksha Ranade.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of billing and clinical data extracted from an electronic medical record system on the calculation of an adverse drug event (ADE) quality measure approved for use in The Joint Commission's ORYX program, a mandatory national hospital quality reporting system.
DESIGN: The Child Health Corporation of America's "Use of Rescue Agents-ADE Trigger" quality measure uses medication billing data contained in the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) data warehouse to create The Joint Commission-approved quality measure. Using a similar query, we calculated the quality measure using PHIS plus four data sources extracted from our electronic medical record (EMR) system: medications charged, medication orders placed, medication orders with associated charges (orders charged), and medications administered. MEASUREMENTS: Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical for all queries. Denominators and numerators were calculated using the five data sets. The reported quality measure is the ADE rate (numerator/denominator).
RESULTS: Significant differences in denominators, numerators, and rates were calculated from different data sources within a single institution's EMR. Differences were due to both common clinical practices that may be similar across institutions and unique workflow practices not likely to be present at any other institution. The magnitude of the differences would significantly alter the national comparative ranking of our institution compared to other PHIS institutions.
CONCLUSIONS: More detailed clinical information may result in quality measures that are not comparable across institutions due institution-specific workflow, differences that are exposed using EMR-derived data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190062      PMCID: PMC3000787          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  23 in total

1.  Special report--ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation. Joint Commission introduces new requirements to integrate performance measurement into accreditation process.

Authors: 
Journal:  Jt Comm Perspect       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb

2.  Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger tools.

Authors:  R K Resar; J D Rozich; D Classen
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

3.  Measuring errors and adverse events in health care.

Authors:  Eric J Thomas; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Evaluating the patient safety indicators: how well do they perform on Veterans Health Administration data?

Authors:  Amy K Rosen; Peter Rivard; Shibei Zhao; Susan Loveland; Dennis Tsilimingras; Cindy L Christiansen; Anne Elixhauser; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Description of a computerized adverse drug event monitor using a hospital information system.

Authors:  D C Classen; S L Pestotnik; R S Evans; J P Burke
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  1992-09

6.  Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm.

Authors:  J D Rozich; C R Haraden; R K Resar
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-06

7.  Relevance of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators for children's hospitals.

Authors:  Aileen Sedman; J Mitchell Harris; Kristine Schulz; Ellen Schwalenstocker; Denise Remus; Matthew Scanlon; Vinita Bahl
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  A comparison of hospital adverse events identified by three widely used detection methods.

Authors:  James M Naessens; Claudia R Campbell; Jeanne M Huddleston; Bjorn P Berg; John J Lefante; Arthur R Williams; Richard A Culbertson
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.038

9.  Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients.

Authors:  D C Classen; S L Pestotnik; R S Evans; J P Burke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research.

Authors:  J G Jollis; M Ancukiewicz; E R DeLong; D B Pryor; L H Muhlbaier; D B Mark
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  15 in total

1.  Navigating a ship with a broken compass: evaluating standard algorithms to measure patient safety.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hefner; Timothy R Huerta; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Barbara Barash; Tina Latimer; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Variation in outcomes of quality measurement by data source.

Authors:  Heather Angier; Rachel Gold; Charles Gallia; Allison Casciato; Carrie J Tillotson; Miguel Marino; Rita Mangione-Smith; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Extracting autism spectrum disorder data from the electronic health record.

Authors:  Ruth A Bush; Cynthia D Connelly; Alexa Pérez; Halsey Barlow; George J Chiang
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Diabetes and asthma case identification, validation, and representativeness when using electronic health data to construct registries for comparative effectiveness and epidemiologic research.

Authors:  Jay R Desai; Pingsheng Wu; Greg A Nichols; Tracy A Lieu; Patrick J O'Connor
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  William R Hersh; Mark G Weiner; Peter J Embi; Judith R Logan; Philip R O Payne; Elmer V Bernstam; Harold P Lehmann; George Hripcsak; Timothy H Hartzog; James J Cimino; Joel H Saltz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The Analytic Information Warehouse (AIW): a platform for analytics using electronic health record data.

Authors:  Andrew R Post; Tahsin Kurc; Sharath Cholleti; Jingjing Gao; Xia Lin; William Bornstein; Dedra Cantrell; David Levine; Sam Hohmann; Joel H Saltz
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Clinical research informatics: a conceptual perspective.

Authors:  Michael G Kahn; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Validity of electronic health record-derived quality measurement for performance monitoring.

Authors:  Amanda Parsons; Colleen McCullough; Jason Wang; Sarah Shih
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Role of Pharmacovigilance in India: An overview.

Authors:  Sanvidhan G Suke; Prabhat Kosta; Harsh Negi
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2015-07-01

10.  e-Measures: insight into the challenges and opportunities of automating publicly reported quality measures.

Authors:  Terhilda Garrido; Sudheen Kumar; John Lekas; Mark Lindberg; Dhanyaja Kadiyala; Alan Whippy; Barbara Crawford; Jed Weissberg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.