Literature DB >> 28381486

Musculoskeletal geometry accounts for apparent extrinsic representation of paw position in dorsal spinocerebellar tract.

Raeed H Chowdhury1, Matthew C Tresch1,2,3,4, Lee E Miller5,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Proprioception, the sense of limb position and motion, arises from individual muscle receptors. An important question is how and where in the neuroaxis our high level "extrinsic" sense of limb movement originates. In the 1990s, a series of papers detailed the properties of neurons in the dorsal spinocerebellar tract (DSCT) of the cat. Despite their direct projections from sensory receptors, it appeared that half of these neurons had consistent, high-level tuning to paw position rather than to joint angles (or muscle lengths). These results suggested that many DSCT neurons compute paw position from lower level sensory information. We examined the contribution of musculoskeletal geometry to this apparent extrinsic representation by simulating a three-joint hindlimb with mono- and biarticular muscles, each providing a muscle spindlelike signal, modulated by the muscle length. We simulated neurons driven by randomly weighted combinations of these signals and moved the paw to different positions under two joint-covariance conditions similar to the original experiments. Our results paralleled those experiments in a number of respects: 1) Many neurons were tuned to paw position relative to the hip under both conditions. 2) The distribution of tuning was strongly bimodal, with most neurons driven by whole-leg flexion or extension. 3) The change in tuning between conditions clustered around zero (median absolute change ~20°). These results indicate that, at least for these constraint conditions, extrinsic-like representation can be achieved simply through musculoskeletal geometry and convergent muscle length inputs. Consequently, they suggest a reinterpretation of the earlier results may be required.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A classic experiment concluding that many dorsal spinocerebellar tract neurons encode paw position rather than joint angles has been cited by many studies as evidence for high-level computation occurring within a single synapse of the sensors. However, our study provides evidence that such a computation is not required to explain the results. Using simulation, we replicated many of the original results with purely random connectivity, suggesting that a reinterpretation of the classic experiment is needed.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; cat hindlimb; dorsal spinocerebellar tract; proprioception; simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28381486      PMCID: PMC5498728          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00695.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  38 in total

1.  Patterns of fusimotor activity during locomotion in the decerebrate cat deduced from recordings from hindlimb muscle spindles.

Authors:  A Taylor; R Durbaba; P H Ellaway; S Rawlinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Effects of inactivation of the anterior interpositus nucleus on the kinematic and dynamic control of multijoint movement.

Authors:  S E Cooper; J H Martin; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Direct comparison of the task-dependent discharge of M1 in hand space and muscle space.

Authors:  M M Morrow; L R Jordan; L E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking.

Authors:  Susanne M Morton; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Motor cortical prediction of EMG: evidence that a kinetic brain-machine interface may be robust across altered movement dynamics.

Authors:  A Cherian; M O Krucoff; L E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Representation of multiple kinematic parameters of the cat hindlimb in spinocerebellar activity.

Authors:  G Bosco; R E Poppele
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Preference distributions of primary motor cortex neurons reflect control solutions optimized for limb biomechanics.

Authors:  Timothy P Lillicrap; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Do neurons in the motor cortex encode movement direction? An alternative hypothesis.

Authors:  F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1988-08-15       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Instant neural control of a movement signal.

Authors:  Mijail D Serruya; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Liam Paninski; Matthew R Fellows; John P Donoghue
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. I. Spatial errors.

Authors:  J Gordon; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  4 in total

1.  Highlights from the 28th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neural Control of Movement.

Authors:  Kevin A Mazurek; Michael Berger; Tejapratap Bollu; Raeed H Chowdhury; Naveen Elangovan; Irene A Kuling; M Hongchul Sohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Cerebellar compartments for the processing of kinematic and kinetic information related to hindlimb stepping.

Authors:  M S Valle; G Bosco; R E Poppele
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Control of Mammalian Locomotion by Somatosensory Feedback.

Authors:  Alain Frigon; Turgay Akay; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 8.915

4.  Area 2 of primary somatosensory cortex encodes kinematics of the whole arm.

Authors:  Raeed H Chowdhury; Joshua I Glaser; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.