Literature DB >> 20188357

Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays.

Nathan R Treff1, Jing Su, Xin Tao, Brynn Levy, Richard T Scott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray protocol for accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, and blinded study.
SETTING: Academic reproductive medicine center. PATIENT(S): Multiple euploid and aneuploid cell lines were obtained from a public repository and blastomeres were obtained after biopsy of cleavage stage embryos from 78 patients undergoing IVF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Accuracy of copy number assignment and consistency of individual SNPs, whole chromosomes, and single cell aneuploidy status were determined. INTERVENTION(S): None. RESULT(S): Single cells extracted from karyotypically defined cell lines provided 99.2% accuracy for individual SNPs, 99.8% accuracy for whole chromosomes, and 98.6% accuracy when applying a quality control threshold for the overall assignment of aneuploidy status. The concurrence for more than 80 million SNPs in 335 single blastomeres was 96.5%. CONCLUSION(S): We have established and validated a SNP microarray-based single cell aneuploidy screening technology. Clinical validation studies are underway to determine the predictive value of this methodology.
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20188357     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  56 in total

1.  Microarray analysis of copy number variation in single cells.

Authors:  Peter Konings; Evelyne Vanneste; Sigrun Jackmaert; Michèle Ampe; Geert Verbeke; Yves Moreau; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Polar body morphology is not predictive of its cell division origin.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott; Jing Su; Jessyca Campos; John Stevens; William Schoolcraft; Mandy Katz-Jaffe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  SNP array-based copy number and genotype analyses for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human unbalanced translocations.

Authors:  Chris M J van Uum; Servi J C Stevens; Joseph C F M Dreesen; Marion Drüsedau; Hubert J Smeets; Bertien Hollanders-Crombach; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Joep P M Geraedts; John J M Engelen; Edith Coonen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Genomic instability during reprogramming by nuclear transfer is DNA replication dependent.

Authors:  Gloryn Chia; Judith Agudo; Nathan Treff; Mark V Sauer; David Billing; Brian D Brown; Richard Baer; Dieter Egli
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Next Generation Sequencing-Based Comprehensive Chromosome Screening in Mouse Polar Bodies, Oocytes, and Embryos.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Rebecca L Krisher; Xin Tao; Heather Garnsey; Chelsea Bohrer; Elena Silva; Jessica Landis; Deanne Taylor; Richard T Scott; Teresa K Woodruff; Francesca E Duncan
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  An algorithm for determining the origin of trisomy and the positions of chiasmata from SNP genotype data.

Authors:  Alem S Gabriel; Terry J Hassold; Alan R Thornhill; Nabeel A Affara; Alan H Handyside; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 8.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts.

Authors:  L E Northrop; N R Treff; B Levy; R T Scott
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Brynn Levy; Jing Su; Lesley E Northrop; Xin Tao; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.