Literature DB >> 20186402

Robot-assisted modifications of gait in healthy individuals.

Seok Hun Kim1, Sai K Banala, Elizabeth A Brackbill, Sunil K Agrawal, Vijaya Krishnamoorthy, John P Scholz.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether short-term modifications of gait could be induced in healthy adults and whether a combination of kinetic (a compliant force resisting deviation of the foot from the prescribed footpath) and visual guidance was superior to either kinetic guidance or visual guidance alone in producing this modification. Thirty-nine healthy adults, 20-33 years old, were randomly assigned to the three groups receiving six 10-min blocks of treadmill training requiring them to modify their footpath to match a scaled-down path. Changes of the footpath, specific joint events and joint moments were analyzed. Persons receiving combined kinetic and visual guidance showed larger modifications of their gait patterns that were maintained longer, persisting up to 2 h after intervening over-ground activities, than did persons receiving training with primarily kinetic guidance or with visual guidance alone. The results emphasize the short-term plasticity of locomotor circuits and provide a possible basis for persons learning to achieve more functional gait patterns following a stroke or other neurological disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20186402     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2187-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  55 in total

1.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Modulation of dorsal spinocerebellar responses to limb movement. II. Effect of sensory input.

Authors:  G Bosco; R E Poppele
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS).

Authors:  M Pohl; C Werner; M Holzgraefe; G Kroczek; J Mehrholz; I Wingendorf; G Hoölig; R Koch; S Hesse
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.477

4.  Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking.

Authors:  Susanne M Morton; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Adaptation and generalization in acceleration-dependent force fields.

Authors:  Eun Jung Hwang; Maurice A Smith; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Raymond K Tong; Maple F Ng; Leonard S Li
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Claude Ghez; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Distributed neural networks for controlling human locomotion: lessons from normal and SCI subjects.

Authors:  Y P Ivanenko; R E Poppele; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Feedback of ankle joint angle and soleus electromyography in the rehabilitation of hemiplegic gait.

Authors:  G R Colborne; S J Olney; M P Griffin
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Pharmacologically evoked fictive motor patterns in the acutely spinalized marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  B Fedirchuk; J Nielsen; N Petersen; H Hultborn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  20 in total

1.  Effect of a robotic restraint gait training versus robotic conventional gait training on gait parameters in stroke patients.

Authors:  Céline Bonnyaud; Raphael Zory; Julien Boudarham; Didier Pradon; Djamel Bensmail; Nicolas Roche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Neurorobotic and hybrid management of lower limb motor disorders: a review.

Authors:  Juan C Moreno; Antonio J Del Ama; Ana de Los Reyes-Guzmán; Angel Gil-Agudo; Ramón Ceres; José L Pons
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Musculoskeletal geometry accounts for apparent extrinsic representation of paw position in dorsal spinocerebellar tract.

Authors:  Raeed H Chowdhury; Matthew C Tresch; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Interlimb transfer of motor skill learning during walking: No evidence for asymmetric transfer.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Rajiv Ranganathan; Manik Tetarbe
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Robotic Assist-As-Needed as an Alternative to Therapist-Assisted Gait Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Shraddha Srivastava; Pei Chun Kao; Darcy S Reisman; John P Scholz; Sunil K Agrawal; Jill S Higginson
Journal:  Int J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-12

Review 6.  Technological advances in interventions to enhance poststroke gait.

Authors:  Lynne R Sheffler; John Chae
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.784

7.  Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals.

Authors:  Pei-Chun Kao; Shraddha Srivastava; Sunil K Agrawal; John P Scholz
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Variable Damping Force Tunnel for Gait Training Using ALEX III.

Authors:  Paul Stegall; Damiano Zanotto; Sunil K Agrawal
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2017-02-17

9.  Active robotic training improves locomotor function in a stroke survivor.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Rajiv Ranganathan; Shailesh S Kantak; Yasin Y Dhaher; William Z Rymer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Seven capital devices for the future of stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Iosa; G Morone; A Fusco; M Bragoni; P Coiro; M Multari; V Venturiero; D De Angelis; L Pratesi; S Paolucci
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.