Literature DB >> 20177688

The benefit of an enhanced recovery programme following elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy.

Hasan Al Chalabi1, Dara O Kavanagh, Lana Hassan, Kate O Donnell, Emmeline Nugent, Emmet Andrews, Frank B V Keane, Diarmuid S O'Riordain, Andrew Miller, Paul Neary.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) have demonstrated reduced morbidity and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing open elective colorectal resections. The application of laparoscopic techniques to colorectal surgery is associated with shorter length of stay and morbidity compared to open resections. In the setting of laparoscopic surgery, it is unclear whether there is an additive effect on length of stay and morbidity by combining these. The current study addresses the benefit of an ERP (RAPID protocol) in a cohort of matched patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients over a 40-month period who underwent laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection were assigned either to the RAPID protocol (group 1) or traditional post operative care (group 2) in a non-randomised manner. Analysis was on an "intention to treat" basis. Primary and secondary endpoints were identified; primary endpoints included length of hospital stay and readmission rate. Secondary endpoints included morbidity and mortality rate.
RESULTS: Seventy-three consecutive patients were included. Group 1 included 37 patients. Group 2 included 36 patients. Median length of hospital stay in groups 1 and 2 was 5 and 8 days, respectively (p = 0.01). Readmission rate in groups 1 and 2 was 8.1% and 8.3%, respectively (p = 0.98). Morbidity rate in groups 1 and 2 was 30% and 22%, respectively (p = 0.61); there was one mortality in each group.
CONCLUSION: The application of the ERP (RAPID) to patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection results in a significant improvement in length of hospital stay, with comparable morbidity and readmission rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20177688     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-0902-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  24 in total

1.  Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care.

Authors:  Linda Basse; Jens Erik Thorbøl; Kristine Løssl; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Abraham; J M Young; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Laparoscopically assisted colectomy is as safe and effective as open colectomy in people with colon cancer Abstracted from: Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand HS, et al; for the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2050-2059.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery.

Authors:  J Andersen; D Hjort-Jakobsen; P S Christiansen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  J Maessen; C H C Dejong; J Hausel; J Nygren; K Lassen; J Andersen; A G H Kessels; A Revhaug; H Kehlet; O Ljungqvist; K C H Fearon; M F von Meyenfeldt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  An enhanced-recovery protocol improves outcome after colorectal resection already during the first year: a single-center experience in 168 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Jonas Nygren; Mattias Soop; Anders Thorell; Jonatan Hausel; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

9.  Laparoscopic colonic resection in inflammatory bowel disease: minimal surgery, minimal access and minimal hospital stay.

Authors:  E Boyle; P F Ridgway; F B Keane; P Neary
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Gastrointestinal tract recovery in patients undergoing bowel resection: results of a randomized trial of alvimopan and placebo with a standardized accelerated postoperative care pathway.

Authors:  Kirk Ludwig; Warren E Enker; Conor P Delaney; Bruce G Wolff; Wei Du; John G Fort; Maryann Cherubini; James Cucinotta; Lee Techner
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-11
View more
  8 in total

1.  Reducing preoperative fasting in elective adult surgical patients: a case-control study.

Authors:  S Power; D O Kavanagh; G McConnell; K Cronin; C Corish; M Leonard; A Crean; S Feehan; E Eguare; P Neary; J Connolly
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Enhanced recovery strategies in colorectal surgery: is the compliance with the whole program required to achieve the target?

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Simone Beretta; Margherita Luperto; Davide Bernasconi; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Marco Braga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancer: evaluation of oncological efficacy.

Authors:  Diarmaid C Moran; Dara O Kavanagh; Emmeline Nugent; Niall Swan; Emmanuel Eguare; Diarmuid O'Riordain; Frank B V Keane; Paul C Neary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement.

Authors:  Vijaya Gottumukkala; Thomas A Aloia; Ryan W Day; Sharon Fielder; John Calhoun; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Fast-track surgery versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Hua Zhao; Jing-Xu Sun; Peng Gao; Xiao-Wan Chen; Yong-Xi Song; Xuan-Zhang Huang; Hui-Mian Xu; Zhen-Ning Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme.

Authors:  W R Spanjersberg; J D P van Sambeeck; A Bremers; C Rosman; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A meta-analysis of short-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery on colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Guojun Tong; Guiyang Zhang; Jian Liu; Zhengzhao Zheng; Yan Chen; Enhai Cui
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Standardizing the Protocols for Enhanced Recovery From Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Are We a Step Closer to Ideal Recovery?

Authors:  Mosab Shetiwy; Tamer Fady; Fayez Shahatto; Ahmed Setit
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2017-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.