Literature DB >> 28263958

Genomic instability during reprogramming by nuclear transfer is DNA replication dependent.

Gloryn Chia1, Judith Agudo2, Nathan Treff3, Mark V Sauer4,5, David Billing6, Brian D Brown2, Richard Baer6, Dieter Egli1.   

Abstract

Somatic cells can be reprogrammed to a pluripotent state by nuclear transfer into oocytes, yet developmental arrest often occurs. While incomplete transcriptional reprogramming is known to cause developmental failure, reprogramming also involves concurrent changes in cell cycle progression and nuclear structure. Here we study cellular reprogramming events in human and mouse nuclear transfer embryos prior to embryonic genome activation. We show that genetic instability marked by frequent chromosome segregation errors and DNA damage arise prior to, and independent of, transcriptional activity. These errors occur following transition through DNA replication and are repaired by BRCA1. In the absence of mitotic nuclear remodelling, DNA replication is delayed and errors are exacerbated in subsequent mitosis. These results demonstrate that independent of gene expression, cell-type-specific features of cell cycle progression constitute a barrier sufficient to prevent the transition from one cell type to another during reprogramming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28263958      PMCID: PMC5613662          DOI: 10.1038/ncb3485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Cell Biol        ISSN: 1465-7392            Impact factor:   28.824


  47 in total

1.  Reprogramming of DNA replication timing.

Authors:  Yoel Shufaro; Orly Lacham-Kaplan; Ben-Zion Tzuberi; John McLaughlin; Alan Trounson; Howard Cedar; Benjamin E Reubinoff
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 6.277

2.  Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells.

Authors:  I Wilmut; A E Schnieke; J McWhir; A J Kind; K H Campbell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Incomplete reactivation of Oct4-related genes in mouse embryos cloned from somatic nuclei.

Authors:  Alex Bortvin; Kevin Eggan; Helen Skaletsky; Hidenori Akutsu; Deborah L Berry; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; David C Page; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53-p21 pathway.

Authors:  Hyenjong Hong; Kazutoshi Takahashi; Tomoko Ichisaka; Takashi Aoi; Osami Kanagawa; Masato Nakagawa; Keisuke Okita; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Human oocytes reprogram somatic cells to a pluripotent state.

Authors:  Scott Noggle; Ho-Lim Fung; Athurva Gore; Hector Martinez; Kathleen Crumm Satriani; Robert Prosser; Kiboong Oum; Daniel Paull; Sarah Druckenmiller; Matthew Freeby; Ellen Greenberg; Kun Zhang; Robin Goland; Mark V Sauer; Rudolph L Leibel; Dieter Egli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Nuclear genome transfer in human oocytes eliminates mitochondrial DNA variants.

Authors:  Daniel Paull; Valentina Emmanuele; Keren A Weiss; Nathan Treff; Latoya Stewart; Haiqing Hua; Matthew Zimmer; David J Kahler; Robin S Goland; Scott A Noggle; Robert Prosser; Michio Hirano; Mark V Sauer; Dieter Egli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression.

Authors:  Asako Sakaue-Sawano; Hiroshi Kurokawa; Toshifumi Morimura; Aki Hanyu; Hiroshi Hama; Hatsuki Osawa; Saori Kashiwagi; Kiyoko Fukami; Takaki Miyata; Hiroyuki Miyoshi; Takeshi Imamura; Masaharu Ogawa; Hisao Masai; Atsushi Miyawaki
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The transition from maternal to embryonic control in the 2-cell mouse embryo.

Authors:  G Flach; M H Johnson; P R Braude; R A Taylor; V N Bolton
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Replication timing: a fingerprint for cell identity and pluripotency.

Authors:  Tyrone Ryba; Ichiro Hiratani; Takayo Sasaki; Dana Battaglia; Michael Kulik; Jinfeng Zhang; Stephen Dalton; David M Gilbert
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  BRCA1 haploinsufficiency for replication stress suppression in primary cells.

Authors:  Shailja Pathania; Sangeeta Bade; Morwenna Le Guillou; Karly Burke; Rachel Reed; Christian Bowman-Colin; Ying Su; David T Ting; Kornelia Polyak; Andrea L Richardson; Jean Feunteun; Judy E Garber; David M Livingston
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  13 in total

1.  Tying genetic stability to cell identity.

Authors:  Daniela Georgieva; Dieter Egli
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Efficient SNP editing in haploid human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Lauren Zakarin Safier; Michael V Zuccaro; Dietrich Egli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Compensating human subjects providing oocytes for stem cell research: 9-year experience and outcomes.

Authors:  L Zakarin Safier; A Gumer; M Kline; D Egli; M V Sauer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  iPSC modeling of rare pediatric disorders.

Authors:  Bethany A Freel; Jordan N Sheets; Kevin R Francis
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  In vitro modeling of glioblastoma initiation using PDGF-AA and p53-null neural progenitors.

Authors:  Alexandra K Bohm; Jessica DePetro; Carmen E Binding; Amanda Gerber; Nicholas Chahley; N Dan Berger; Mathaeus Ware; Kaitlin Thomas; U Senapathi; Shazreh Bukhari; Cindy Chen; Erin Chahley; Cameron Grisdale; Sam Lawn; Yaping Yu; Raymond Wong; Yaoqing Shen; Hiba Omairi; Reza Mirzaei; Nourah Alshatti; Haley Pedersen; Wee Yong; Samuel Weiss; Jennifer Chan; P J Cimino; John Kelly; Steve Jones; Eric Holland; Michael Blough; Gregory Cairncross
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Parental genome unification is highly error-prone in mammalian embryos.

Authors:  Tommaso Cavazza; Yuko Takeda; Antonio Z Politi; Magomet Aushev; Patrick Aldag; Clara Baker; Meenakshi Choudhary; Jonas Bucevičius; Gražvydas Lukinavičius; Kay Elder; Martyn Blayney; Andrea Lucas-Hahn; Heiner Niemann; Mary Herbert; Melina Schuh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Genome stabilization by RAD51-stimulatory compound 1 enhances efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer-mediated reprogramming and full-term development of cloned mouse embryos.

Authors:  Ah Reum Lee; Ji-Hoon Park; Sung Han Shim; Kwonho Hong; Hyeonwoo La; Kyung-Soon Park; Dong Ryul Lee
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.831

8.  Somatic cell nuclear transfer in non-enucleated goldfish oocytes: understanding DNA fate during oocyte activation and first cellular division.

Authors:  Charlène Rouillon; Alexandra Depincé; Nathalie Chênais; Pierre-Yves Le Bail; Catherine Labbé
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Lessons Learned from Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.

Authors:  Chantel Gouveia; Carin Huyser; Dieter Egli; Michael S Pepper
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Chromatin architecture reorganization in murine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos.

Authors:  Mo Chen; Qianshu Zhu; Chong Li; Xiaochen Kou; Yanhong Zhao; Yanhe Li; Ruimin Xu; Lei Yang; Lingyue Yang; Liang Gu; Hong Wang; Xiaoyu Liu; Cizhong Jiang; Shaorong Gao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.