Literature DB >> 8930436

Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria.

K N Lohr1, N K Aaronson, J Alonso, M A Burnam, D L Patrick, E B Perrin, J S Roberts.   

Abstract

The Medical Outcomes Trust is a depository and distributor of high-quality, standardized, health outcomes measurement instruments to national and international health communities. Every instrument in the Trust library is reviewed by the Scientific Advisory Committee against a rigorous set of eight attributes. These attributes consist of the following: (1) conceptual and measurement model; (2) reliability; (3) validity; (4) responsiveness; (5) interpretability; (6) respondent and administrative burden; (7) alternative forms; and (8) cultural and language adaptations. In addition to a full description of each attribute, we discuss uses of these criteria beyond evaluation of existing instruments and lessons learned in the first few rounds of instrument review against these criteria.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8930436     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80054-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  125 in total

Review 1.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Is subjective well-being a useful parameter for allocating resources among public interventions?

Authors:  A Gandjour
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Applying cognitive design principles to formatting HRQOL instruments.

Authors:  P A Mullin; K N Lohr; B W Bresnahan; P McNulty
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Development and validation of a short questionnaire in community acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  R El Moussaoui; B C Opmeer; P M M Bossuyt; P Speelman; C A J M de Borgie; J M Prins
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Shortening the VSP-A: preliminary development of the VSP-A12, a 12-item short-form.

Authors:  C Sapin; S Antoniotti; M C Simeoni; A Clément; M El Khammar; P Auquier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Development and validation of an acceptability and satisfaction questionnaire for a contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing.

Authors:  Annoesjka Novák; Christine de la Loge; Linda Abetz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology?

Authors:  Jeremy C Hobart; Stefan J Cano; Thomas T Warner; Alan J Thompson
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Qualitative attributes and measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires: a checklist.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Lidwine B Mokkink; Mireille N M van Poppel; Mai J M Chinapaw; Willem van Mechelen; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Psychometric evaluation of the functional assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) questionnaire and its usefulness in clinical trials.

Authors:  Muriel Viala-Danten; Dominique Dubois; Hélène Gilet; Silas Martin; Katrien Peeters; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.