BACKGROUND: This study assessed the feasibility of a protocol-driven written clinical pathway for multidisciplinary postoperative management after oesophagectomy for oesophageal neoplasia, and examined whether the application of such a protocol could shorten hospital stay and reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal neoplasia were divided into those treated between 2003 and 2008 to whom a clinical pathway was applied for postoperative management (group 1), and a control group treated between 1998 and 2002 when no clinical pathway was applied (group 2). RESULTS: There were 74 patients in each group. Morbidity rates were similar in the two groups: 31 per cent in group 1 and 38 per cent in group 2. There were more pulmonary complications in group 2 (23 versus 14 per cent; P = 0.025). One patient (1 per cent) in group 1 and four (5 per cent) in group 2 died after surgery (P = 0.010). The median (range) length of hospital stay was 9 (5-98) days for group 1 and 13 (8-106) days in group 2 (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Use of a written clinical pathway in patients undergoing oesophageal resection significantly reduced pulmonary complications, postoperative mortality and hospital stay. Copyright 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.
BACKGROUND: This study assessed the feasibility of a protocol-driven written clinical pathway for multidisciplinary postoperative management after oesophagectomy for oesophageal neoplasia, and examined whether the application of such a protocol could shorten hospital stay and reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal neoplasia were divided into those treated between 2003 and 2008 to whom a clinical pathway was applied for postoperative management (group 1), and a control group treated between 1998 and 2002 when no clinical pathway was applied (group 2). RESULTS: There were 74 patients in each group. Morbidity rates were similar in the two groups: 31 per cent in group 1 and 38 per cent in group 2. There were more pulmonary complications in group 2 (23 versus 14 per cent; P = 0.025). One patient (1 per cent) in group 1 and four (5 per cent) in group 2 died after surgery (P = 0.010). The median (range) length of hospital stay was 9 (5-98) days for group 1 and 13 (8-106) days in group 2 (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Use of a written clinical pathway in patients undergoing oesophageal resection significantly reduced pulmonary complications, postoperative mortality and hospital stay. Copyright 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.
Authors: Christina Haane; Wolf Arif Mardin; Britta Schmitz; Sameer Dhayat; Richard Hummel; Norbert Senninger; Christina Schleicher; Soeren Torge Mees Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Ines Gockel; Constantin Johannes Ahlbrand; Michael Arras; Elke Maria Schreiber; Hauke Lang Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Diego Porras; David W Brown; Rahul Rathod; Kevin Friedman; Kimberly Gauvreau; James E Lock; Jesse J Esch; Lisa Bergersen; Audrey C Marshall Journal: Congenit Heart Dis Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 2.007
Authors: Marion van der Kolk; Mark van den Boogaard; Femke Becking-Verhaar; Hettie Custers; Hans van der Hoeven; Peter Pickkers; Kees van Laarhoven Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Rachel L G M Blom; Mark van Heijl; Willem A Bemelman; Markus W Hollmann; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Olivier R C Busch; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Sheraz R Markar; Henner Schmidt; Sonia Kunz; Artur Bodnar; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 3.452