| Literature DB >> 20178585 |
Sergey V Tokalov1, Nasreddin D Abolmaali.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mutations within the tumor suppressor TP53 gene are one of the most common genetic alterations present at high frequency in human tumors and have been shown to be associated with resistance to radio-chemotherapy. The lack of the wild type TP53 gene in cancer cells could be exploited for therapeutic advantage using a sequence of two antagonistic drugs. The aim of this study was to selectively kill p53 deficient cells (FaDu and H1299) by taxol and to protect p53 wild type cells (A549) by the prior administration of nutlin-3 in comparison to certain known anticancer drugs (5-fluorouracil, camptothecin, roscovitine).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20178585 PMCID: PMC2841137 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-57
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Effects of test substances on proliferation of certain cancer cells.
| 5-fluorouracil (μM) | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 ± 1 | 62 ± 2 | 27 ± 1 | 11 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 51 ± 3 | 31 ± 2 | 16 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 56 ± 2 | 31 ± 2 | 15 ± 1 |
| 3 | 2 ± 1 | 57 ± 2 | 10 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 19 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 14 ± 1 | |||||
| 10 | 2 ± 1 | 8 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 | 20 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 16 ± 2 | ||||||
| 30 | 3 ± 1 | 7 ± 2 | 3 ± 1 | 48 ± 2 | 18 ± 1 | 5 ± 1 | 17 ± 2 | |||||
| Camptothecin (nM) | ||||||||||||
| 10 | 2 ± 1 | 24 ± 2 | 6 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 | ||||||||
| 30 | 16 ± 4 | 17 ± 3 | 19 ± 2 | |||||||||
| 100 | 17 ± 2 | |||||||||||
| 300 | 10 ± 2 | |||||||||||
| Nutlin-3 (μM) | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 ± 1 | 61 ± 2 | 28 ± 2 | 11 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 40 ± 4 | 38 ± 3 | 22 ± 3 | 2 ± 2 | 57 ± 1 | 29 ± 2 | 14 ± 1 |
| 3 | 2 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 44 ± 2 | 34 ± 2 | 22 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 | 57 ± 3 | 25 ± 2 | 18 ± 2 | |||
| 10 | 2 ± 1 | 4 ± 1 | 45 ± 3 | 34 ± 2 | 21 ± 2 | 4 ± 1 | 54 ± 4 | 27 ± 4 | 19 ± 2 | |||
| 30 | 20 ± 2 | 63 ± 2 | 18 ± 1 | |||||||||
| Roscovitine (μM) | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 ± 1 | 60 ± 2 | 24 ± 2 | 16 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 41 ± 4 | 39 ± 4 | 20 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 | 17 ± 2 | ||
| 3 | 2 ± 1 | 59 ± 4 | 20 ± 3 | 2 ± 1 | 43 ± 1 | 32 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 15 ± 2 | ||||
| 10 | 5 ± 1 | 59 ± 4 | 20 ± 3 | 4 ± 1 | 4 ± 2 | 29 ± 1 | ||||||
| 30 | 24 ± 3 | 30 ± 2 | 26 ± 2 | |||||||||
| Taxol (nM) | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 60 ± 4 | 25 ± 4 | 15 ± 2 | 21 ± 2 | 39 ± 3 | 34 ± 6 | 27 ± 4 | 48 ± 6 | 30 ± 3 | 22 ± 5 | ||
| 3 | 32 ± 5 | 35 ± 5 | ||||||||||
| 10 | 29 ± 3 | |||||||||||
| 30 | ||||||||||||
| 100 | 23 ± 3 | |||||||||||
| Control | ||||||||||||
| - 3 | 2 ± 1 | 62 ± 1 | 26 ± 1 | 12 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 46 ± 2 | 36 ± 1 | 18 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 59 ± 2 | 26 ± 2 | 15 ± 1 |
The data show the effects of the test substances on the cell cycle of A549, FaDu and H1299 cells after exposure for 1 day (average ± SD of 6 independent experiments). Significant differences (p < 0.05) to control cultures are indicated in bold print.
1The distribution of cells in different cell cycle phases was calculated from the population of cycling cells (G0 + 1 + S + G2 + M = 100%).
2The percentage of hypodiploid cells (<2C DNA content) was calculated from the total number of cells.
3Since the test compounds were dissolved in a DMSO stock solution, control cells cultures were made in 14 mM (0.1%) DMSO.
Figure 1The effect of certain compounds on cell cycle distribution. Cell cycle distribution in 24 hours after administration of DMSO (0.1%, control), 5-fluorouracil (5FU, 3 μM), camptothecin (Cam, 10 nM), roscovitine (Ros, 10 μM), nutlin-3 (Nut, 3 μM) and taxol (Tax, 10 nM).
Figure 2Cell cycle distribution in 24 hours after combined treatment. Cell cycle distribution in 24 hours after administration of DMSO (0.1%, Control), 5-fluorouracil (5FU, 3 μM), camptothecin (Cam, 10 nM), roscovitine (Ros, 10 μM), nutlin-3 (Nut, 3 μM), followed by administration of taxol (Tax, 10 nM) for another 24 hours.