STUDY OBJECTIVES: The International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-2) criteria for low CSF hypocretin-1 levels (CSF hcrt-1) still need validation as a diagnostic tool for narcolepsy in different populations because inter-assay variability and different definitions of hypocretin deficiency complicate direct comparisons of study results. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Interviews, polysomnography, multiple sleep latency test, HLA-typing, and CSF hcrt-1 measurements in Danish patients with narcolepsy with cataplexy (NC) and narcolepsy without cataplexy (NwC), CSF hcrt-1 measurements in other hypersomnias, neurological and normal controls. Comparisons of hypocretin deficiency and frequency of HLA-DQB1*0602-positivity in the Danish and eligible NC and NwC populations (included via MEDLINE search), by (re)calculation of study results using the ICSD-2 criterion for low CSF hcrt-1 (< 30% of normal mean). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In Danes, low CSF hcrt-1 was present in 40/46 NC, 3/14 NwC and 0/106 controls (P < 0.0001). Thirty-nine of 41 NC and 4/13 NwC patients were HLA-DQB1*0602-positive (P < 0.01). Hypocretin-deficient NC patients had higher frequency of cataplexy, shorter mean sleep latency, more sleep onset REM periods (P < 0.05) and more awakenings (NS) than did NC patients with normal CSF hcrt-1. Across populations, low CSF hcrt-1 and HLA-DQB1*0602-positivity characterized the majority of NC (80% to 100%, P = 0.53; 80% to 100%, P = 0.11) but a minority of NwC patients (11% to 29%, P = 0.75; 29% to 89%, P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: The study provides evidence that hypocretin deficiency causes a more severe NC phenotype. The ICSD-2 criterion for low CSF hcrt-1 (< 30% of normal mean) is valid for diagnosing NC, but not NwC. HLA-typing should precede CSF hcrt-1 measurements because hypocretin deficiency is rare in HLA-DQB1*0602-negative patients.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-2) criteria for low CSF hypocretin-1 levels (CSF hcrt-1) still need validation as a diagnostic tool for narcolepsy in different populations because inter-assay variability and different definitions of hypocretin deficiency complicate direct comparisons of study results. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Interviews, polysomnography, multiple sleep latency test, HLA-typing, and CSF hcrt-1 measurements in Danish patients with narcolepsy with cataplexy (NC) and narcolepsy without cataplexy (NwC), CSF hcrt-1 measurements in other hypersomnias, neurological and normal controls. Comparisons of hypocretin deficiency and frequency of HLA-DQB1*0602-positivity in the Danish and eligible NC and NwC populations (included via MEDLINE search), by (re)calculation of study results using the ICSD-2 criterion for low CSF hcrt-1 (< 30% of normal mean). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In Danes, low CSF hcrt-1 was present in 40/46 NC, 3/14 NwC and 0/106 controls (P < 0.0001). Thirty-nine of 41 NC and 4/13 NwC patients were HLA-DQB1*0602-positive (P < 0.01). Hypocretin-deficient NCpatients had higher frequency of cataplexy, shorter mean sleep latency, more sleep onset REM periods (P < 0.05) and more awakenings (NS) than did NC patients with normal CSF hcrt-1. Across populations, low CSF hcrt-1 and HLA-DQB1*0602-positivity characterized the majority of NC (80% to 100%, P = 0.53; 80% to 100%, P = 0.11) but a minority of NwC patients (11% to 29%, P = 0.75; 29% to 89%, P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: The study provides evidence that hypocretin deficiency causes a more severe NC phenotype. The ICSD-2 criterion for low CSF hcrt-1 (< 30% of normal mean) is valid for diagnosing NC, but not NwC. HLA-typing should precede CSF hcrt-1 measurements because hypocretin deficiency is rare in HLA-DQB1*0602-negative patients.
Authors: B Ripley; S Overeem; N Fujiki; S Nevsimalova; M Uchino; J Yesavage; D Di Monte; K Dohi; A Melberg; G J Lammers; Y Nishida; F W Roelandse; M Hungs; E Mignot; S Nishino Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-12-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: C Peyron; J Faraco; W Rogers; B Ripley; S Overeem; Y Charnay; S Nevsimalova; M Aldrich; D Reynolds; R Albin; R Li; M Hungs; M Pedrazzoli; M Padigaru; M Kucherlapati; J Fan; R Maki; G J Lammers; C Bouras; R Kucherlapati; S Nishino; E Mignot Journal: Nat Med Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: S Nishino; T Kanbayashi; N Fujiki; M Uchino; B Ripley; M Watanabe; G J Lammers; H Ishiguro; S Shoji; Y Nishida; S Overeem; I Toyoshima; Y Yoshida; T Shimizu; S Taheri; E Mignot Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-09-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: T C Thannickal; R Y Moore; R Nienhuis; L Ramanathan; S Gulyani; M Aldrich; M Cornford; J M Siegel Journal: Neuron Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Sona Nevsimalova; Juraj Pisko; Jitka Buskova; David Kemlink; Iva Prihodova; Karel Sonka; Jelena Skibova Journal: J Neurol Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Sultan Cingoz; Sinem Agilkaya; Ibrahim Oztura; Secil Eroglu; Derya Karadeniz; Ahmet Evlice; Oguz Altungoz; Hikmet Yilmaz; Baris Baklan Journal: Genet Test Mol Biomarkers Date: 2014-02-26