Literature DB >> 19744454

Unique features of esophagogastric junction pressure topography in hiatus hernia patients with dysphagia.

John E Pandolfino1, Monika A Kwiatek, Kim Ho, John R Scherer, Peter J Kahrilas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to assess pressure dynamics within the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) in sliding hiatus hernia (HH) during normal peristalsis and to compare the pressure profiles of HH patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (HH-GERD) to HH patients with dysphagia (HH-dysphagia).
METHODS: High-resolution manometry studies in 230 consecutive patients and 68 controls were reviewed. HH patients were defined by a >or=1.5 cm separation between the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm (CD) on pressure topography plots. The HH population was further culled to eliminate those patients with motor disorders or stricture. The study groups were composed of 18 HH patients with only reflux symptoms and 10 HH patients with only dysphagia. Analysis of the pressure dynamics within the EGJ was performed at rest and after swallowing to independently quantify the LES and CD contributions to residual EGJ pressure, as well as the magnitude and genesis of distal esophageal intrabolus pressure (IBP). Differences among study groups were analyzed with analysis of variance.
RESULTS: After swallows, HH-dysphagia patients had greater residual CD pressure (9 mmHg; standard deviation [SD], 4) and IBP pressure (19 mmHg; SD, 4) compared to HH-GERD patients (5 mmHg; SD, 2; and 12 mmHg; SD, 2, respectively; P<.001) or normal subjects (NA; 11 mmHg; SD, 3; P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Sliding HH alters the pressure dynamics through the EGJ and can lead to a functional obstruction. Patients with HH and dysphagia have greater pressures through the CD compared to HH patients with GERD symptoms, supporting the hypothesis that sliding HH in and of itself may be responsible for dysphagia. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19744454      PMCID: PMC2891431          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  12 in total

1.  Utilizing intraluminal pressure differences to predict esophageal bolus flow dynamics.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas; Nilesh Lodhia; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 2.  The esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  R K Mittal; D H Balaban
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The phrenic ampulla: distal esophagus or potential hiatal hernia?

Authors:  S Lin; J G Brasseur; P Pouderoux; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1995-02

4.  Esophagogastric junction opening during relaxation distinguishes nonhernia reflux patients, hernia patients, and normal subjects.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Guoxiang Shi; Brian Trueworthy; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Obesity: a challenge to esophagogastric junction integrity.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Hashem B El-Serag; Qing Zhang; Nimeesh Shah; Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  The cause of dysphagia in uncomplicated sliding hiatal hernia and its relief by hiatal herniorrhaphy. A roentgenographic, manometric, and clinical study.

Authors:  B K Kaul; T R DeMeester; M Oka; C S Ball; H J Stein; C B Kim; S C Cheng
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sudip K Ghosh; John Rice; John O Clarke; Monika A Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; John Rice; John O Clarke; Monika Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 4.052

9.  Attenuation of esophageal shortening during peristalsis with hiatus hernia.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; S Wu; S Lin; P Pouderoux
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  The role of hiatus hernia in GERD.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Jun
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Has high-resolution manometry changed the approach to esophageal motility disorders?

Authors:  Ajay Bansal; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.287

Review 2.  Esophageal motor disorders in terms of high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: what has changed?

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Elevated intrabolus pressure identifies obstructive processes when integrated relaxation pressure is normal on esophageal high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Farhan Quader; Chanakyaram Reddy; Amit Patel; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 4.  Hiatus Hernia as a Cause of Dysphagia.

Authors:  Hamish Philpott; Rami Sweis
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-08

Review 5.  Achalasia: It Is Not All Black and White.

Authors:  Santosh Sanagapalli; Rami Sweis
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-06

Review 6.  High-resolution manometry and esophageal pressure topography: filling the gaps of convention manometry.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 7.  The Chicago criteria for esophageal motility disorders: what has changed in the past 5 years?

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.287

Review 8.  Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; M Fox; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino; W Schwizer; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 9.  Oesophageal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Taher Omari
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 10.  Challenges in the swallowing mechanism: nonobstructive dysphagia in the era of high-resolution manometry and impedance.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.