OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is technically demanding but can offer improved short-term outcomes. The introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) as the default operative approach for IBD, however, may have inherent learning curve-associated disadvantages. We hypothesise that the establishment of MIS as the standard operative approach does not increase patient morbidity as assessed in the initial period of its introduction into a specialised unit, and that it confers earlier postoperative gastrointestinal recovery and reduced hospitalisation compared with conventional open resection. METHOD: A case-control study was undertaken on laparoscopic resection (LR) vs open colon resection (OR) for IBD. The LR group was collated prospectively and compared with a pathologically matched historical control set. Outcomes measured included: postoperative length of stay, time to normal bowel function and postoperative morbidity. Statistical analysis was performed using spss. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were investigated (14 LR, 14 OR). The two groups were matched for type of operation, type of disease and age. There were no conversions in the LR group. Morbidity and readmissions did not differ significantly between the groups. Those undergoing laparoscopic resection had a quicker return to diet (median 2 vs 4 days; P = 0.000002), time to first bowel motion (2 vs 4 days; P = 0.019) and shorter postoperative length of stay (5.5 vs 12.5; P = 0.0067). CONCLUSION: These findings support the routine use of MIS for the elective surgical management of IBD in our department. Patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomies for IBD can expect faster return of gastrointestinal function and shorter hospitalisation.
OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is technically demanding but can offer improved short-term outcomes. The introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) as the default operative approach for IBD, however, may have inherent learning curve-associated disadvantages. We hypothesise that the establishment of MIS as the standard operative approach does not increase patient morbidity as assessed in the initial period of its introduction into a specialised unit, and that it confers earlier postoperative gastrointestinal recovery and reduced hospitalisation compared with conventional open resection. METHOD: A case-control study was undertaken on laparoscopic resection (LR) vs open colon resection (OR) for IBD. The LR group was collated prospectively and compared with a pathologically matched historical control set. Outcomes measured included: postoperative length of stay, time to normal bowel function and postoperative morbidity. Statistical analysis was performed using spss. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were investigated (14 LR, 14 OR). The two groups were matched for type of operation, type of disease and age. There were no conversions in the LR group. Morbidity and readmissions did not differ significantly between the groups. Those undergoing laparoscopic resection had a quicker return to diet (median 2 vs 4 days; P = 0.000002), time to first bowel motion (2 vs 4 days; P = 0.019) and shorter postoperative length of stay (5.5 vs 12.5; P = 0.0067). CONCLUSION: These findings support the routine use of MIS for the elective surgical management of IBD in our department. Patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomies for IBD can expect faster return of gastrointestinal function and shorter hospitalisation.
Authors: Dara O Kavanagh; David Gibson; Diarmaid C Moran; Myles Smith; Kate O Donnell; Emmanuel Eguare; Frank B V Keane; Diarmaid S O Riordain; Paul C Neary Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2010-10-23 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Hasan Al Chalabi; Dara O Kavanagh; Lana Hassan; Kate O Donnell; Emmeline Nugent; Emmet Andrews; Frank B V Keane; Diarmuid S O'Riordain; Andrew Miller; Paul Neary Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Nikiforos Ballian; Natalie Weisensel; Victoria Rajamanickam; Eugene F Foley; Charles P Heise; Bruce A Harms; Gregory D Kennedy Journal: World J Surg Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Dana A Telem; Anthony J Vine; Garry Swain; Celia M Divino; Barry Salky; Adrian J Greenstein; Michael Harris; L Brian Katz Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-03-05 Impact factor: 4.584