Literature DB >> 20185339

Histopathologic correlates of myocardial improvement in patients supported by a left ventricular assist device.

Ana Maria Segura1, O H Frazier, Zumrut Demirozu, L Maximilian Buja.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices unload the failing heart and improve hemodynamic function and tissue architecture. In some patients improvement allows for left ventricular assist device removal. We retrospectively compared histologic features in patients who were weaned off left ventricular assist device support with those who remained on support without evidence of clinical remission.
METHODS: We graded left ventricular core samples taken at implantation on a scale we designed for evaluating severity and extent of fibrosis and hypertrophy. We correlated the grades with a computerized semiquantitative analysis of picrosirius-red and Masson's trichrome-stained sections. We evaluated interstitial (10×), perivascular (20×), and replacement (4×) fibrosis. Hypertrophy was assessed by myocyte diameter, cytoplasmic area, and nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio.
RESULTS: All patients (N=17) underwent left ventricular assist device implantation for heart failure. In eight patients improvement allowed left ventricular assist device removal. The groups did not differ in age (24.1 vs. 25 years, P=.4) or mean time on left ventricular assist device support (506 vs. 414 days, P=.24). All mean measures showed significantly less hypertrophy in the left ventricular assist device-removal group than in the nonremoval group, respectively (cytoplasmic area, 58.00 vs. 77.18 μm(2), P=.021; myocyte diameter, 20.32 vs. 25.35 μm, P=.004; nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, 11.04 vs. 8.69, P=.053). Although not statistically significant, the left ventricular assist device-removal group tended toward less overall fibrosis than the nonremoval group (11.57 vs. 13.24, P=.214).
CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular assist device-removal patients had less hypertrophy and fibrosis overall than did nonremoval patients. These findings may help identify patients with a higher probability of left ventricular assist device removal and myocardial recovery.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20185339     DOI: 10.1016/j.carpath.2010.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Pathol        ISSN: 1054-8807            Impact factor:   2.185


  15 in total

1.  Anthracycline treatment and ventricular remodeling in left ventricular assist device patients.

Authors:  Ana Maria Segura; Rajko Radovancevic; Zumrat T Demirozu; O H Frazier; L Maximilian Buja
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-04-01

2.  Heart failure in remission for more than 13 years after removal of a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Ana Maria Segura; Lamia Dris; Edward K Massin; Fred J Clubb; L Maximilian Buja; O H Frazier; Heinrich Taegtmeyer
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-08-01

Review 3.  Hold or fold--proteins in advanced heart failure and myocardial recovery.

Authors:  Claudius Mahr; Rebekah L Gundry
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Myocardial recovery with left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Maya Guglin; Leslie Miller
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-08

Review 5.  Molecular changes occurring during reverse remodelling following left ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Emma J Birks; Robert S George
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  A micro-ribonucleic acid signature associated with recovery from assist device support in 2 groups of patients with severe heart failure.

Authors:  Ravi Ramani; Deborah Vela; Ana Segura; Dennis McNamara; Bonnie Lemster; Vishnupriya Samarendra; Robert Kormos; Yoshiya Toyoda; Christian Bermudez; O H Frazier; Christine S Moravec; John Gorcsan; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Charles F McTiernan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Assessment of myocardial viability and left ventricular function in patients supported by a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Deepak K Gupta; Hicham Skali; Jose Rivero; Patricia Campbell; Leslie Griffin; Colleen Smith; Courtney Foster; Brian Claggett; Robert J Glynn; Gregory Couper; Michael M Givertz; Mandeep R Mehra; Marcelo Di Carli; Scott D Solomon; Marc A Pfeffer
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 8.  Expanding the Scope of Multimodality Imaging in Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Zaid I Almarzooq; Anubodh S Varshney; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Manan Pareek; Garrick C Stewart; Jerry D Estep; Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-18

Review 9.  Fibrosis and heart failure.

Authors:  Ana Maria Segura; O H Frazier; L Maximilian Buja
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Treatment strategies for myocardial recovery in heart failure.

Authors:  Andrew J Lenneman; Emma J Birks
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.