PURPOSE: It is considered that establishing accredited specialized centers can serve as a marketing tool. This study investigated whether accredited specialized centers influence patients' choice of hospital. METHODS: A total of 2,389 patients was included in a questionnaire survey: 468 at the Department of Gynecology, 745 at the certified University Breast Center of Franconia, 1,000 at the University Perinatal Center of Franconia and 176 for whom classification details were lacking. RESULTS: Among the oncological patients, physicians in private practice played an important role in the choice of hospital (58.4 vs. 25.7%; P < 0.001; OR 4.058). Among obstetric patients, the primary factors were recommendations from family [odds ratio (OR) 0.495], friends (OR 0.218), and previous personal experience of the hospital (OR 0.695). For oncological patients, treatment quality (OR 2.693), availability of a center (OR 1.785), and certification (OR 3.939) were comparatively more important. For obstetric patients, friendliness (OR 0.409) and attractive accommodation (OR 0.153) were more important. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians are the most important source of recommendations for oncological patients. From the marketing point of view, intensive involvement of local private-practice physicians is necessary. The availability of certified perinatal centers does not currently play any part in patients' choice of hospital.
PURPOSE: It is considered that establishing accredited specialized centers can serve as a marketing tool. This study investigated whether accredited specialized centers influence patients' choice of hospital. METHODS: A total of 2,389 patients was included in a questionnaire survey: 468 at the Department of Gynecology, 745 at the certified University Breast Center of Franconia, 1,000 at the University Perinatal Center of Franconia and 176 for whom classification details were lacking. RESULTS: Among the oncological patients, physicians in private practice played an important role in the choice of hospital (58.4 vs. 25.7%; P < 0.001; OR 4.058). Among obstetricpatients, the primary factors were recommendations from family [odds ratio (OR) 0.495], friends (OR 0.218), and previous personal experience of the hospital (OR 0.695). For oncological patients, treatment quality (OR 2.693), availability of a center (OR 1.785), and certification (OR 3.939) were comparatively more important. For obstetricpatients, friendliness (OR 0.409) and attractive accommodation (OR 0.153) were more important. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians are the most important source of recommendations for oncological patients. From the marketing point of view, intensive involvement of local private-practice physicians is necessary. The availability of certified perinatal centers does not currently play any part in patients' choice of hospital.
Authors: M P Lux; P A Fasching; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; M G Schrauder; M R Bani; F C Thiel; C C Hack; T Hildebrandt; M W Beckmann Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Michael Lux; Thomas Hildebrandt; Elke Beyer-Finkler; Mayada Bani; Christian Loehberg; Sebastian Jud; Claudia Rauh; Michael Schrauder; Peter Fasching; Matthias Beckmann Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: S Baum; G Meyberg-Solomayer; A Baum; J Radosa; A Hamza; B Gronwald; M Friedrich; E F Solomayer; R Joukhadar Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: T Hildebrandt; F Kraml; S Wagner; C C Hack; F C Thiel; S Kehl; M Winkler; W Frobenius; F Faschingbauer; M W Beckmann; M P Lux Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Stef Groenewoud; N Job A Van Exel; Ana Bobinac; Marc Berg; Robbert Huijsman; Elly A Stolk Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 3.402