Literature DB >> 20179690

Esophageal motor disorders in terms of high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: what has changed?

Peter J Kahrilas1.   

Abstract

The concept of high-resolution manometry (HRM) is to use sufficient pressure sensors such that intraluminal pressure can be monitored as a continuum along luminal length much as time is viewed as a continuum in conventional manometry. When HRM is coupled with pressure topography plots, pressure amplitude is transformed into spectral colors with isobaric conditions indicated by same-colored regions on the display. Together, these technologies are called high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT). HREPT has several advantages compared with conventional manometry, the technology that it was designed to replace. (i) The contractility of the entire esophagus can be viewed simultaneously in a uniform format, (ii) standardized objective metrics can be systematically applied for interpretation, and (iii) topographic patterns of contractility are more easily recognized and have greater reproducibility than with conventional manometry. Compared with conventional manometry, HREPT has improved sensitivity for detecting achalasia, largely due to the objectivity and accuracy with which it identifies impaired esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation. In addition, it has led to the subcategorization of achalasia into three clinically relevant subtypes based on the contractile function of the esophageal body: classic achalasia, achalasia with esophageal compression, and spastic achalasia. Headway has also been made in understanding hypercontractile conditions, including diffuse esophageal spasm and a newly described entity, spastic nutcracker. Ultimately, clinical experience will be the judge, but it seems likely that HREPT data, along with its well-defined functional implications, will improve the clinical management of esophageal motility disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20179690      PMCID: PMC2888528          DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  15 in total

1.  Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano; A Alrakawi; L Haroian
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; Qing Zhang; Andrew Jarosz; Nimeesh Shah; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sudip K Ghosh; Qing Zhang; Andrew Jarosz; Nimeesh Shah; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Utilizing intraluminal pressure differences to predict esophageal bolus flow dynamics.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas; Nilesh Lodhia; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-10

6.  Diffuse esophageal spasm: a reappraisal.

Authors:  J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sudip K Ghosh; John Rice; John O Clarke; Monika A Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; John Rice; John O Clarke; Monika Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 4.052

10.  Unique features of esophagogastric junction pressure topography in hiatus hernia patients with dysphagia.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Monika A Kwiatek; Kim Ho; John R Scherer; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  30 in total

1.  Interobserver variability in esophageal body measurements with high-resolution manometry among new physician users.

Authors:  Erick Raj Singh; Christopher Rife; Steven Clayton; Peter Naas; Paul Nietert; Donald O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 2.  Current status in the treatment options for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Seng-Kee Chuah; Chien-Hua Chiu; Wei-Chen Tai; Jyong-Hong Lee; Hung-I Lu; Chi-Sin Changchien; Ping-Huei Tseng; Keng-Liang Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Manometric features of eosinophilic esophagitis in esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  S Roman; I Hirano; M A Kwiatek; N Gonsalves; J Chen; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Impact of thoracic surgery on esophageal motor function-Evaluation by high resolution manometry.

Authors:  Anja Wäsche; Arne Kandulski; Peter Malfertheiner; Sandra Riedel; Patrick Zardo; Thomas Hachenberg; Jens Schreiber
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  High-resolution manometry and esophageal pressure topography: filling the gaps of convention manometry.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 6.  Surgical treatment for achalasia: when should it be performed, and for which patients?

Authors:  Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Nobuo Omura
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-06-15

Review 7.  The Chicago criteria for esophageal motility disorders: what has changed in the past 5 years?

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.287

8.  Use of Clostridium botulinum toxin in gastrointestinal motility disorders in children.

Authors:  Ricardo A Arbizu; Leonel Rodriguez
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-16

Review 9.  Oesophageal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Taher Omari
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  The relationship between dysphagia, pump function, and lower esophageal sphincter pressures on high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Masato Hoshino; Abhishek Sundaram; Ananth Srinivasan; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.