BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential for evaluating treatment effects on health-related quality of life and symptoms from the patient's perspective. This study sought to evaluate the psychometric properties of the nine-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Symptom Index (FCSI-9) in a metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) population. METHODS: The FCSI-9 and EQ-5D were administered every 2-4 weeks to mCRC subjects in a phase III clinical trial. Three hundred ninety-one mCRC subjects completed the questionnaires at baseline and at least one follow-up assessment. Internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity, known groups validity, responsiveness, and the minimum important difference (MID) of the FCSI-9 were evaluated. RESULTS: The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the FCSI-9 were acceptable (0.81 and 0.76, respectively). Construct validity was supported based on moderate correlations with the EQ-5D. Known groups validity was evaluated by examining the FCSI-9 scores of subjects categorized by their Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) score. Subjects with better PS scores reported significantly higher FCSI-9 scores than those with lower PS scores at both baseline and week 8. Responsiveness, as measured by Guyatt's statistic, was 0.77 from baseline to week 8 and 0.60 from week 4 to week 12. Considering all data together, the MID of the FCSI-9 is estimated to be in the range of 1.5-3.0 points. CONCLUSION: Results provide preliminary evidence of the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the FCSI-9.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential for evaluating treatment effects on health-related quality of life and symptoms from the patient's perspective. This study sought to evaluate the psychometric properties of the nine-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Symptom Index (FCSI-9) in a metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) population. METHODS: The FCSI-9 and EQ-5D were administered every 2-4 weeks to mCRC subjects in a phase III clinical trial. Three hundred ninety-one mCRC subjects completed the questionnaires at baseline and at least one follow-up assessment. Internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity, known groups validity, responsiveness, and the minimum important difference (MID) of the FCSI-9 were evaluated. RESULTS: The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the FCSI-9 were acceptable (0.81 and 0.76, respectively). Construct validity was supported based on moderate correlations with the EQ-5D. Known groups validity was evaluated by examining the FCSI-9 scores of subjects categorized by their Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) score. Subjects with better PS scores reported significantly higher FCSI-9 scores than those with lower PS scores at both baseline and week 8. Responsiveness, as measured by Guyatt's statistic, was 0.77 from baseline to week 8 and 0.60 from week 4 to week 12. Considering all data together, the MID of the FCSI-9 is estimated to be in the range of 1.5-3.0 points. CONCLUSION: Results provide preliminary evidence of the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the FCSI-9.
Authors: Neil Aaronson; Jordi Alonso; Audrey Burnam; Kathleen N Lohr; Donald L Patrick; Edward Perrin; Ruth E Stein Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: D F Cella; D S Tulsky; G Gray; B Sarafian; E Linn; A Bonomi; M Silberman; S B Yellen; P Winicour; J Brannon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas M Atkinson; Charissa F Andreotti; Kailey E Roberts; Rebecca M Saracino; Marisol Hernandez; Ethan Basch Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: David Cella; Zeeshan Butt; Hedy Lee Kindler; Charles S Fuchs; Sarah Bray; Arie Barlev; Alan Oglesby Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2012-06-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: M Moskovitz; K Jao; J Su; M C Brown; H Naik; L Eng; T Wang; J Kuo; Y Leung; W Xu; N Mittmann; L Moody; L Barbera; G Devins; M Li; D Howell; G Liu Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Dawn Odom; Beth Barber; Lee Bennett; Marc Peeters; Zhongyun Zhao; James Kaye; Michael Wolf; Jeffrey Wiezorek Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2010-12-29 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Cristiane Menezes Sirna Fregnani; José Humberto Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani; Maria do Rosário Dias de Oliveira Latorre; Ana Maria de Almeida Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jessica Alonso-Molero; Antonio J Molina; Jose Juan Jiménez-Moleón; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Vicente Martin; Victor Moreno; Pilar Amiano; Eva Ardanaz; Silvia de Sanjose; Inmaculada Salcedo; Guillermo Fernandez-Tardon; Juan Alguacil; Dolores Salas; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Maria Dolores Chirlaque; Nuria Aragonés; Gemma Castaño-Vinyals; Marina Pollán; Manolis Kogevinas; Javier Llorca Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 2.692