| Literature DB >> 26445330 |
G B Camilo1, A R S Carvalho2, D C Machado1, R Mogami1, L Kasuki3, M R Gadelha3, P L Melo1, A J Lopes1.
Abstract
The aims of this study were to evaluate the forced oscillation technique (FOT) and pulmonary densitovolumetry in acromegalic patients and to examine the correlations between these findings. In this cross-sectional study, 29 non-smoking acromegalic patients and 17 paired controls were subjected to the FOT and quantification of lung volume using multidetector computed tomography (Q-MDCT). Compared with the controls, the acromegalic patients had a higher value for resonance frequency [15.3 (10.9-19.7) vs 11.4 (9.05-17.6) Hz, P=0.023] and a lower value for mean reactance [0.32 (0.21-0.64) vs 0.49 (0.34-0.96) cm H2O/L/s2, P=0.005]. In inspiratory Q-MDCT, the acromegalic patients had higher percentages of total lung volume (TLV) for nonaerated and poorly aerated areas [0.42% (0.30-0.51%) vs 0.25% (0.20-0.32%), P=0.039 and 3.25% (2.48-3.46%) vs 1.70% (1.45-2.15%), P=0.001, respectively]. Furthermore, the acromegalic patients had higher values for total lung mass in both inspiratory and expiratory Q-MDCT [821 (635-923) vs 696 (599-769) g, P=0.021 and 844 (650-945) vs 637 (536-736) g, P=0.009, respectively]. In inspiratory Q-MDCT, TLV showed significant correlations with all FOT parameters. The TLV of hyperaerated areas showed significant correlations with intercept resistance (rs=-0.602, P<0.001) and mean resistance (rs=-0.580, P<0.001). These data showed that acromegalic patients have increased amounts of lung tissue as well as nonaerated and poorly aerated areas. Functionally, there was a loss of homogeneity of the respiratory system. Moreover, there were correlations between the structural and functional findings of the respiratory system, consistent with the pathophysiology of the disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26445330 PMCID: PMC4617113 DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20154786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res ISSN: 0100-879X Impact factor: 2.590
Figure 1A, Correlation between the volume of hyperaerated areas (Hyper) and the intercept resistance (R0; rs=−0.602, P<0.001). B, Standardized residuals versus predicted values for the correlation shown in panel A.
Figure 4A, Correlation between the total lung volume (TLV) and the resonance frequency (Fr; rs=−0.669, P<0.001). B, Standardized residuals versus predicted values for the correlation shown in panel A.
Figure 3A, Correlation between the volume of hyperaerated areas (Hyper) and the resistance curve angular coefficient (S; rs=0.520, P<0.005). B, Standardized residuals versus predicted values for the correlation shown in panel A.