BACKGROUND: Concurrent head-to-head comparisons of healthcare interventions regarding cost-utility are rare. The concept of favorable cost-effectiveness of total hip or knee arthroplasty is thus inadequately verified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a trial involving several thousand patients from 10 medical specialties, 223 patients who were enrolled for hip or knee replacement surgery were asked to fill in the 15D health-related quality of life (HRQoL) survey before and after operation. RESULTS: Mean (SD) HRQoL score (on a 0-1 scale) increased in primary hip replacement patients (n = 96) from 0.81 (0.084) preoperatively to 0.86 (0.12) at 12 months (p < 0.001). In revision hip replacement (n = 24) the corresponding scores were 0.81 (0.086) and 0.82 (0.097) respectively (p = 0.4), and in knee replacement (n = 103) the scores were 0.81 (0.093) and 0.84 (0.11) respectively (p < 0.001). Of 15 health dimensions, there were statistically significant improvements in moving, usual activities, discomfort and symptoms, distress, and vitality in both primary replacement groups. Mean cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained during a 1-year period was euro 6,710 for primary hip replacement, euro 52,274 for revision hip replacement, and euro 13,995 for primary knee replacement. INTERPRETATION: Hip and knee replacement both improve HRQoL. The cost per QALY gained from knee replacement is twice that gained from hip replacement.
BACKGROUND: Concurrent head-to-head comparisons of healthcare interventions regarding cost-utility are rare. The concept of favorable cost-effectiveness of total hip or knee arthroplasty is thus inadequately verified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a trial involving several thousand patients from 10 medical specialties, 223 patients who were enrolled for hip or knee replacement surgery were asked to fill in the 15D health-related quality of life (HRQoL) survey before and after operation. RESULTS: Mean (SD) HRQoL score (on a 0-1 scale) increased in primary hip replacement patients (n = 96) from 0.81 (0.084) preoperatively to 0.86 (0.12) at 12 months (p < 0.001). In revision hip replacement (n = 24) the corresponding scores were 0.81 (0.086) and 0.82 (0.097) respectively (p = 0.4), and in knee replacement (n = 103) the scores were 0.81 (0.093) and 0.84 (0.11) respectively (p < 0.001). Of 15 health dimensions, there were statistically significant improvements in moving, usual activities, discomfort and symptoms, distress, and vitality in both primary replacement groups. Mean cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained during a 1-year period was euro 6,710 for primary hip replacement, euro 52,274 for revision hip replacement, and euro 13,995 for primary knee replacement. INTERPRETATION: Hip and knee replacement both improve HRQoL. The cost per QALY gained from knee replacement is twice that gained from hip replacement.
Authors: Warren R Dunn; Brian R Wolf; Frank E Harrell; Emily K Reinke; Laura J Huston; Kurt P Spindler Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Marcel Widmer; Milka Maravic; Enrique Gómez-Barrena; Maria de Fátima de Pina; Valerio Manno; Marina Torre; William L Walter; Richard de Steiger; Rudolph G T Geesink; Mikko Peltola; Christoph Röder Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Maaike M Vissers; Ingrid B de Groot; Max Reijman; Johannes B Bussmann; Henk J Stam; Jan An Verhaar Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Kevin J Bozic; Christine M Pui; Matthew J Ludeman; Thomas P Vail; Marc D Silverstein Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.176