OBJECTIVE: To validate fast perfusion mapping techniques in a setting of coronary artery stenosis, and to further assess the relationship of absolute myocardial blood volume (MBV) and blood flow (MBF) to global myocardial oxygen demand. METHODS: A group of 27 mongrel dogs were divided into 10 controls and 17 with acute coronary stenosis. On 1.5-T MRI, first-pass perfusion imaging with a bolus injection of a blood-pool contrast agent was performed to determine myocardial perfusion both at rest and during either dipyridamole-induced vasodilation or dobutamine-induced stress. Regional values of MBF and MBV were quantified by using a fast mapping technique. Color microspheres and (99m)Tc-labeled red blood cells were injected to obtain respective gold standards. RESULTS: Microsphere-measured MBF and (99m)Tc-measured MBV reference values correlated well with the MR results. Given the same changes in MBF, changes in MBV are twofold greater with dobutamine than with dipyridamole. Under dobutamine stress, MBV shows better association with total myocardial oxygen demand than MBF. Coronary stenosis progressively reduced this association in the presence of increased stenosis severity. CONCLUSIONS: MR first-pass perfusion can rapidly estimate regional MBF and MBV. Absolute quantification of MBV may add additional information on stenosis severity and myocardial viability compared with standard qualitative clinical evaluations of myocardial perfusion.
OBJECTIVE: To validate fast perfusion mapping techniques in a setting of coronary artery stenosis, and to further assess the relationship of absolute myocardial blood volume (MBV) and blood flow (MBF) to global myocardial oxygen demand. METHODS: A group of 27 mongrel dogs were divided into 10 controls and 17 with acute coronary stenosis. On 1.5-T MRI, first-pass perfusion imaging with a bolus injection of a blood-pool contrast agent was performed to determine myocardial perfusion both at rest and during either dipyridamole-induced vasodilation or dobutamine-induced stress. Regional values of MBF and MBV were quantified by using a fast mapping technique. Color microspheres and (99m)Tc-labeled red blood cells were injected to obtain respective gold standards. RESULTS: Microsphere-measured MBF and (99m)Tc-measured MBV reference values correlated well with the MR results. Given the same changes in MBF, changes in MBV are twofold greater with dobutamine than with dipyridamole. Under dobutamine stress, MBV shows better association with total myocardial oxygen demand than MBF. Coronary stenosis progressively reduced this association in the presence of increased stenosis severity. CONCLUSIONS: MR first-pass perfusion can rapidly estimate regional MBF and MBV. Absolute quantification of MBV may add additional information on stenosis severity and myocardial viability compared with standard qualitative clinical evaluations of myocardial perfusion.
Authors: S Möhlenkamp; T R Behrenbeck; A Lerman; L O Lerman; V S Pankratz; P F Sheedy; A L Weaver; E L Ritman Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: D Elizabeth Le; Jian-Ping Bin; Matthew P Coggins; Kevin Wei; Jonathan R Lindner; Sanjiv Kaul Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Timothy F Christian; Dan W Rettmann; Anthony H Aletras; Steve L Liao; Joni L Taylor; Robert S Balaban; Andrew E Arai Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-07-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J Schwitter; D Nanz; S Kneifel; K Bertschinger; M Büchi; P R Knüsel; B Marincek; T F Lüscher; G K von Schulthess Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-05-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jian-Ping Bin; Robert A Pelberg; Kevin Wei; D Elizabeth Le; N Craig Goodman; Sanjiv Kaul Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-07-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jian-Ping Bin; D Elizabeth Le; Ananda R Jayaweera; Matthew P Coggins; Kevin Wei; Sanjiv Kaul Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Rolf Gebker; M Frick; C Jahnke; A Berger; C Schneeweis; R Manka; S Kelle; C Klein; B Schnackenburg; E Fleck; I Paetsch Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Octavia Bane; Daniel C Lee; Brandon C Benefield; Kathleen R Harris; Neil R Chatterjee; James C Carr; Timothy J Carroll Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-12-07 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; Choukri Mekkaoui; Peter Gatehouse; Timothy G Reese; Jennifer Keegan; Pedro F Ferreira; Steve Collins; Peter Speier; Thorsten Feiweier; Ranil de Silva; Marcel P Jackowski; Dudley J Pennell; David E Sosnovik; David Firmin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-09-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Karthigesh Sree Raman; Ranjit Shah; Michael Stokes; Angela Walls; Richard J Woodman; Rajiv Ananthakrishna; Jennifer G Walker; Susanna Proudman; Peter M Steele; Carmine G De Pasquale; David S Celermajer; Joseph B Selvanayagam Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2020-10
Authors: Matthew K Burrage; Mayooran Shanmuganathan; Ambra Masi; Evan Hann; Qiang Zhang; Iulia A Popescu; Rajkumar Soundarajan; Joana Leal Pelado; Kelvin Chow; Stefan Neubauer; Stefan K Piechnik; Vanessa M Ferreira Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 4.164