Literature DB >> 22526183

[Radical prostatectomy - pro robotic].

R Gillitzer1.   

Abstract

Anatomical radical prostatectomy was introduced in the early 1980s by Walsh and Donker. Elucidation of key anatomical structures led to a significant reduction in the morbidity of this procedure. The strive to achieve similar oncological and functional results to this gold standard open procedure but with further reduction of morbidity through a minimally invasive access led to the establishment of laparoscopic prostatectomy. However, this procedure is complex and difficult and is associated with a long learning curve. The technical advantages of robotically assisted surgery coupled with the intuitive handling of the device led to increased precision and shortening of the learning curve. These main advantages, together with a massive internet presence and aggressive marketing, have resulted in a rapid dissemination of robotic radical prostatectomy and an increasing patient demand. However, superiority of robotic radical prostatectomy in comparison to the other surgical therapeutic options has not yet been proven on a scientific basis. Currently robotic-assisted surgery is an established technique and future technical improvements will certainly further define its role in urological surgery. In the end this technical innovation will have to be balanced against the very high purchase and running costs, which remain the main limitation of this technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526183     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-012-2880-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  34 in total

1.  Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; David Woo; Louis Eichel; David I Lee; Robert Edwards; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload.

Authors:  Giovanni B Di Pierro; Philipp Baumeister; Patrick Stucki; Josef Beatrice; Hansjörg Danuser; Agostino Mattei
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients.

Authors:  Francesco Greco; M Raschid Hoda; Sigrid Wagner; Olaf Reichelt; Antonino Inferrera; Carlo Magno; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.

Authors:  François Rozet; Jamison Jaffe; Guillaume Braud; Justin Harmon; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Barret; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The learning curve for reducing complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon.

Authors:  Yen-Chuan Ou; Chi-Rei Yang; John Wang; Chun-Kuang Yang; Chen-Li Cheng; Vipul R Patel; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention.

Authors:  P C Walsh; P J Donker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Intraoperative laparoscopic fluorescence guidance to the sentinel lymph node in prostate cancer patients: clinical proof of concept of an integrated functional imaging approach using a multimodal tracer.

Authors:  Henk G van der Poel; Tessa Buckle; Oscar R Brouwer; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Fijs W B van Leeuwen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Rafael F Coelho; Sanket Chauhan; Kenneth J Palmer; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ignacio Camacho; Geoff Coughlin; Bernardo Rocco
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  [Therapy choices of German urologists and radio-oncologists if personally diagnosed with localized prostate cancer].

Authors:  R Gillitzer; C Hampel; C Thomas; F Schmidt; S W Melchior; S Pahernik; H Schmidberger; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Sanket Chauhan; Kenneth J Palmer; Bernardo Rocco; Manoj B Patel; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.