Literature DB >> 24771932

Impact of Patient and Procedure Mix on Finances of Perinatal Centres - Theoretical Models for Economic Strategies in Perinatal Centres.

T Hildebrandt1, F Kraml1, S Wagner1, C C Hack1, F C Thiel1, S Kehl1, M Winkler1, W Frobenius1, F Faschingbauer1, M W Beckmann1, M P Lux1.   

Abstract

Introduction: In Germany, cost and revenue structures of hospitals with defined treatment priorities are currently being discussed to identify uneconomic services. This discussion has also affected perinatal centres (PNCs) and represents a new economic challenge for PNCs. In addition to optimising the time spent in hospital, the hospital management needs to define the "best" patient mix based on costs and revenues. Method: Different theoretical models were proposed based on the cost and revenue structures of the University Perinatal Centre for Franconia (UPF). Multi-step marginal costing was then used to show the impact on operating profits of changes in services and bed occupancy rates. The current contribution margin accounting used by the UPF served as the basis for the calculations. The models demonstrated the impact of changes in services on costs and revenues of a level 1 PNC.
Results: Contribution margin analysis was used to calculate profitable and unprofitable DRGs based on average inpatient cost per day. Nineteen theoretical models were created. The current direct costing used by the UPF and a theoretical model with a 100 % bed occupancy rate were used as reference models. Significantly higher operating profits could be achieved by doubling the number of profitable DRGs and halving the number of less profitable DRGs. Operating profits could be increased even more by changing the rates of profitable DRGs per bed occupancy. The exclusive specialisation on pathological and high-risk pregnancies resulted in operating losses. All models which increased the numbers of caesarean sections or focused exclusively on c-sections resulted in operating losses.
Conclusion: These theoretical models offer a basis for economic planning. They illustrate the enormous impact potential changes can have on the operating profits of PNCs. Level 1 PNCs require high bed occupancy rates and a profitable patient mix to cover the extremely high costs incurred due to the services they are legally required to offer. Based on our theoretical models it must be stated that spontaneous vaginal births (not caesarean sections) were the most profitable procedures in the current DRG system. Overall, it currently makes economic sense for level I PNCs to treat as many low-risk pregnancies and neonates as possible to cover costs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DRG system; costs; financing; perinatal centres; rate of caesarean sections

Year:  2013        PMID: 24771932      PMCID: PMC3858996          DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  13 in total

1.  [Costs and revenues for a birth in Germany].

Authors:  T Schwenzer; C Schwenzer
Journal:  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 0.685

2.  [Refinancing obstetrics].

Authors:  S Schmidt
Journal:  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 0.685

3.  [Structure and reimbursement in obstetrics - are births in level I perinatal centres economically sound?].

Authors:  B Seelbach-Göbel
Journal:  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 0.685

Review 4.  Health Services Research and Health Economy - Quality Care Training in Gynaecology, with Focus On Gynaecological Oncology.

Authors:  M P Lux; P A Fasching; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; M G Schrauder; M R Bani; F C Thiel; C C Hack; T Hildebrandt; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Cesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Ecker; Fredric D Frigoletto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Neonatal Transfer Rate and Mode of Delivery from 37th Week of Gestation in a German Perinatal Center Level 1.

Authors:  J Reinhard; L Hanker; N Sänger; J Yuan; F Louwen
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Prenatal Clinical Assessment of sFlt-1 (Soluble fms-like Tyrosine Kinase-1)/PlGF (Placental Growth Factor) Ratio as a Diagnostic Tool for Preeclampsia, Pregnancy-induced Hypertension, and Proteinuria.

Authors:  H Lehnen; N Mosblech; T Reineke; A Puchooa; I Menke-Möllers; U Zechner; U Gembruch
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Financial viability of perinatal centers in the longer term, taking legislative requirements into account. An examination of the cost-revenue structure of a Level I perinatal center.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Florian Kraml; Stefanie Wagner; Carolin C Hack; Christine Schulze; Florian Faschingbauer; Mathias Winkler; Peter A Fasching; Matthias W Beckmann; Thomas Hildebrandt
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Vahé A Kazandjian; C Patrick Chaulk; Sam Ogunbo; Karol Wicker
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Hospital treatment - Is it affordable? A structured cost analysis of vaginal deliveries and planned caesarean sections.

Authors:  I M Heer; S Kahlert; S Rummel; C Kümper; W Jonat; A Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.175

View more
  1 in total

1.  Is Early Treatment with a Cervical Pessary an Option in Patients with a History of Surgical Conisation and a Short Cervix?

Authors:  I Kyvernitakis; R Khatib; N Stricker; B Arabin
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.915

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.