Literature DB >> 20184443

Temporally variable multivariate sexual selection on sexually dimorphic traits in a wild insect population.

David Punzalan1, F Helen Rodd, Locke Rowe.   

Abstract

A widely held view is that the strength and form of natural selection varies in time and space in response to varying ecological forces; however, adequate quantitative evaluations of this are relatively scarce. In this study, we measured the strength and form of sexual selection acting on a suite of male morphological traits in a wild ambush bug (Phymata americana) population at 10 sampling dates over 2 years. We tested the prediction that the strength and direction of sexual selection would be associated with one or more important ecological variables. We found that patterns of multivariate selection varied considerably over time, and even within a season. Yet, for this population, a sexually dimorphic color pattern trait was consistently a target of directional selection. The strength of sexual selection on this trait was related to both sex ratio and density, which is consistent with the idea that ecological factors can play an important role in generating patterns of sexual selection. We also demonstrate that the median strength of linear selection obtained from replicated cross-sectional methods was qualitatively similar to the estimates obtained from longitudinal methods, providing multiple lines of evidence that the evolution of sexual color dimorphism in this species is attributable to sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20184443     DOI: 10.1086/650719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  12 in total

1.  The influence of maternal effects on indirect benefits associated with polyandry.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; Bronwyn H Bleakley; Craig A Walling; Thomas A R Price; Clare E Stamper; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Differences in the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection among fitness components in the wild.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Joseph D DiBattista; Jeffrey A Evans; Stephanie M Carlson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Defining individual quality over lifetimes and selective contexts.

Authors:  Simon P Lailvaux; Michael M Kasumovic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Host-parasitoid evolution in a metacommunity.

Authors:  Denon Start; Benjamin Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Temporal variation in selection on male and female traits in wild tree crickets.

Authors:  Kyla Ercit
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Concordance between stabilizing sexual selection, intraspecific variation, and interspecific divergence in Phymata.

Authors:  David Punzalan; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  The juvenile social environment introduces variation in the choice and expression of sexually selected traits.

Authors:  Michael M Kasumovic; Matthew D Hall; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Multivariate sexual selection on male song structure in wild populations of sagebrush crickets, Cyphoderris strepitans (Orthoptera: Haglidae).

Authors:  Geoffrey D Ower; Kevin A Judge; Sandra Steiger; Kyle J Caron; Rebecca A Smith; John Hunt; Scott K Sakaluk
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Effect of competitive cues on reproductive morphology and behavioral plasticity in male fruitflies.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; Claudia Fricke; James D Westmancoat; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Black widows as plastic wallflowers: female choosiness increases with indicators of high mate availability in a natural population.

Authors:  Catherine E Scott; Sean McCann; Maydianne C B Andrade
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.