Literature DB >> 1611572

So few medical schools, so many clerk rating systems!

P J McLeod.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1611572      PMCID: PMC1492266     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  A national survey of grading systems used in medicine clerkships.

Authors:  G J Magarian; D J Mazur
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  A modified honours grading system and the selection of postgraduate trainees.

Authors:  J M Turnbull
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  AAMC program to promote improved evaluation of students during clinical education.

Authors:  X Tonesk
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1986-09

4.  An AAMC pilot study by 10 medical schools of clinical evaluation of students.

Authors:  X Tonesk; R G Buchanan
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1987-09

5.  Resident and faculty differences in student evaluations: implications for changes in a clerkship grading system.

Authors:  J D Carline; C E Cook; E S Lennard; M Siever; G M Coluccio; N L Norman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Relationships between performance in medical school and first postgraduate year.

Authors:  J Veloski; M W Herman; J S Gonnella; C Zeleznik; W F Kellow
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1979-12

7.  A practical method to enhance fairness of clerkship ratings.

Authors:  J L Delk; G J Cason; W G Reese
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1985-12
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Preferences of program directors for evaluation of candidates for postgraduate training.

Authors:  J L Provan; L Cuttress
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Distribution of Honors Grades Across Fourth-year Emergency Medicine Clerkships.

Authors:  Matthew M Hall; Nicole M Dubosh; Edward Ullman
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2017-03-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.