PURPOSE: The authors assessed the reproducibility of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) volumetry of the total and emphysematous parenchyma of pulmonary lobes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two observers analyzed 23 MDCT examinations of patients with emphysema during two sessions held 3 months apart. Both lungs and all lobes were delimited by a combination of semiautomated and manual segmentation. Emphysematous parenchyma was obtained by applying density thresholds of -1,024/-950 HU. To assess the reproducibility of total volume (V), volume of emphysema (VE) and emphysema index (EI), intra- and interobserver differences of those measurements were assessed. RESULTS: Total volumetry of the lungs was highly reproducible (intra- and interobserver variability of +/-3.4%). Variability between measurements was slightly greater or emphysema volume and index (EI). Lobar analyses showed large ranges of intra- and interobserver variability (intraobserver V=+/-3.7%-10.6%; VE=+/-17.3%-32.9%; EI=+/-17.8%-34%; interobserver V=+/-13.3%-98.3%; VE=+/-11%-137.6%; EI=+/-28.9%-96.4%). CONCLUSIONS: MDCT quantification of total and emphysematous lung volume and emphysema index is overall reproducible. Quantitative assessment of those parameters performed on single lobes is affected by variability. An improvement of the reproducibility of q-MDCT is expected from the use of advanced methods for lobar segmentation.
PURPOSE: The authors assessed the reproducibility of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) volumetry of the total and emphysematous parenchyma of pulmonary lobes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two observers analyzed 23 MDCT examinations of patients with emphysema during two sessions held 3 months apart. Both lungs and all lobes were delimited by a combination of semiautomated and manual segmentation. Emphysematous parenchyma was obtained by applying density thresholds of -1,024/-950 HU. To assess the reproducibility of total volume (V), volume of emphysema (VE) and emphysema index (EI), intra- and interobserver differences of those measurements were assessed. RESULTS: Total volumetry of the lungs was highly reproducible (intra- and interobserver variability of +/-3.4%). Variability between measurements was slightly greater or emphysema volume and index (EI). Lobar analyses showed large ranges of intra- and interobserver variability (intraobserver V=+/-3.7%-10.6%; VE=+/-17.3%-32.9%; EI=+/-17.8%-34%; interobserver V=+/-13.3%-98.3%; VE=+/-11%-137.6%; EI=+/-28.9%-96.4%). CONCLUSIONS: MDCT quantification of total and emphysematous lung volume and emphysema index is overall reproducible. Quantitative assessment of those parameters performed on single lobes is affected by variability. An improvement of the reproducibility of q-MDCT is expected from the use of advanced methods for lobar segmentation.
Authors: M Els Bakker; Jan Stolk; Hein Putter; Saher B Shaker; David G Parr; Eeva Piitulainen; Erich W Russi; Asger Dirksen; Robert A Stockley; Johan H C Reiber; Berend C Stoel Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: F Fraioli; F A Calabrese; F Venuta; M Anile; L Bertoletti; I Carbone; C Catalano; R Passariello Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2006-08-11 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: J Stolk; A Dirksen; A A van der Lugt; J Hutsebaut; J Mathieu; J de Ree; J H Reiber; B C Stoel Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Charlie Strange; Felix J F Herth; Kevin L Kovitz; Geoffrey McLennan; Armin Ernst; Jonathan Goldin; Marc Noppen; Gerard J Criner; Frank C Sciurba Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2007-07-03 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Stefan F Nemec; Francesco Molinari; Valerie Dufresne; Natacha Gosset; Mario Silva; Alexander A Bankier Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-01-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Matheus Alvarez; Diana R Pina; Marcela de Oliveira; Sérgio M Ribeiro; Rinaldo P Mendes; Sérgio B Duarte; José R A Miranda Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: G B Camilo; A R S Carvalho; D C Machado; R Mogami; L Kasuki; M R Gadelha; P L Melo; A J Lopes Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 2.590
Authors: Hyun-ju Lim; Oliver Weinheimer; Mark O Wielpütz; Julien Dinkel; Thomas Hielscher; Daniela Gompelmann; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Claus Peter Heussel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 3.240