Deepak K Gupta1, Hicham Skali1, Jose Rivero1, Patricia Campbell2, Leslie Griffin1, Colleen Smith1, Courtney Foster3, Brian Claggett1, Robert J Glynn4, Gregory Couper1, Michael M Givertz1, Mandeep R Mehra1, Marcelo Di Carli5, Scott D Solomon1, Marc A Pfeffer6. 1. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: mpfeffer@partners.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronically supported left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients may be candidates for novel therapies aimed at promoting reverse remodeling and myocardial recovery. However, the effect of hemodynamic unloading with a LVAD on myocardial viability and LV function in chronically supported LVAD patients has not been fully characterized. We aimed to develop a non-invasive imaging protocol to serially quantify native cardiac structure, function, and myocardial viability while at reduced LVAD support. METHODS: Clinically stable (n = 18) ambulatory patients (83% men, median age, 61 years) supported by a HeartMate II (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) LVAD (median durations of heart failure 4.6 years and LVAD support 7 months) were evaluated by echocardiography and technetium-99m ((99m)Tc)-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging at baseline and after an interval of 2 to 3 months. Echocardiographic measures of LV size and function, including speckle tracking-derived circumferential strain, were compared between ambulatory and reduced LVAD support at baseline and between baseline and follow-up at reduced LVAD support. The extent of myocardial viability by SPECT was compared between baseline and follow-up at reduced LVAD support. RESULTS: With reduction in LVAD speeds (6,600 rpm; interquartile range: 6,200, 7,400 rpm), LV size increased, LV systolic function remained stable, and filling pressures nominally worsened. After a median 2.1 months, cardiac structure, function, and the extent of viable myocardium, globally and regionally, was unchanged on repeat imaging while at reduced LVAD speed. CONCLUSIONS: In clinically stable chronically supported LVAD patients, intrinsic cardiac structure, function, and myocardial viability did not significantly change over the pre-specified time frame. Echocardiographic circumferential strain and (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT myocardial viability imaging may provide useful non-invasive end points for the assessment of cardiac structure and function, particularly for phase II studies of novel therapies aimed at promoting reverse remodeling and myocardial recovery in LVAD patients.
BACKGROUND: Chronically supported left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients may be candidates for novel therapies aimed at promoting reverse remodeling and myocardial recovery. However, the effect of hemodynamic unloading with a LVAD on myocardial viability and LV function in chronically supported LVADpatients has not been fully characterized. We aimed to develop a non-invasive imaging protocol to serially quantify native cardiac structure, function, and myocardial viability while at reduced LVAD support. METHODS: Clinically stable (n = 18) ambulatory patients (83% men, median age, 61 years) supported by a HeartMate II (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) LVAD (median durations of heart failure 4.6 years and LVAD support 7 months) were evaluated by echocardiography and technetium-99m ((99m)Tc)-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging at baseline and after an interval of 2 to 3 months. Echocardiographic measures of LV size and function, including speckle tracking-derived circumferential strain, were compared between ambulatory and reduced LVAD support at baseline and between baseline and follow-up at reduced LVAD support. The extent of myocardial viability by SPECT was compared between baseline and follow-up at reduced LVAD support. RESULTS: With reduction in LVAD speeds (6,600 rpm; interquartile range: 6,200, 7,400 rpm), LV size increased, LV systolic function remained stable, and filling pressures nominally worsened. After a median 2.1 months, cardiac structure, function, and the extent of viable myocardium, globally and regionally, was unchanged on repeat imaging while at reduced LVAD speed. CONCLUSIONS: In clinically stable chronically supported LVADpatients, intrinsic cardiac structure, function, and myocardial viability did not significantly change over the pre-specified time frame. Echocardiographic circumferential strain and (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT myocardial viability imaging may provide useful non-invasive end points for the assessment of cardiac structure and function, particularly for phase II studies of novel therapies aimed at promoting reverse remodeling and myocardial recovery in LVADpatients.
Authors: E A Rose; A C Gelijns; A J Moskowitz; D F Heitjan; L W Stevenson; W Dembitsky; J W Long; D D Ascheim; A R Tierney; R G Levitan; J T Watson; P Meier; N S Ronan; P A Shapiro; R M Lazar; L W Miller; L Gupta; O H Frazier; P Desvigne-Nickens; M C Oz; V L Poirier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman; Bruce B Reid; John V Terrovitis; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert S George; Emma J Birks; Andrew Cheetham; Carole Webb; Ryszad T Smolenski; Asghar Khaghani; Magdi H Yacoub; Andrew Kelion Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2013-04-21 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Francis D Pagani; Marissa A Miller; J T Baldwin; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Christos P Kyriakopoulos; Chris J Kapelios; Elizabeth L Stauder; Iosif Taleb; Rana Hamouche; Konstantinos Sideris; Antigone G Koliopoulou; Michael J Bonios; Stavros G Drakos Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Zaid I Almarzooq; Anubodh S Varshney; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Manan Pareek; Garrick C Stewart; Jerry D Estep; Mandeep R Mehra Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-09-18
Authors: Louis S Fixsen; Niels J Petterson; Patrick Houthuizen; Marcel C M Rutten; Frans N van de Vosse; Richard G P Lopata Journal: Artif Organs Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 3.094