Literature DB >> 20177284

Robotically assisted hysterectomy in patients with large uteri: outcomes in five community practices.

Thomas N Payne1, Francis R Dauterive, Michael C Pitter, Hoang N Giep, Bang N Giep, Terry W Grogg, K Anthony Shanbour, Darren W Goff, Helen B Hubert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with benign conditions involving high uterine weight and complex pathology.
METHODS: A multicenter study was undertaken in five community practice settings across the United States. All patients who had minimally invasive laparoscopic hysterectomy with robotic assistance March 2006 through July 2009 and uterine weights of at least 250 g were included. Retrospective chart review identified outcomes including skin-to-skin operative time, conversion to an exploratory laparotomy, blood loss, complications, and hospital duration of stay. The effect of uterine weight on skin-to-skin time and blood loss also was examined.
RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 256 patients with uteri weighing 250 to 3,020 g (median 453 g). Most patients were obese or had a history of pelvic or abdominal surgery. Median operative time was 145 minutes. Duration of surgery in patients with uteri 500 g or greater was significantly longer than in patients with uteri less than 500 g (167 compared with 126 minutes, P<.001). Median estimated blood loss also was greater in women with uteri weighing 500 g or more (100 compared with 50 mL, P<.001). Multivariable linear regression analysis confirmed the independent effect of uterine weight on operative time and blood loss. Median duration of hospital stay was 1 day. The conversion rate was 1.6%, the minor complication rate was 1.6%, and major complications occurred in 2.0% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Women with large uteri may successfully undergo robotically assisted hysterectomy with low morbidity, low blood loss, and minimal risk of conversion to laparotomy. Results were reproducible among general gynecologists from geographically diverse community settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20177284     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cf45ad

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  13 in total

Review 1.  Robotic surgery: review of the latest advances, risks, and outcomes.

Authors:  Mary Downes Gastrich; Joseph Barone; Gloria Bachmann; Mark Anderson; Adrian Balica
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-21

2.  Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015)

Authors:  K J Neis; W Zubke; T Römer; K Schwerdtfeger; T Schollmeyer; S Rimbach; B Holthaus; E Solomayer; B Bojahr; F Neis; C Reisenauer; B Gabriel; H Dieterich; I B Runnenbaum; W Kleine; A Strauss; M Menton; I Mylonas; M David; L-C Horn; D Schmidt; P Gaß; A T Teichmann; P Brandner; W Stummvoll; A Kuhn; M Müller; M Fehr; K Tamussino
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Influence of Morbid Obesity on Surgical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Abeer Eddib; Alexandra Danakas; Shawna Hughes; Mehmet Erk; Caroline Michalik; Madusudanan Sathia Narayanan; Venkat Krovi; Pankaj Singhal
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2014-04-01

4.  Does size matter? The effect of uterine weight on robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Mona E Orady; A Karim Nawfal; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-05-13

5.  Preemptive multimodal analgesia facilitates same-day discharge following robot-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  Thomas M Shultz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-05-28

6.  Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri.

Authors:  Dan-Arin Silasi; Taryn Gallo; Michelle Silasi; Gulden Menderes; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Lori Weinberg; Sanjay Rao; Pedro F Escobar
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-11-28

8.  Strategies to optimize the performance of Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  N Lambrou; R E Diaz; P Hinoul; D Parris; K Shoemaker; A Yoo; M Schwiers
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2014

9.  Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Indications of Uteri Less Than Fourteen Weeks Size Versus More Than Fourteen Weeks Size: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Anupama Bahadur; Mamta Kumawat; Latika Chawla; Dhriti Kapur; Yogesh Bahurupi; Rajlaxmi Mundhra
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-26

10.  Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches.

Authors:  Mona Orady; Alexander Hrynewych; A Karim Nawfal; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.