A new pleosporalean family Tetraplosphaeriaceae is established to accommodate five new genera; 1) Tetraplosphaeria with small ascomata and anamorphs belonging to Tetraploa s. str., 2) Triplosphaeria characterised by hemispherical ascomata with rim-like side walls and anamorphs similar to Tetraploa but with three conidial setose appendages, 3) Polyplosphaeria with large ascomata surrounded by brown hyphae and anamorphs producing globose conidia with several setose appendages, 4) Pseudotetraploa, an anamorphic genus, having obpyriform conidia with pseudosepta and four to eight setose appendages, and 5) Quadricrura, an anamorphic genus, having globose conidia with one or two long setose appendages at the apex and four to five short setose appendages at the base. Fifteen new taxa in these genera mostly collected from bamboo are described and illustrated. They are linked by their Tetraploa s. l. anamorphs. To infer phylogenetic placement in the Pleosporales, analyses based on a combined dataset of small- and large-subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (SSU+LSU nrDNA) was carried out. Tetraplosphaeriaceae, however, is basal to the main pleosporalean clade and therefore its relationship with other existing families was not completely resolved. To evaluate the validity of each taxon and to clarify the phylogenetic relationships within this family, further analyses using sequences from ITS-5.8S nrDNA (ITS), transcription elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF), and beta-tubulin (BT), were also conducted. Monophyly of the family and that of each genus were strongly supported by analyses based on a combined dataset of the three regions (ITS+TEF+BT). Our results also suggest that Tetraplosphaeria (anamorph: Tetraploa s. str.) is an ancestral lineage within this family. Taxonomic placement of the bambusicolous fungi in Astrosphaeriella, Kalmusia, Katumotoa, Massarina, Ophiosphaerella, Phaeosphaeria, Roussoella, Roussoellopsis, and Versicolorisporium, are also discussed based on the SSU+LSU phylogeny.
A new pleosporalean family Tetraplosphaeriaceae is established to accommodate five new genera; 1) n class="Species">Tetraplosphaeria with small ascomata and anamorphs belonging to Tetraploa s. str., 2) Triplosphaeria characterised by hemispherical ascomata with rim-like side walls and anamorphs similar to Tetraploa but with three conidial setose appendages, 3) Polyplosphaeria with large ascomata surrounded by brown hyphae and anamorphs producing globose conidia with several setose appendages, 4) Pseudotetraploa, an anamorphic genus, having obpyriform conidia with pseudosepta and four to eight setose appendages, and 5) Quadricrura, an anamorphic genus, having globose conidia with one or two long setose appendages at the apex and four to five short setose appendages at the base. Fifteen new taxa in these genera mostly collected from bamboo are described and illustrated. They are linked by their Tetraploa s. l. anamorphs. To infer phylogenetic placement in the Pleosporales, analyses based on a combined dataset of small- and large-subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (SSU+LSU nrDNA) was carried out. Tetraplosphaeriaceae, however, is basal to the main pleosporalean clade and therefore its relationship with other existing families was not completely resolved. To evaluate the validity of each taxon and to clarify the phylogenetic relationships within this family, further analyses using sequences from ITS-5.8S nrDNA (ITS), transcription elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF), and beta-tubulin (BT), were also conducted. Monophyly of the family and that of each genus were strongly supported by analyses based on a combined dataset of the three regions (ITS+TEF+BT). Our results also suggest that Tetraplosphaeria (anamorph: Tetraploa s. str.) is an ancestral lineage within this family. Taxonomic placement of the bambusicolous fungi in Astrosphaeriella, Kalmusia, Katumotoa, Massarina, Ophiosphaerella, Phaeosphaeria, Roussoella, Roussoellopsis, and Versicolorisporium, are also discussed based on the SSU+LSU phylogeny.
Bamboo is the vernacular or common term applied to small to large woody
grasses ranging from 10 cm to 40 m in height. They are currently classified as
a subfamily Bambusoideae within the extensive grass family
Poaceae and comprise ca. 80–90 genera and 1
000–1 500 species. Indications are that major radiations of grasses
including Bambusoideae occurred 40–50 million yen class="Disease">ars ago in the
Paleogene age. Bamboos are distributed all over the world except in Europe
which has no native species, and are found at latitudes from 46 °N to 47
°S and from sea level to 4 000 m elevation. However, the major species
richness is found in the Asian Pacific region (China: 626, India: 102, Japan:
84) and South America (Brazil: 134, Venezuela: 68, Colombia: 56)
(Suzuki 1996,
Scurlock ,
Das ,
Sungkaew ). Approximately 1 500 commercial applications of bamboo
— as fishing rods, flutes, paper, flooring materials, foods and energy
feedstock — have been identified, and it is estimated that 2.5 billion
people depend on or use bamboo materials valued at US$ 7 billion per annum
(Scurlock , Bystriakova ).
In addition to studies on economically important bambusicolous pathogenic
fungi, such as Ceratosphaeria phyllostachydis and Stereostratum
corticioides (Hyde ), a large number of studies on saprobic (Hyde et
al. 2001,
2002c,
Zhou & Hyde 2002) and
endophytic fungi (Morakotkarn et al.
2007,
2008,
Tanaka & Tanaka 2008,
Tanaka )
have also been conducted due to the diversity of fungal species on bamboo.
According to Hyde et al.
(2002b), more than 1 100
fungal species have been described or recorded worldwide from bamboo. In
Japan, ca. 300 fungi are known from bamboo
(Tanaka & Harada 2004),
of which ca. 60 spp. belong to Dothideomycetes
(Anonymous 2000). This number
suggests that bamboo is a promising substrate for the study of
Dothideomycetes diversity. Several Dothideomycetes with
peculiar taxonomic features such as Shiraia
(Amano 1983) and
Katumotoa (Tanaka & Harada
2005b) have been reported from bamboo. However, phylogenetic
information based on molecular data is poorly known for many bambusicolous
fungi.In our ongoing study of bambusicolous fungi in Japan
(Shirouzu & Harada 2004,
Tanaka & Harada 2004,
2005a,
b,
Tanaka ,
Hatakeyama et al.
2005,
2008,
Sato ), we
encountered many undescribed Dothideomycetes resembling the genus
Massarina. These fungi produced n class="Species">Tetraploa-like anamorphs in
culture. The teleomorph-anamorph connection between Massarina and
Tetraploa has been elucidated based only on one example of M.
tetraploa and T. aristata on Carex
(Scheuer 1991), but the
molecular phylogenetic position of this species remains uncertain at the
familial/generic level.
Massarina is a taxonomically heterogenous genus in the order
Pleosporales, because n class="Species">Massarina s. l. contains many
phylogenetically unrelated elements. Attempts to revise the genus have been
undertaken by several authors (Bose
1961, Barr 1992,
Aptroot 1998). In particular,
Aptroot (1998) carried out
taxonomic re-assessment of 160 species that had been placed in this genus
previously and amended the generic concept of Masssarina by accepting
43 species in the genus. Nevertheless, this study also pointed out that
Massarina appears to be polyphyletic, because members of this genus
have diverse anamorphs, like Tetraploa, Periconia, Tumularia,
Ceratophoma, and others. Regarding this problem, Aptroot
(1998) noted that the species
accepted in Massarina may not form a monophyletic group; however, on
the basis of morphological characteristics, no clear subdivision could be
made. He further pointed out the need for examining the molecular and
ultrastructural characteristics to gain a better understanding of the
genus.
The current taxonomic concept of Massarina has been extensively
amended based on its DNA sequence data
(Liew ,
Belliveau & Bärlocher
2005, Kodsueb , Wang , Zhang ). Liew et al.
(2002) revealed that five
species of n class="Species">Massarina (e.g. M. corticola) possessing narrowly
fusiform ascospores belong to the genus Lophiostoma, which is
morphologically similar to Massarina, based on phylogenetic analyses
of SSU and ITS sequences of nrDNA. They further suggested that other
Massarina species with ascospores of similar morphology might have
affinity with Lophiostoma (Liew
). Following this suggestion, Hyde et
al. (2002a) transferred
26 species of Massarina to Lophiostoma primarily based on
their ascospore morphology. Massarinatetraploa, which produces the
Tetraploa anamorph, was also transferred to Lophiostoma
(Hyde ).
The phylogenetic position or the relationships of bambusicolous species
with fungi from non-bamboo host plants have not been established. In this
paper, phylogenetic analyses using 53 isolates of bambusicolous
Dothideomycetes were carried out based on a combined dataset of small
and large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (SSU+LSU), to infer their familial
placement. These analyses include species placed in Astrosphaeriella,
Kalmusia, Katumotoa, n class="Species">Massarina, Ophiosphaerella, Phaeosphaeria, Roussoella,
Roussoellopsis, and Versicolorisporium. Special emphasis was
paid to the taxonomy and phylogeny of Massarina s. l., which possess
Tetraploa-like hyphomycetous anamorphs. In order to assess their
validity at familial, generic and specific levels, phylogeny of 29 isolates
were analysed on the basis of their sequences from ITS-5.8S nrDNA (ITS),
transcription elongation factor 1-α (TEF) and β-tubulin (BT), as
well as SSU+LSU. We propose here a new family Tetraplosphaeriaceae to
encompass five new genera, Tetraplosphaeria, Triplosphaeria,
Polyplosphaeria, Pseudotetraploa and Quadricrura. Fifteen new
taxa in these genera are also described and illustrated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Morphological studies and fungal isolates
Measurements of all structures were taken from material mounted in water.
n class="Chemical">India ink was added to water mounts to detect the gelatinous sheath and
ascospore appendages. To observe the internal conidial structure, 5 % sodium
hypochlorite solution (NaClO) was used for bleaching of strongly melanised
spores as described in Eriksson
(1989). The ascospore septum
position was noted using the decimal system
(Shoemaker 1984,
Raja ). To
observe details of ascomal anatomy, ascomata were boiled in water for a few
minutes and sectioned with a freezing microtome (HM 400R; MICROM, Germany).
Light microscopy observations were conducted using an Olympus microscope
(BX51) equipped with Nomarski interference differential contrast objectives.
Specimens cited in this paper are maintained at the herbaria of Hirosaki
University (HHUF) and National Museum of Nature and Science (TNS), and some
materials were borrowed from the herbaria of Yamaguchi University (YAM) and
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz (GZU).
Single ascospore cultures were obtained according to the methods of Tubaki
(1978). Growth rate and
colony characteristics were recorded from cultures grown on potato-dextrose
n class="Chemical">agar (PDA, Difco) within 3 wk at 25 °C in the dark. Colours were
designated according to Kornerup & Wanscher
(1978). Induction of
anamorph/teleomorph formation was attempted by culturing the isolates on rice
straw agar (RSA; Tanaka & Harada
2003a) and/or incubating small colony pieces in sterilised water
(Scheuer 1991,
Hatakeyama ). Fungal cultures newly obtained in this study were deposited
at the CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre (Centraalbureau voor
Schimmelcultures; CBS), the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM), the
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, Japan (MAFF), and the
National Biological Resources Center, Japan (NBRC)
(Table 1).
Table 1.
Cultures and Genbank accession number of bambusicolous fungi used in this
study.
Taxon
Hosta)
Original no.
Herbarium no.
Strain no.
GenBank no.
SSU
LSU
ITS
BT
TEF
Astrosphaeriella aggregata
9
KT 767
HHUF 28232
MAFF 239485
AB524449
AB524590
—
—
—
7
KT 984
HHUF 28233
MAFF 239486
AB524450
AB524591
—
—
—
Astrosphaeriella stellata
7
KT 998
HHUF 28494
MAFF 239487
AB524451
AB524592
—
—
—
Kalmusia scabrispora
7
KT 1023
HHUF 28608
JCM 12851 = MAFF 239517
AB524452
AB524593
—
—
—
7
KT 2202
HHUF 30013
NBRC 106237
AB524453
AB524594
—
—
—
Katumotoa bambusicola
9
KT 1517a
HHUF 28661
JCM 13131 = MAFF 239641
AB524454
AB524595
—
—
—
Massarina arundinariae
7
KT 856
HHUF 27547
MAFF 239461
AB524455
AB524596
AB524786
AB524848
AB524817
7
KT 2200
HHUF 30014
NBRC 106238
AB524456
AB524597
AB524787
AB524849
AB524818
7
KT 1034
HHUF 30015
NBRC 106239
AB524457
AB524598
—
—
—
Ophiosphaerella sasicola
9
KT 1706
HHUF 29443
JCM 13134 = MAFF 239644
AB524458
AB524599
—
—
—
Phaeosphaeria brevispora
12
KT 1466
HHUF 28229
MAFF 239276
AB524459
AB524600
—
—
—
9
KT 2313
HHUF 30016
NBRC 106240
AB524460
AB524601
—
—
—
Phaeosphaeria sp.
9
KT 2564
HHUF 30017
NBRC 106255
AB524461
AB524602
—
—
—
Polyplosphaeria fusca
7
KT 1043
HHUF 29392
JCM 13173 = MAFF 239683
AB524462
AB524603
AB524788
AB524850
AB524819
8
KT 1616
HHUF 29399
JCM 13175 = MAFF 239685
AB524463
AB524604
AB524789
AB524851
AB524820
4
KT 1640
HHUF 29405
JCM 13176 = MAFF 239686
AB524464
AB524605
AB524790
AB524852
AB524821
3
KT 1686
HHUF 29406
JCM 13177 = MAFF 239687
AB524465
AB524606
—
—
—
9
KT 2124
HHUF 30018
CBS 125425
AB524466
AB524607
AB524791
AB524853
AB524822
Pseudotetraploa curviappendiculata
9
HC 4930
HHUF 28582
JCM 12852 = MAFF 239495
AB524467
AB524608
AB524792
AB524854
AB524823
9
HC 4932
HHUF 28590
MAFF 239496
AB524468
AB524609
AB524793
AB524855
AB524824
9
KT 2558
HHUF 30019
CBS 125426 = NBRC
106241
AB524469
AB524610
AB524794
AB524856
AB524825
Pseudotetraploa javanica
8
HC 4934
HHUF 28596
JCM 12854 = MAFF 239498
AB524470
AB524611
AB524795
AB524857
AB524826
Pseudotetraploa longissima
8
HC 4933
HHUF 28580
JCM 12853 = MAFF 239497
AB524471
AB524612
AB524796
AB524858
AB524827
Quadricrura bicornis
5
yone 153
HHUF 30023
CBS 125427
AB524472
AB524613
AB524797
AB524859
AB524828
Quadricrura meridionalis
3
KT 2607
HHUF 30024
CBS 125684 = NBRC
106242
AB524473
AB524614
AB524798
AB524860
AB524829
Quadricrura septentrionalis
9
HC 4983
HHUF 28781
CBS 125429
AB524474
AB524615
AB524799
AB524861
AB524830
9
HC 4984
HHUF 28782
CBS 125430
AB524475
AB524616
AB524800
AB524862
AB524831
9
KT 920
HHUF 30020
CBS 125428
AB524476
AB524617
AB524801
AB524863
AB524832
9
yone 44
HHUF 29747
CBS 125431
AB524477
AB524618
AB524802
AB524864
AB524833
9
yone 176
HHUF 30021
CBS 125432 = NBRC
106243
AB524478
AB524619
AB524803
AB524865
AB524834
9
yone 179
HHUF 30022
CBS 125433 = NBRC
106244
AB524479
AB524620
AB524804
AB524866
AB524835
Roussoella hysterioides
13
KT 1651
HHUF 29217
JCM 13126 = MAFF 239636
AB524480
AB524621
—
—
—
Roussoella hysterioides
9
HH 26988
HHUF 26988
CBS 125434
AB524481
AB524622
—
—
—
Roussoella pustulans
9
KT 1709
HHUF 29229
JCM 13127 = MAFF 239637
AB524482
AB524623
—
—
—
Roussoella sp.
9
KT 2303
HHUF 30025
NBRC 106245
AB524483
AB524624
—
—
—
Roussoellopsis tosaensis
3
KT 1659
HHUF 29234
JCM 13128 = MAFF 239638
AB524484
AB524625
—
—
—
Roussoellopsis sp.
9
KT 1710
HHUF 30026
NBRC 106246
AB524485
AB524626
—
—
—
Tetraploa aristata
1
-
CBS H-18781
CBS 996.70
AB524486
AB524627
AB524805
AB524867
AB524836
Tetraploa sp. 1
3
KT 1684
HHUF 29625
JCM 14424
AB524487
AB524628
—
—
—
Tetraploa sp. 2
6
KT 2578
HHUF 30027
NBRC 106251
AB524488
AB524629
—
—
—
Tetraplosphaeria nagasakiensis
3
KT 1682
HHUF 29378
JCM 13168 = MAFF 239678
AB524489
AB524630
AB524806
AB524868
AB524837
Tetraplosphaeria sasicola
11
KT 563
HHUF 27566
JCM 13167 = MAFF 239677
AB524490
AB524631
AB524807
AB524869
AB524838
Tetraplosphaeria yakushimensis
2
KT 1906
HHUF 29652
CBS 125435
AB524491
AB524632
AB524808
AB524870
AB524839
Trisplophaeria acuta
10
KT 1170
HHUF 29387
JCM 13171 = MAFF 239681
AB524492
AB524633
AB524809
AB524871
AB524840
Triplosphaeria cylindrica
9
KT 1256
HHUF 29381
JCM 13169 = MAFF 239679
AB524493
AB524634
—
—
—
9
KT 1800
HHUF 29626
JCM 14425
AB524494
AB524635
AB524810
AB524872
AB524841
9
KT 2550
HHUF 30028
NBRC 106247
AB524495
AB524636
AB524811
AB524873
AB524842
Triplosphaeria maxima
9
KT 870
HHUF 29390
JCM 13172 = MAFF 239682
AB524496
AB524637
AB524812
AB524874
AB524843
Triplosphaeria yezoensis
9
KT 1715
HHUF 30029
CBS 125436
AB524497
AB524638
AB524813
AB524875
AB524844
12
KT 1732
HHUF 30030
CBS 125437
AB524498
AB524639
AB524814
AB524876
AB524845
Triplosphaeria sp.
9
HC 4665
HHUF 27481
NBRC 106248
AB524499
AB524640
AB524815
AB524877
AB524846
Triplosphaeria sp.
9
KT 2546
HHUF 30031
NBRC 106249
AB524500
AB524641
AB524816
AB524878
AB524847
Versicolorisporium triseptatum
8
SH 130
HHUF 28815
JCM 14775
AB524501
AB330081
—
—
—
1. Alpinia formosa; 2. Arundo donax; 3. bamboo; 4.
Chimonobambusa marmorea; 5. conifer; 6. gramineae; 7.
Phyllostachys bambusoides; 8. Pleioblastus chino; 9.
Sasa kurilensis; 10. Sasa nipponica; 11. Sasa
senanensis; 12. Sasa sp.; 13. Sasa veitchii
Cultures and Genbank accession number of bambusicolous fungi used in this
study.1. Alpinia formosa; 2. Arundo donax; 3. bamboo; 4.
Chimonobambusa marmorea; 5. conifer; 6. gramineae; 7.
Phyllostachys bambusoides; 8. Pleioblastus chino; 9.
Sasa kurilensis; 10. Sasa nipponica; 11. Sasa
senanensis; 12. Sasa sp.; 13. Sasa veitchii
DNA extraction and amplification
Mycelia were grown in malt extract broth (20 g malt extract, 1 000 mL
distilled water). DNA from mycelia was extracted using the ISOPLANT Kit
(Nippon Gene, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Partial SSU
(ca. 1 000–1 300 bp of the 5' end) and LSU nrDNA (ca.
1 250 bp of the 5' end) regions were determined for 53 isolates mostly
obtained from bamboo to reveal their familial or generic positions; and
complete internally transcribed spacers (ITS) region of nrDNA (ca.
500 bp), the intron sequence of the n class="Gene">TEF gene (ca. 300 bp), and exons
1 to 6 with the respective introns of the BT gene (ca. 600 bp) were
sequenced for 31 isolates to confirm their generic or species validities
(Table 1). These regions were
amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primer pairs
NS1–NS4 (White ) and LR0R–LR7
(Rehner & Samuels 1994)
for SSU and LSU, respectively. Three primer sets, ITS1–ITS4
(White ),
EF1-728F–EF1-986R (Carbone &
Kohn 1999), and T1–BT2B
(Glass & Donaldson 1995,
O'Donnell & Cigelnik 1997)
were used for the amplification of ITS, TEF and BT, respectively.
Amplifications were conducted in 25 μL of PCR mixtures containing 1 μM
of each primer, 0.125 U TaKaRa Ex Taq polymerase (TaKaRa Bio, Otsu,
Japan), dNTP mixture (2.5 mM each stock), and Ex Taq reaction buffer
(containing 2 mM Mg2+). PCR was carried out as follows: initial
denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C
for 1 min; annealing for 1 min at 48.8 °C for SSU nrDNA, 46.2 °C for
LSU nrDNA, 61.5 °C for ITS, 57.2 °C for TEF, and 60 °C for BT; an
extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 7
min. The size of PCR products were verified using 7.5 % poly-acrylamide gels
stained with ethidium bromide, and then sequenced directly at SORGENT Co.,
Ltd. (Korea).
Phylogenetic analyses
Preliminary multiple alignments of sequences were conducted using MAFFT v.
6 (Katoh ;
http://align.bmr.kyushu-u.ac.jp/mafft/software).
Final alignments were manually adjusted using BioEdit v. 7.08
(Hall 1999). Alignment gaps
and ambiguous positions were excluded from the analyses. Alignments used in
this study were deposited in TreeBASE (S2505).Two phylogenetic analyses, maximum-parsimony (MP) using a
close-neighbour-interchange heuristic search with an initial tree by random
addition sequence (100 replicates) and neighbour-joining (NJ) based on the
Kimura 2-parameter substitution model, were carried out using MEGA v. 4
(Tamura ). Characters were weighted equally and gaps were excluded.
The bootstrap support (BS) values for nodes were computed from 1 000
replicates for both the MP and NJ analyses. In addition to these analyses,
Bayesian analyses were done using MrBayes v. 3.1.2
(Ronquist & Huelsenbeck
2003). MrModeltest v. 2.2
(Nylander 2004) in conjunction
with PAUP 4.0b10 (Swofford
2003) was used to select substitution models for Bayesian
analyses. On the basis of AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) of MrModeltest v.
2.2, a GTR+I+G model for the SSU+LSU nrDNA, ITS and BT, and a HKY+I+G model
for n class="Gene">TEF gene sequences were applied. Two runs with 10 chains of Markov chain
Monte Carlo (MCMC) iterations were performed for 6 million and 1.2 million
generations, keeping one tree every 100 generations, for a combined alignment
of the SSU+LSU nrDNA sequences and the ITS+TEF+BT gene sequences,
respectively. The first 5 million generations of the SSU + LSU and 200 000
generations of the ITS+TEF+BT were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining 20
002 trees were used to calculate 50 % majority rule trees and to determine the
posterior probabilities (PP) for the individual branches.
RESULTS
Taxonomy
A new family, Tetraplosphaeriaceae typified by
n class="Species">Tetraplosphaeria, is established in this paper. This family includes
five new genera, 1) Tetraplosphaeria with small ascomata and
anamorphs belonging to Tetraploa s. str., 2) Triplosphaeria
characterised by hemispherical ascomata with rim-like side walls and anamorphs
similar to Tetraploa but with three conidial setose appendages, 3)
Polyplosphaeria with large-sized ascomata surrounded by brown hyphae
and anamorphs producing globose conidia with several setose appendages, 4)
Pseudotetraploa, an anamorphic genus, having obpyriform conidia with
pseudosepta and four to eight setose appendages, and 5) Quadricrura,
an anamorphic genus, having globose conidia with one or two long apical setose
appendages and four to five short basal setose appendages. Fifteen new taxa of
these genera are described below.
Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray., fam.
nov. MycoBank
MB515253.Etymology: In reference to the name of the type genus.Ascomata immersa vel superficialia, globosa vel subglobosa. Rostrum
breviter papillatum vel cylindricum, interdum nullum. Pseudoparaphyses
septatae, ramificantes. Asci fissitunicati, cylindrici vel clavati, octospori.
Ascosporae anguste fusiformes vel late cylindricae, 1–3-septatae,
hyalinae vel brunneae, cum vagina gelatinosa obtectae. Anamorphosis
n class="Species">Tetraploa sensu lato. Conidiophora absentia. Cellulae conidiogenae
monoblasticae. Conidia brunnea, cum plus quam 3–8 appendicibus.
Ascomata scattered to gregarious, immersed to superficial, globose
to subglobose, glabrous or with brown hyphae. Beak short-papillate to
cylindrical or absent, central. Ascomatal wall composed of hyaline to
brown cells, sometimes with rim-like structure at the sides and poorly
developed at the base. Pseudoparaphyses cellular or trabeculae,
septate, branched. Asci fissitunicate, basal to somewhat lateral,
cylindrical to clavate, short-stalked, with 8 ascospores. Ascospores
narrowly fusiform to broadly cylindrical, straight or slightly curved,
1–3-septate, hyaline to pale brown, smooth, surrounded by an entire
mucilaginous sheath or narrow appendage-like sheath. Anamorph
n class="Species">Tetraploa-like. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous
cells monoblastic. Conidia composed of 3–8 columns or
internal hyphal structure, brown, mostly verrucose at the base, with more than
3–8 setose appendages.
Type genus: Tetraplosphaeria Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray.,
gen. nov.Notes: Tetraplosphaeriaceae fits well in the
Pleosporales on morphological grounds, but there is no suitable
family to accommodate it in this order. The most common diagnostic features of
this family are Massarina-like teleomorphs with almost hyaline
1(–3)-septate ascospores and/or Tetraploa-like anamorphs with
several setose appendages.Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray., gen.
nov. MycoBank
MB515254.Anamorph: Tetraploa Berk. & Broome.Etymology: In reference to the anamorphic state belonging to
Tetraploa.Ascomata immersa vel erumpentia, globosa vel subglobosa. Rostrum breviter
papillatum vel cylindricum. Pseudoparaphyses septatae, ramificantes et
anastomosantes. Asci fissitunicati, cylindrici vel clavati, octospori.
Ascosporae anguste fusiformes, 1-septatae, hyalinae, cum vagina gelatinosa
obtectae. Anamorphosis n class="Species">Tetraploa sensu stricto. Conidiophora
absentia. Cellulae conidiogenae monoblasticae. Conidia breviter cylindricae
vel obpyriformes, brunnea, cum 4 appendicibus.
Ascomata scattered to gregarious, immersed to erumpent, globose to
subglobose, glabrous. Beak short-papillate to cylindrical, central,
with periphyses. Ascomatal wall composed of nearly rectangular to
polygonal thin-walled cells, sometimes poorly developed at the base.
Pseudoparaphyses cellular, septate, branched. Asci
fissitunicate, basal to somewhat lateral, cylindrical to clavate,
short-stalked, with 8 ascospores. Ascospores narrowly fusiform,
straight or slightly curved, with a septum and slightly constricted, hyaline,
smooth, surrounded by a narrow mucilaginous appendage-like sheath.
Anamorph n class="Species">Tetraploa s. str. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous
cells monoblastic. Conidia composed of 4 columns,
short-cylindrical, brown, verrucose at the base, euseptate, with 4 setose
appendages at the apex.
Type species: Tetraplosphaeria sasicola Kaz. Tanaka &
K. Hiray., sp. nov.Notes: A new genus Tetraplosphaeria is erected to
accommodate four pleosporalean species having
n class="Species">Massarina/Lophiostoma-like teleomorphs and anamorphs
belonging to Tetraploa s. str. These species do not have clypeate
stromata around the ascomatal beak similar to the type species of
Massarina (M. eburnea;
Hyde 1995). Some species in
Tetraplosphaeria have a well-developed beak similar to
Lophiostoma species, but they do not have slit-like ostioles which is
a characteristic feature of Lophiostoma
(Holm & Holm 1988,
Tanaka & Harada 2003a,
Tanaka & Hosoya
2008).
Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray.,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515259.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Tetraplosphaeria nagasakiensis. A. Ascomata on host surface.
B–F. Ascospores; G. Ascoma in longitudinal section; H–I. Asci; J.
Pseudoparaphyses; K. Ascomal wall; L. Ascomata on rice straw agar; M. Conidia
on agar piece immersed in water; N–O. Conidia; P. Conidial body; Q.
Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A = 500
μm; B–F, P = 10 μm; G, L = 100 μm; H–K = 20 μm; M =
200 μm; N–O = 50 μm; Q = 1 cm. A–D, G–H, K from HHUF
29378 holotype; E–F, I–J, L–Q from culture KT 1682.
Anamorph: Tetraploa aristata s. l.Etymology: In reference to the collection site.Ascomata 260–330 × 290–350 μm, immersa vel erumpentia,
globosa vel subglobosa. Rostrum 75–150 × 85–110 μm,
ostiolatum. Paries ascomatis 17–30 μm crassus ad latus, ex cellulis
5–6-stratis 5–13 x 2.5–5 μm compositus. Pseudoparaphyses
1–3 μm latae, septatae, ramificantes et anastomosantes. Asci
(82–)86–105(–110) × 10.5–13.5 μm,
fissitunicati, cylindrici vel clavati, octospori. Ascosporae
(27–)29–35(–37) × 3.5–6 μm, anguste
fusiformes, 1-septatae, hyalinae, cum vagina gelatinosa obtectae. Anamorphosis
n class="Species">Tetraploa sensu stricto. Conidia in vitro
(28–)32.5–42(–43) × 20–33 μm, brunnea, cum 4
appendicibus; appendices (70–)95–225(–263) μm longae,
3–13-septatae.
Ascomata 260–330 μm high, 290–350 μm diam,
scattered to gregarious, immersed in sheath or erumpent from bare culm,
globose to n class="Chemical">subglobose, with sparse brown hyphae at sides. Beak
75–150 μm long, 85–110 μm diam, central, papillate to
cylindrical, composed of dark brown, thick-walled cells, with numerous
periphyses. Ascomatal wall at sides 17–30 μm thick, composed
of 5–6 layers of rectanglar to polygonal brown cells of 5–13
× 2.5–5 μm, at the base 5–7.5 μm thick, composed of
globose to polygonal cells of 2.5–7.5 μm diam.
Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–3 μm thick, branched and
anastomosed, with slime coating. Asci
(82–)86–105(–110) × 10.5–13.5 μm (av. 95.4
× 11.9 μm, n = 50), fissitunicate, numerous, basal to
somewhat lateral, clavate to cylindrical, short-stalked (ca.
10–20 μm long), 8-spored. Ascospores
(27–)29–35(–37) × 3.5–6 μm (av. 32 ×
4.4 μm, n = 100), L/W 5.9–8.5 (av. 7.3, n = 100),
narrowly fusiform with acute ends, slightly curved, with a septum nearly
median (0.48–0.52; av. 0.50, n = 100), hyaline, smooth, with
bipolar elongated sheath of 1–3 μm long at both ends (but in india
ink, an entire sheath 13–18 μm thick at sides is observed).
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining a n class="Chemical">diam of
1.1–1.2 cm, dull-green (28E4;
Kornerup & Wanscher 1978);
reverse almost black; no pigment produced. On RSA both teleomorphic and
anamorphic states are produced. Ascospores are slightly smaller than those on
the host, measuring 29–32 × 5 μm. Anamorph is
Tetraploa aristata s. l. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous
cells monoblastic. Conidia produced directly on the mycelium,
solitary, short cylindrical, brown, clearly verruculose,
(28–)32.5–42(–43) × 20–33 μm (av. 37.4
× 27.2 μm, n = 30), L/W 1.2–1.7 (av. 1.4, n =
30), 5–6-celled, composed of 4 columns and 4 setose appendages.
Appendages (70–)95–225(–263) μm long (av. 161.2 μm,
n = 100), 2–3 μm wide at the apex, 5.5–8 μm at the
base, with 3–13-septa at 10 to 25 μm intervals.
Specimen examined: Japan, Nagasaki, Nagayo, Nagasaki
Siebold University, on culms of bamboo, 30 May 2004, K. Tanaka & S.
Hatakeyama, HHUF 29378 holotype designated here, living culture KTC
1682 (= JCM 13168 = MAFF 239678).Notes: This species is most similar to Tetraplosphaeria
yakushimensis in having ascospores overlapping in size, but T.
nagasakiensis differs from the latter in the dimension of conidia and the
length of conidial appendages. The n class="Species">Tetraploa state of T.
nagasakiensis shares some features with Tetraploa aristata
(Berkeley & Broome 1850,
Ellis 1949), but has larger
conidia (av. 37.4 × 27.2 μm vs. 31.8 × 20.6 μm) and
considerably longer conidial appendages (av. 161.2 μm vs. 36 μm).
Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray.,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515260.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Tetraplosphaeria sasicola. A. Ascomata on host surface; B–F.
Ascospores; G. Ascoma in longitudinal section; H–I. Asci; J.
Pseudoparaphyses; K. Conidia on rice straw agar; L–M. Conidia; N.
Conidial body; O. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale
bars: A = 500 μm; B–F, J, N = 10 μm; G, L–M = 50 μm;
H–I = 20 μm; K = 100 μm; O = 1 cm. A–J from HHUF 27566
holotype; K–O from culture KT 563.
Anamorph: Tetraploa ellisii s. l.Etymology: In reference to the host plant of collection.Ascomata 150–200 × 230–290 μm, immersa vel erumpentia,
globosa vel subglobosa. Rostrum 30–40 × 50–55 μm,
ostiolatum. Paries ascomatis 12–20 μm crassus ad latus, ex cellulis
3–6-stratis 7–13 × 2–5 μm compositus.
Pseudoparaphyses 1.5–2.5 μm latae, septatae, ramificantes et
anastomosantes. Asci (61–)65–89(–100) ×
9–11(–13) μm, fissitunicati, clavati vel cylindrici, octospori.
Ascosporae 22.5–31.5(–34) × 3–5 μm, anguste
fusiformes, 1-septatae, hyalinae, cum vagina gelatinosa obtectae. Anamorphosis
n class="Species">Tetraploa sensu stricto. Conidia in vitro
(32–)35–50(–52.5) × 20–30 μm, brunnea, cum 4
appendicibus; appendices (88–)113–190(–200) μm longae,
9–15-septatae.
Ascomata 150–200 μm high, 230–290 μm diam,
scattered, immersed below the epidermis, later erumpent, globose to n class="Chemical">subglobose
with a flattened base, glabrous. Beak short-papillate, 30–40
μm high, 50–55 μm diam, central, composed of globose to polygonal
dark brown thick-walled cells of 3–6 μm diam, with sparse short
periphyses. Ascomatal wall 12–20 μm thick at sides, composed
of 3–6 layers of rectangular to polygonal hyaline to pale brown cells of
7–13 × 2–5 μm; at the base much thinner, of compressed
small hyaline cells. Pseudoparaphyses cellular, numerous,
1.5–2.5 μm thick, septate, branched. Asci
(61–)65–89(–100) × 9–11(–13) μm (av.
76.6 × 9.9 μm, n = 50), fissitunicate, numerous, basal to
somewhat lateral, clavate to cylindrical, short-stalked (ca.
5–15 μm long), with 8 ascospores triseriate to biseriate above and
uniseriate below. Ascospores 22.5–31.5(–34) ×
3–5 μm (av. 26.8 × 3.7 μm, n = 80), L/W
6.4–8.3 (av. 7.2, n = 80), narrowly fusiform, straight or
slightly curved, with a submedian (0.49–0.54; av. 0.51, n = 51)
septum and slightly constricted, hyaline, smooth, surrounded by a narrow
mucilaginous sheath, 2–6 μm long at the apex, 1–3 μm long at
the base, slightly wider at sides of septum. Senescent spores pale brown.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 3.5–4 cm
n class="Chemical">diam, velvety in appearance, grey (7C1), with entire margin; reverse
pompeian-red (9C7), and coral (9B7) pigment produced. On RSA,
Tetraploa state similar to T. ellisii is formed on the
surface of rice straw within 2 mo. Conidia produced directly on the
mycelium, solitary, short cylindrical, brown, slightly verruculose,
(32–)35–50(–52.5) × 20–30 μm (av. 41.2
× 26 μm, n = 43), L/W 1.3–1.9 (av. 1.6, n =
42), composed of 4 columns. The columns 12.5–15(–19.5) μm diam,
5–6-celled. Setose appendages 4, brown,
(88–)113–190(–200) μm long (av. 142.9 μm, n =
21), 2–4 μm wide at the apex, with 9–15-septa at 10 to 20 μm
intervals. After the conidial state is formed, the ascomatal state is soon
found. Asci 66–107 × 8–11 μm (av. 84.5 ×
9.9 μm, n = 36). Ascospores similar in appearance to
those on the host, but slightly larger, measuring 25–35 ×
3.5–5.5 μm (av. 29.8 × 4.5 μm, n = 75), L/W
5.9–7.5 (av. 6.6, n = 75), with a mid-septum submedian
(0.50–0.53; av. 0.51, n = 55).
Tetraplosphaeria nagasakiensis. A. Ascomata on host surface.
B–F. Ascospores; G. Ascoma in longitudinal section; H–I. Asci; J.
Pseudoparaphyses; K. Ascomal wall; L. Ascomata onrice straw agar; M. Conidia
on agar piece immersed in water; N–O. Conidia; P. Conidial body; Q.
Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A = 500
μm; B–F, P = 10 μm; G, L = 100 μm; H–K = 20 μm; M =
200 μm; N–O = 50 μm; Q = 1 cm. A–D, G–H, K from HHUF
29378 holotype; E–F, I–J, L–Q from culture KT 1682.Tetraplosphaeria sasicola. A. Ascomata on host surface; B–F.
Ascospores; G. Ascoma in longitudinal section; H–I. Asci; J.
Pseudoparaphyses; K. Conidia onrice straw agar; L–M. Conidia; N.
Conidial body; O. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale
bars: A = 500 μm; B–F, J, N = 10 μm; G, L–M = 50 μm;
H–I = 20 μm; K = 100 μm; O = 1 cm. A–J from HHUF 27566
holotype; K–O from culture KT 563.Specimen examined: Japan, Hokkaido, Yoichi, Sawamachi
(140°46'E, 43°11'N), on culms of Sasa senanensis, 7 July
2001, K. Tanaka, HHUF 27566 holotype designated here, living culture
KTC 563 (= JCM 13167 = MAFF 239677).Notes: This species is characterised by the smallest asci and
ascospores. The conidial morphology of this species resembles that of
Tetraploa ellisii, but the latter species has more slender conidia
(30–51 × 15–26 μm, L/W 1.9;
Ellis 1949).(Scheuer) Kaz. Tanaka & K.
Hiray., comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515261.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Tetraplosphaeria tetraploa. A. Ascomata on host surface;
B–C. Ascomata in longitudinal section; D–G. Ascospores; H. Asci;
I. Pseudoparaphyses; J. Conidia on malt extract agar; K–L. Conidia;
M–N. Conidial bodies. Scale bars: A = 500 μm; B–C = 50 μm;
D–G, M–N = 10 μm; H–I = 20 μm; J–L = 100 μm.
A–I from GZU 36-91 holotype of Massarina tetraploa; J–N
from GZU 32-91 (dried culture specimen of Tetraploa state).
Basionym: Massarinatetraploa Scheuer, Mycol. Res. 95:
126. 1991.≡ Lophiostoma tetraploa (Scheuer) Aptroot & K.D. Hyde,
in Hyde, Wong & Aptroot, Fungal Diversity Res. Ser. (Hong Kong) 7: 108.
2002.Anamorph: Tetraploa aristata s. l.Ascomata 180–200 μm high, 150–280 μm diam,
scattered, immersed, globose to somewhat pyriform, glabrous to sometimes
covered with spn class="Disease">arse brown hyphae at sides. Beak
50–80(–100) μm long, 50–75 μm diam, central, papillate
to short cylindrical, composed of subglobose to polygonal cells, with hyaline
periphyses. Ascomatal wall uniformly 6–12 μm thick, composed
of 3–4 layers of polygonal brown cells (3.5–12.5 ×
2.5–5 μm). Pseudoparaphyses cellular, 1.5–2.5 μm
wide, branched and anastomosed, with septa at 8 to 15 μm intervals.
Asci (90–)95–128(–140) ×
13–16(–19) μm (av. 109.4 × 14.2 μm, n = 50),
numerous, basal, fissitunicate, cylindrical, with a short stipe of 5–15
μm long, with 8 biseriate ascospores. Ascospores
(29–)32–41.5(–43) × 4–6(–7) μm (av. 37
× 5.2 μm, n = 50), L/W 6.4–8.1 (av. 7.1, n =
50), narrowly fusiform with acute ends, slightly curved, with a septum
supramedian (0.44–0.49; av. 0.47, n = 45) and constricted,
hyaline, smooth, with a sheath; sheath entire, narrow, 2–4 μm long at
both ends, 1–1.5 μm thick at upper of the septum.
Tetraplosphaeria tetraploa. A. Ascomata on host surface;
B–C. Ascomata in longitudinal section; D–G. Ascospores; H. Asci;
I. Pseudoparaphyses; J. Conidia on malt extract agar; K–L. Conidia;
M–N. Conidial bodies. Scale bars: A = 500 μm; B–C = 50 μm;
D–G, M–N = 10 μm; H–I = 20 μm; J–L = 100 μm.
A–I from GZU 36-91 holotype of Massarinatetraploa; J–N
from GZU 32-91 (dried culture specimen of Tetraploa state).Culture characteristics: Not examined. According to Scheuer
(1991) this fungus produces
Tetraploa aristata as anamorph. The anamorph on the dried culture
specimen (GZU 32-91) examined in this study is as follows: Conidia
30–33 × 23–25 μm (av. 30.8 × 23.3 μm, n
= 6), L/W = 1.3, solitaly, short cylindrical, pale brown, verrucose, consist
of 4 columns of 10–13 μm wide, 4-n class="Chemical">celled. Appendages 263–350
μm long (av. 295.8 μm, n = 6), 10–13 μm thick at the
base, 2–3 μm at the apex, 17–22-septate, pale brown at the base
and almost hyaline at the apex, smooth, unbranched, straight.
Specimens examined: U.K., England, Exeter, Exminster
marshes, on leaves of n class="Species">Carex acutiformis, 13 Nov. 1988, Ch. Scheuer,
GZU 36-91 holotype of Massarinatetraploa; Dried culture
specimen of conidial state grown on malt extract agar (derived from ex-type
culture), GZU 32-91.
Notes: This species was originally described as a species of
Massarina (Scheuer
1991), but later was transferred to the n class="Disease">genus Lophiostoma
(Hyde ).
The original strain isolated by Scheuer
(1991) from the holotype of
Massarinatetraploa is no longer preserved (Scheuer, pers. comm.).
There is one strain that is deposited as M. tetraploa in CBS
(CBS 101683), but
it is considered as a misidentified material because it produced a
Phaeosphaeria-like teleomorph having 39–49 ×
5.5–6.5 μm, yellowish, 3-septate ascospores on RSA. Therefore, M.
tetraploa was not included in phylogenetic analyses in this study.
However, morphological evidence obtained from the holotype and the dried
culture specimen (anamorphic state) of M. tetraploa clearly indicates
that it belongs to Tetraplosphaeria. This species can be
distinguished from other species of this genus by the large-sized asci and
ascospores. The anamorph of this species has been reported as Tetraploa
aristata (Scheuer 1991),
but the presence of several T. aristata-like anamorphs with sequence
differences revealed in this study suggest that redefinition of T.
aristata along with molecular evidence would be required for this
anamorphic species.
Kaz. Tanaka, K. Hiray. &
Hosoya, sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515262.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Tetraplosphaeria yakushimensis. A. Ascomata on host surface; B.
Ascoma in longitudinal section; C–F. Ascospores; G–H, Asci; I.
Ascus with an ocular chamber; J. Pseudoparaphyses; K. Conidia on agar piece
immersed in water; L. Conidia; M. Conidia with verruculose ornamentation; N.
Conidial body; O. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale
bars: A = 500 μm; B–E, I–J, M–N = 10 μm; F, L = 50
μm; G–H = 20 μm; K = 100 μm; O = 1 cm. A–J from HHUF
29652 holotype; K–O from culture KT 1906.
Anamorph: Tetraploa aristata s. l.Etymology: In reference to the collection site.Ascomata 135–180 × 150–250 μm, immersa, subglobosa.
Rostrum 50 × 55–65 μm, ostiolatum. Paries ascomatis 15–20
μm crassus ad latus, ex cellulis 4–6-stratis 5–15 ×
2.5–4 μm compositus. Pseudoparaphyses septatae, ramificantes et
anastomosantes. Asci 85–110 × 10.5–13 μm, fissitunicati,
clavati vel cylindrici, octospori. Ascosporae 26.5–36.5 ×
4–6 μm, anguste fusiformes, 1-septatae, hyalinae, cum vagina
gelatinosa obtectae. Anamorphosis n class="Species">Tetraploa sensu stricto. Conidia in
vitro 25–37(–40) × 20–30 μm, brunnea, cum 4
appendicibus; appendices (52–)62–142(–150) μm longae,
3–8-septatae.
Ascomata 135–180 μm high, 150–250 μm diam,
scattered, immersed below the epidermis, n class="Chemical">subglobose, glabrous. Beak
short-papillate, ca. 50 μm high, 55–65 μm diam, central,
Ascomatal wall 15–20 μm thick at sides, composed of
4–6 layers of rectangular to polygonal hyaline to pale brown cells of
5–15 × 2.5–4 μm; at the base 10–20 μm thick.
Pseudoparaphyses cellular, numerous, 1.5–4 μm wide, septate,
branched, anastomosed. Asci 85–110 × 10.5–13 μm
(av. 99.3 × 11.8 μm, n = 20), fissitunicate, numerous, basal
and lateral, clavate to cylindrical, short-stalked (ca. 5–10
μm long), with 8 ascospores biseriate above and uniseriate below.
Ascospores 26.5–36.5 × 4–6 μm (av. 30.6 ×
4.5 μm, n = 31), L/W 5.1–8.3 (av. 6.9, n = 31),
narrowly fusiform, straight or slightly curved, with a nearly median
(0.47–0.51; av. 0.49, n = 30) septum and slightly constricted,
hyaline, smooth, with a mucilaginous sheath. Sheath 3–10 μm long at
the ends, 1–2 μm wide at the sides.
Culture characteristics: On RSA, both teleomorphic and anamorphic
states are produced. Ascospores are similar to those on the host,
measuring 29–37 × 4–5.5 μm (av. 32 × 4.7 μm,
n = 20). Anamorph is n class="Species">Tetraploa aristata s. l.
Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic.
Conidia produced directly on the mycelium, solitary, short
cylindrical, brown, verruculose, 25–37(–40) × 20–30
μm (av. 31.4 × 24.9 μm, n = 50), L/W 1.1–1.5 (av.
1.3, n = 50), 4-celled, composed of 4 columns and 4 setose
appendages. Appendages (52–)62–142(–150) μm long (av.
96.2 μm, n = 60), 2–3 μm wide at the apex, 7–8
μm at the base, with 3–8-septa at 8 to 16 μm intervals.
Specimen examined: Japan, Kagoshima, Isl. Yakushima, near
the mouth of Kurio-river, on culms of Arundo donax, 20 Oct. 2005, K.
Tanaka & T. Hosoya, HHUF29652 holotype designated here (isotype
TNS-F-12442), living culture KTC 1906 (=
CBS 125435).Notes: In terms of ascus and ascospore morphology, this species is
quite close to Tetraplosphaeria nagasakiensis, but it is distinct
from the latter in its conidial morphology. n class="Species">Tetraplosphaeria
yakushimensis and Tetraploa aristata
(CBS 996.70), both
collected from non-bamboo species (Arundo donax and Alpinia
formosa, respectively), clustered together (see phylogenetic section).
Morphological comparison of these two strains could not be made, because the
strain CBS 996.70
did not sporulate in any of the culture methods used. Sequence differences
between the strains (e.g. 24/459 nucleotides in ITS) also suggest
that they are different species.
sp. 1 (T. aristata s. l.).
Fig. 5A–D.
Fig. 5.
Tetraploa spp. A–D. Tetraploa sp. 1 (culture KT
1684); E–H. Tetraploa sp. 2 (HHUF 30027); A, E. Conidia on agar
piece immersed in water; B, F. Conidia; C, G. Conidial bodies; D, H. Colonies
on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A, E = 200 μm;
B–C, F–G = 20 μm; D, H = 1 cm.
Teleomorph: unknown.Conidia short cylindrical, brown, verruculose,
26–31.5(–35) × 17.5–24 μm (av. 29.4 × 20.8
μm, n = 20), L/W 1.2–1.9, 3–5-celled, with 4 setose
appendages of 100–175 μm long (av. 136.7 μm, n = 20).Specimen examined: Japan, Kagoshima, Nagayo, Nagasaki
Siebold University (129°52.4'E, 32°48.2'N), on culms of bamboo, 30 May
2004, K. Tanaka & S. Hatakeyama, HHUF 29625, living culture KTC
1684 (= JCM 14424).Notes: This species is most similar to anamorphs of
Tetraplosphaeria tetraploa and Tetraplosphaeria
yakushimensis, but has more slender conidia. The conidial morphologies of
these three species match well with the description of Tetraploa
aristata provided by Ellis
(1949), but they may not be
conspecific as discussed later.Tetraplosphaeria yakushimensis. A. Ascomata on host surface; B.
Ascoma in longitudinal section; C–F. Ascospores; G–H, Asci; I.
Ascus with an ocular chamber; J. Pseudoparaphyses; K. Conidia onn class="Chemical">agar piece
immersed in water; L. Conidia; M. Conidia with verruculose ornamentation; N.
Conidial body; O. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale
bars: A = 500 μm; B–E, I–J, M–N = 10 μm; F, L = 50
μm; G–H = 20 μm; K = 100 μm; O = 1 cm. A–J from HHUF
29652 holotype; K–O from culture KT 1906.
sp. 2 (T. ellisii s. l.).
Fig. 5E–H.Teleomorph: unknown.Conidia short cylindrical, broader at the base, brown,
verruculose, 38–50 × 22–33 μm (av. 43.1 × 27.9
μm, n = 20), L/W 1.3–1.8, 4–5-celled, with 4 setose
appendages of 142–330 μm long (av. 232 μm, n = 30).Specimen examined: Japan, Okinawa, Isl. Iriomote, near
Oomijya river, on culms of gramineae, 22 Nov. 2008, K. Tanaka & K.
Hirayama, HHUF 30027, living culture KTC 2578 (= NBRC 106251).Notes: This fungus has relatively large-sized conidia as compared
with those of other Tetraploa species examined in this study. It is
close to n class="Species">Tetraploa ellisii that was reported by Ellis
(1949) and the anamorph of
Tetraplosphaeria sasicola in terms of conidial dimension, but differs
from the latter in having longer appendages.
Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray., gen.
nov. MycoBank
MB515255.Anamorph: Undescribed Tetraploa-like state having conidia
with three setose appendages.Tetraploa spp. A–D. Tetraploa sp. 1 (culture KT
1684); E–H. Tetraploa sp. 2 (HHUF 30027); A, E. Conidia on agar
piece immersed in water; B, F. Conidia; C, G. Conidial bodies; D, H. Colonies
on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A, E = 200 μm;
B–C, F–G = 20 μm; D, H = 1 cm.Etymology: In reference to the anamorphic state of
Tetraploa-like conidia with three setose appendages.Ascomata immersa, subglobosa. Rostrum nullum vel breve. Pseudoparaphyses
septatae, ramificantes et anastomosantes. Asci fissitunicati, cylindrici vel
clavati, octospori. Ascosporae anguste fusiformes vel late fusiformis,
1-septatae, hyalinae vel pallide brunneae, cum vagina gelatinosa obtectae.
Anamorphosis n class="Species">Tetraploa sensu lato. Conidiophora absentia. Cellulae
conidiogenae monoblasticae. Conidia ovata vel obpyriformis, brunnea, cum 3
appendicibus.
Ascomata scattered to gregarious, immersed below the epidermis,
subglobose, with single locule, glabrous. Beak none to short, with
hyaline spn class="Disease">arse periphyses. Ascomatal wall rim-like at sides, composed
of vertically orientated rectangular to cylindrical hyaline hyphoid cells,
flattened and poorly developed at the base. Pseudoparaphyses narrowly
cellular, numerous, branched and anastomosed, septate. Asci
fissitunicate, basal and lateral, cylindrical to clavate, rounded at the apex,
short-stalked, with 8 ascospores. Ascospores narrowly fusiform to
broadly fusiform with rounded ends, 1-septate, constricted at the septum,
hyaline, smooth, with an entire sheath. Anamorph Tetraploa-like with
3 setose appendages. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous
cells monoblastic. Conidia composed of 3 columns with
pseudosepta, ovoid to obpyriform, brown, almost smooth, verrucose at the base,
with 3 setose appendages at the apex.
Type species: Triplosphaeria maxima Kaz. Tanaka & K.
Hiray., sp. nov.Notes: A new genus Triplosphaeria is introduced here to
place n class="Species">Massarina-like ascomycetes with Tetraploa-like
anamorphs having three setose appendages. The ascomata of
Triplosphaeria species are hemispherical with a flattened base and
have rim-like regions composed of vertically oriented hyphoid cells at the
side in longitudinal section. Morphology of anamorphs is superficially similar
to that of Tetraploa, but conidia are composed of three columns and
three setose appendages.
Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray., sp.
nov. MycoBank
MB515263.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Triplosphaeria acuta. A–B. Ascomata on host surface; C.
Ascospore in India ink; D–G. Ascospores; H. Ascoma in longitudinal
section; I. Ascomal wall at side; J. Asci; K. Pseudoparaphyses; L. Germinating
ascospore; M. Conidia on agar piece immersed in water; N–O. Conidia; P.
Conidial body; Q. Breached conidia composed of three columns; R. Colonies on
PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A–B = 500 μm;
C–G, P = 10 μm; H, M = 100 μm; I–L, N–O, Q = 20 μm;
R = 1 cm. A–L from HHUF 29387 holotype; M–R from culture KT
1170.
Etymology: In reference to the fusiform ascospores with acute
ends.Ascomata 135–230 × 540–750 μm, immersa, subglobosa.
Rostrum nullum vel breve, ostiolatum. Paries ascomatis 85–180 μm
crassus ad latus, ex cellulis 5–10 × 3.5–7.5 μm
compositus. Pseudoparaphyses 1–2 μm latae, ramificantes et
anastomosantes, septatae. Asci (62–)73–106 × 11–15
μm, fissitunicati, cylindrici vel clavati, octospori. Ascosporae
25–35 × 4–6(–7) μm, anguste fusiformes, 1-septatae,
hyalinae, strato mucoso 6–18 μm lato circumdatae. Anamorphosis
n class="Species">Tetraploa sensu lato. Conidia in vitro
(25–)31–50(–65) × 14–22 μm, brunnea, cum 3
appendicibus; appendices (37–)44–120(–130) μm longae,
3–8-septatae.
Ascomata 135–230 μm high, 540–750 μm diam
(including the rim), with single locule of 230–400 μm n class="Chemical">diam, scattered
to gregarious, immersed below the epidermis, subglobose, glabrous.
Beak none or short, with hyaline sparse periphyses, ostiolate, filled
with tips of pseudoparaphyses. Ascomatal wall at sides, 85–180
μm wide and rim-like, composed of vertically orientated rectangular to
subglobose hyaline hyphoid cells of 5–10 × 3.5–7.5 μm;
near the epidermis, 25–38 μm thick, composed of polygonal to
subglobose brown thick-walled cells of 3.5–10 μm diam; at the base
flattened and poorly developed. Pseudoparaphyses narrowly cellular,
numerous, 1–2 μm wide, guttulate, branched and anastomosed, septate,
with slime coating. Asci (62–)73–106 × 11–15
μm (av. 86.1 × 12.6 μm, n = 50), fissitunicate, numerous,
basal and somewhat lateral, cylindrical to clavate, rounded at the apex,
short-stalked (5–15 μm long), with 8 biseriate ascospores.
Ascospores 25–35 × 4–6(–7) μm (av. 29.6
× 5.5 μm, n = 126), L/W 4.8–6.2 (av. 5.5, n =
126), narrowly fusiform with acute ends, mostly curved, with a septum usually
submedian (0.49–0.53; av. 0.51, n = 113) and constricted,
hyaline, smooth, with an inconspicuous entire sheath of 6–18 μm
wide.
Triplosphaeria acuta. A–B. Ascomata on host surface; C.
Ascospore in n class="Chemical">India ink; D–G. Ascospores; H. Ascoma in longitudinal
section; I. Ascomal wall at side; J. Asci; K. Pseudoparaphyses; L. Germinating
ascospore; M. Conidia on agar piece immersed in water; N–O. Conidia; P.
Conidial body; Q. Breached conidia composed of three columns; R. Colonies on
PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A–B = 500 μm;
C–G, P = 10 μm; H, M = 100 μm; I–L, N–O, Q = 20 μm;
R = 1 cm. A–L from HHUF 29387 holotype; M–R from culture KT
1170.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 3–3.1 cm
n class="Chemical">diam, velvety in appearance, dark green (30F4) with greyish green (25D6)
entire margin (2 mm); reverse similar; no pigment produced. On RSA,
Tetraploa-like anamorph having 3 appendages is found.
Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic.
Conidia consist of one conidial body and 3 or rarely 4 appendages,
solitary. Conidial body (25–)31–50(–65) × 14–22
μm (av. 40.9 × 17.2 μm, n = 92), L/W = 1.8–3.3 (av.
2.4, n = 92), 3–4-pseudoseptate, pale brown, smooth, narrowly
ovate or ovate. Setose appendages (37–) 44–120(–130) μm
long (av. 90.3 μm, n = 70), 3–5 μm thick at the base,
2–3 μm at the apex, 3–8-septate, pale brown at the base and
almost hyaline apex, smooth, unbranched, straight.
Specimens examined: Japan, Hokkaido, Akkeshi, Ariake, Small
stream (144°52.0'E, 43°01.2'N), on submerged culms of bamboo (Sasa
nipponica?), 3 June 2003, K. Tanaka & S. Hatakeyama, HHUF 29387
holotype designated here, living culture KTC 1170 (= JCM 13171
= MAFF 239681); Hokkaido, Akkeshi, Ootakita, Sattebetsu-river (144°49.0'E,
43°08.1'N), on submerged culms of bamboo (Sasa nipponica?), 3
June 2003, K. Tanaka & S. Hatakeyama, KT 1218 = HHUF 29388.Note: This species is quite similar to Triplosphaeria
yezoensis in its overall morphology, but has more slender ascospores with
acute ends (L/W 5.5 vs. 4.4).Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray.,
nom. nov. MycoBank
MB515264.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Triplosphaeria cylindrica. A. Ascomata on host surface; B–E.
Ascospores; F. Ascoma in longitudinal section; G. Ascomal wall at side; H.
Pseudoparaphyses; I–J. Asci; K. Fissitunicate ascus with endoascus
extending from ectoascus; L. Ascospores in India ink; M–N. Developing
conidia; O. Conidial body; P–Q. Conidia; R. Breached conidium composed
of three columns; S. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark.
Scale bars: A = 500 μm; B–E, O, R = 10 μm; F = 50 μm;
G–L, N, P–Q = 20 μm; M = 100 μm; S = 1 cm. A–B, F, J
from YAM 21797 holotype of Massarina yezoensis; C–D, I from
HHUF 29626; E, G–H, K–L from HHUF 29381; M–R from culture KT
1256; S from culture KT 1800.
≡ Massarina yezoensis I. Hino & Katum., in Hino, Icon.
Fung. Bambus. Jpn.: 188. 1961.Ascomata 110–190 μm high, 450–1180 μm diam
(including the rim), with single locule of 220–350 μm n class="Chemical">diam,
scattered, immersed below the epidermis, subglobose, glabrous. Beak
none to short, with hyaline, sparse periphyses, filled with tips of
pseudoparaphyses. Ascomatal wall at sides, 100–350 μm wide
and rim-like, composed of vertically orientated rectangular to cylindrical
hyaline hyphoid cells of 5–15 × 2.5–5 μm; about 20 μm
thick near the epidermis, composed of polygonal brown thick-walled cells of
3–10 μm diam; at the base flattened and poorly developed.
Pseudoparaphyses narrowly cellular, numerous, 1–3 μm wide,
guttulate, branched and anastomosed, septate. Asci
(70–)80–126 × 14.5–21(–23.5) μm (av. 98.2
× 17.9 μm, n = 82), fissitunicate, numerous, basal and
lateral, cylindrical to clavate, rounded at the apex, short-stalked
(4–25 μm long), with 8 biseriate ascospores. Ascospores
(22–)25–31(–33) × 6–10 μm (av. 28.2 × 8
μm, n = 153), L/W 3.0–4.4 (av. 3.5, n = 153),
broadly fusiform to cylindrical with rounded ends, with a septum submedian
(0.50–0.56; av. 0.53, n = 143) and strongly constricted,
hyaline, smooth, with an entire sheath of 7–20 μm thick.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 3.1 cm n class="Chemical">diam,
velvety in appearance, brownish grey (6E2) with whitish entire margin of 2 mm;
reverse similar to surface; no pigment produced. On RSA, a
Tetraploa-like anamorph with 3 setose appendages is formed.
Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic.
Conidia consist of one conidial body and 3 long appendages, solitary.
Conidial body 29.5–40 × 14–23.5 μm (av. 36.1 × 19.4
μm, n = 20), L/W = 1.4–2.3 (av. 1.9, n = 20),
2–4-pseudoseptate, pale brown, smooth, narrowly ovate or ovate. Setose
appendages 33–120 μm long (av. 73.4 μm, n = 26),
4–4.5 μm thick at the base, 2–3 μm at the apex,
3–9-septate, pale brown at the base and almost hyaline apex, smooth,
unbranched, straight.
Specimens examined: Japan, Hokkaido, Oiwaki, on culms of
Sasa kurilensis, 16 Sept. 1956, I. Hino, YAM 21797 holotype of
n class="Species">Massarina yezoensis; Aomori, Souma, Jinba-dake (1049m a.s.l.), 14
June 2003, Y. Harada, HHUF 29381, living culture KTC 1256 (= JCM
13169 = MAFF 239679); Aomori, Mt. Iwaki, 9 July 2005, K. Tanaka, HHUF 29626,
living culture KTC 1800 (= JCM 14425); Hokkaido, Isl. Rishiri,
Afutoromanai trail, 25 July 2008, K. Tanaka & K. Hirayama, HHUF 30028,
living culture KTC 2550 (= NBRC 106247).
Notes: This species was originally described as Massarina
yezoensis (Hino 1961),
but is transferred to n class="Species">Triplosphaeria because of its hemispherical
ascomata with a flattened base and rim-like side wall. The most distinctive
feature of this species is the relatively wider ascospores (L/W 3.5) with
rounded ends. A new name is introduced for this species because the epithet
“yezoensis” has been applied for Triplosphaeria yezoensis
[= Didymella yezoensis (Hino
& Katumoto 1958)] in this study.
Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray., sp.
nov. MycoBank
MB515265.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Triplosphaeria maxima. A–B. Ascomata on host surface; C.
Ascospore in India ink; D–G. Ascospores; H. Ascoma in longitudinal
section; I. Ascomal wall at side; J–K. Asci; L. Apex of ascus; M.
Pseudoparaphyses; N. Conidia on agar piece immersed in water; O. Developing
conidia; P–Q. Conidia; R. Conidial body; S. Breached conidium composed
of three columns; T. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark.
Scale bars: A–B = 500 μm; C, I–K, P–Q, S = 20 μm;
D–G, L–M, R = 10 μm; H, N–O = 100 μm; T = 1 cm.
A–M from HHUF 29390 holotype; N–T from culture KT 870.
Etymology: In reference to the large-sized ascospores.Ascomata 250–300 × 900–1000 μm, immersa, globosa vel
subglobosa. Rostrum nullum vel breve, ostiolatum. Paries ascomatis
170–270 μm crassus ad latus, ex cellulis 5–13 ×
3.5–8 μm compositus. Pseudoparaphyses 1–2.5 μm latae,
ramificantes et anastomosantes, septatae. Asci 95–133 ×
14.5–21 μm, fissitunicati, clavati vel cylindrici, octospori.
Ascosporae (32.5–)34–45(–48.5) ×
(6–)7–9(–10) μm, anguste fusiformes, 1-septatae,
hyalinae, strato mucoso 3–7 μm lato circumdatae. Anamorphosis
n class="Species">Tetraploa sensu lato. Conidia in vitro 41–55 ×
17–23(–27.5) μm, brunnea, cum 3 appendicibus; appendices
12–66 μm longae, 1–6-septatae.
Ascomata 250–300 μm high, 900–1000 μm diam
(including the rim), with single locule of 420–530 μm n class="Chemical">diam, scattered
to sometimes clustered, immersed below the epidermis, globose to subglobose,
glabrous. Beak none or short, with hyaline sparse periphyses-like
hyphae, filled with pseudoparaphyses tips. Ascomatal wall at sides
170–270 μm wide and rim-like, composed of vertically orientated
rectangular to polygonal 5–13 × 3.5–8 μm hyaline cells;
near the epidermis composed of polygonal to subglobose brown cells of
3–10 μm diam; at the base flattened and poorly developed.
Pseudoparaphyses narrowly cellular, numerous, 1–2.5 μm wide,
guttulate, branched and anastomosed, with thin septa at 7 to 20 μm
intervals. Asci 95–133 × 14.5–21 μm (av. 113
× 18 μm, n = 50), fissitunicate, numerous, basal and
somewhat lateral, clavate to cylindrical, rounded at the apex, short-stalked
(7–25 μm long), with (4–)8 biseriate ascospores.
Ascospores (32.5–)34–45(–48.5) ×
(6–)7–9(–10) μm (av. 38.9 × 7.9 μm, n =
120), L/W 4.2–5.9 (av. 5.0, n = 120), narrowly fusiform with
acute ends, straight or slightly curved, 1-septate, submedian
(0.50–0.54; av. 0.52, n = 94), constricted at the septum,
hyaline, up to 4 guttules in each cell or without guttules, smooth, with an
inconspicuous sheath of 3–7 μm wide.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 2.6–2.8
cm n class="Chemical">diam, velvety in appearance, olive (2E4), with whitish entire margin of 2
mm; reverse dark green (29F6); no pigment produced. On RSA, a
Tetraploa-like anamorph with 3 setose appendages is formed.
Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic.
Conidia consist of a conidial body and 3 setose appendages, solitary.
Conidial body 41–55 × 17–23(–27.5) μm (av. 48.3
× 19.3 μm, n = 61), L/W = 2.2–3.2 (av. 2.5, n
= 61), 5–6-pseudoseptate, pale brown, smooth, narrowly ovate or ovate.
Appendages 12–66 μm long (av. 27.4 μm, n = 65), 3–4
μm wide, 1–6-septate, pale brown at the base and almost hyaline at
the apex, smooth, unbranched, slightly curved.
Specimen examined: Japan, Aomori, Nishimeya, Ookawa, on
culms of Sasa kurikensis, 23 July 2002, S. Hatakeyama, HHUF29330
holotype designated here, living culture KTC 870 (= JCM 13172
= MAFF 239682).Note: This fungus is clearly distinguishable from other species of
Triplosphaeria by its largest asci and ascospores.(I. Hino & Katum.) Kaz.
Tanaka, K. Hiray. & Shirouzu, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515266.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.
Triplosphaeria yezoensis. A. Ascomata on host surface; B–F.
Ascospores; G. Ascoma in longitudinal section; H. Ascospore in India ink; I.
Apex of ascus; J. Pseudoparaphyses; K–M. Asci; N. Conidia on rice straw
agar; O–P. Conidia; Q. Conidial body; R. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at
25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A = 500 μm; B–F, H–J, Q = 10
μm; G = 50 μm; K–M, O–P = 20 μm; N = 100 μm; R = 1 cm.
A–B, G, I–K from YAM 21758 holotype of Didymella
yezoensis; C–D, H, L from HHUF 30029; E–F, M from HHUF 30030;
N–O from culture KT 1732; P–R from culture KT 1715.
Basionym: Didymella yezoensis I. Hino & Katum., Bull.
Fac. Agr. Yamaguchi Univ. 9: 902. 1958.Ascomata 140–160 μm high, 450–550 μm diam
(including the rim), with single locule of 240–330 μm n class="Chemical">diam, scattered
to sometimes 2–3 grouped, immersed below the epidermis, subglobose,
glabrous. Beak none or short, with hyaline sparse periphyses.
Ascomatal wall at sides, 100–130 μm wide and rim-like,
composed of vertically orientated, rectangular to subglobose, hyaline to pale
brown, hyphoid cells of 5–15 × 5–7.5 μm; near the
epidermis composed of polygonal to subglobose brown thick-walled cells of
2.5–7.5 μm diam; at the base flattened and poorly developed.
Pseudoparaphyses narrowly cellular, numerous, 1–2 μm wide,
guttulate, branched and anastomosed, septate, with slime coating.
Asci (60–)72–119(–141) × 12–18.5 μm
(av. 93.3 × 15.3 μm, n = 86), fissitunicate, numerous, basal
and somewhat lateral, cylindrical to clavate, rounded at the apex,
short-stalked (5–24 μm long), with 8 biseriate ascospores.
Ascospores (22.5–)26–32(–35) × 5–8
μm (av. 29.1 × 6.6 μm, n = 109), L/W 3.6–5.3 (av.
4.4, n = 109), narrowly fusiform with acute ends, mostly curved, with
a septum usually submedian (0.50–0.55; av. 0.52, n = 109) and
constricted, hyaline, smooth, with an inconspicuous entire sheath of 2–8
μm thick.
Triplosphaeria cylindrica. A. Ascomata on host surface; B–E.
Ascospores; F. Ascoma in longitudinal section; G. Ascomal wall at side; H.
Pseudoparaphyses; I–J. Asci; K. Fissitunicate ascus with endoascus
extending from ectoascus; L. Ascospores in n class="Chemical">India ink; M–N. Developing
conidia; O. Conidial body; P–Q. Conidia; R. Breached conidium composed
of three columns; S. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark.
Scale bars: A = 500 μm; B–E, O, R = 10 μm; F = 50 μm;
G–L, N, P–Q = 20 μm; M = 100 μm; S = 1 cm. A–B, F, J
from YAM 21797 holotype of Massarina yezoensis; C–D, I from
HHUF 29626; E, G–H, K–L from HHUF 29381; M–R from culture KT
1256; S from culture KT 1800.
Triplosphaeria maxima. A–B. Ascomata on host surface; C.
Ascospore in India ink; D–G. Ascospores; H. Ascoma in longitudinal
section; I. Ascomal wall at side; J–K. Asci; L. Apex of ascus; M.
Pseudoparaphyses; N. Conidia on agar piece immersed in water; O. Developing
conidia; P–Q. Conidia; R. Conidial body; S. Breached conidium composed
of three columns; T. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark.
Scale bars: A–B = 500 μm; C, I–K, P–Q, S = 20 μm;
D–G, L–M, R = 10 μm; H, N–O = 100 μm; T = 1 cm.
A–M from HHUF 29390 holotype; N–T from culture KT 870.Triplosphaeria yezoensis. A. Ascomata on host surface; B–F.
Ascospores; G. Ascoma in longitudinal section; H. Ascospore in India ink; I.
Apex of ascus; J. Pseudoparaphyses; K–M. Asci; N. Conidia on rice straw
agar; O–P. Conidia; Q. Conidial body; R. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at
25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A = 500 μm; B–F, H–J, Q = 10
μm; G = 50 μm; K–M, O–P = 20 μm; N = 100 μm; R = 1 cm.
A–B, G, I–K from YAM 21758 holotype of Didymella
yezoensis; C–D, H, L from HHUF 30029; E–F, M from HHUF 30030;
N–O from culture KT 1732; P–R from culture KT 1715.Culture characteristics: On RSA, a n class="Species">Tetraploa-like
anamorph with 3 setose appendages is formed. Conidiophores absent.
Conidiogenous cells monoblastic. Conidia consist of a
conidial body and 3 setose appendages, solitary. Conidial body
30–40(–45) × (13–)15–22 μm (av. 34.4 ×
18 μm, n = 30), L/W = 1.7–2.2 (av. 1.9, n = 30),
3–4-pseudoseptate, pale brown, smooth, narrowly ovate or ovate.
Appendages (34–)40–75(–87) μm long (av. 51.6 μm,
n = 40), 2.5–3 μm at the apex, 3–4.5 μm wide at the
base, 2–9-septate, pale brown at the base and almost hyaline at the
apex, smooth, unbranched, slightly curved.
Triplosphaeria sp. A. Conidia on host surface; B. Conidia onagar
piece immersed in water; C–E. Conidia; F. Conidial body; G. Germinating
conidium; H. Breached conidium composed of three columns; I. Colonies on PDA
after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A–B = 200 μm;
C–F, H = 20 μm; G = 50 μm; I = 1 cm. A, D from HHUF 27481; B, F
from culture KT 2546; C, E, G–H from HHUF 30031; I from culture HC
4665.Specimens examined: Japan, Hokkaido, Asahikawa, Kagura, on
culms of Sasa palmata, 20 Sept. 1956, I. Hino, YAM 21758
holotype of n class="Species">Didymella yezoensis; Hokkaido, Yoichi, Sawamachi
(140°46'E, 43°11'N), 6 June 2004, K. Tanaka, HHUF 30029, living
culture KTC 1715 (=
CBS 125436);
Nagano, Sugadaira, Tsukuba Univ., on culms of Sasa sp., 28 June 2004,
T. Shirouzu, HHUF 30030, living culture KTC 1732 (=
CBS 125437).
Notes: Hino & Katumoto
(1958) described this fungus
as a species of Didymella, but the general characteristics of this
fungus do not fit within the current concept of n class="Species">Didymella
(Gruyter ,
Woudenberg ). Due to the presence of hemispherical ascomata having
rim-like side wall, and the morphology of the conidial state, it is
transferred to the genus Triplosphaeria. This species is close to
Triplosphaeria acuta, but differs from the latter in having
relatively broader ascospores (L/W 5.5 vs. 4.4 μm) and slightly smaller
conidia (av. 34.4 × 18 μm vs. 40.9 × 17.2 μm).
sp. (undescribed anamorphic state of
Triplosphaeria sp.) Fig.
10.
Fig. 10.
Triplosphaeria sp. A. Conidia on host surface; B. Conidia on agar
piece immersed in water; C–E. Conidia; F. Conidial body; G. Germinating
conidium; H. Breached conidium composed of three columns; I. Colonies on PDA
after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A–B = 200 μm;
C–F, H = 20 μm; G = 50 μm; I = 1 cm. A, D from HHUF 27481; B, F
from culture KT 2546; C, E, G–H from HHUF 30031; I from culture HC
4665.
Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic.
Conidia (26–)31.5–46 × 14–23 μm (av. 38.4
× 18 μm, n = 61), L/W 1.7–2.8 (av. 2.2, n =
61), brown, 3–5-pseudoseptate, with 3 setose appendages. Appendages
36–90 μm long (av. 54 μm, n = 86), 2–8-septate.Culture characteristics: Conidia produced on RSA are
considerably larger than those on the host, 52–85 × 17–31
μm (av. 67.3 × 23.6 μm, n = 13), L/W 1.9–3.7 (av.
2.9, n = 13), 6–8-pseudoseptate, having 3 appendages of
51–120(–160) μm long (av. 78.5 μm, n = 14) with
4–12 septa.Specimens examined: Japan, Aomori, Nakatsugaru, Nishimeya,
Oosawa tril, on culms of Sasa kurilensis, 22 July 2002, S.
Hatakeyama, HHUF 27481, living culture HC 4665 (= NBRC 106248);
Hokkaido, Isl. Rishiri, Kutugata trail, 25 July 2008, K. Tanaka & K.
Hirayama, HHUF 30031, living culture KTC 2546 (= NBRC 106249).Notes: The conidia of Triplosphaeria sp. on the host
plant (av. 38.4 × 18 μm) are similar to those of n class="Species">Triplosphaeria
maxima produced under culture conditions (av. 48.3 × 19.3 μm),
but Triplosphaeria sp. forms quite larger conidia in culture (av.
67.3 × 23.6 μm). The teleomorph of this fungus is unknown, but it
obviously belongs to Triplosphaeria based on the anamorph morphology
and molecular evidence. A new anamorph genus is needed to describe this
species formally. However, we retain this species as Triplosphaeria
sp. until further information is available, e.g. the possibility of
collecting a teleomorph for this species.
Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray., gen.
nov. MycoBank
MB515256.Anamorph: Undescribed Tetraploa-like state producing
conidia with three to eight setose appendages.Etymology: In reference to the anamorphic state producing conidia
with many setose appendages.Ascomata erumpentia vel superficialia, globosa. Rostrum aliquantum
papillatum. Pseudoparaphyses septatae, ramificantes et anastomosantes. Asci
fissitunicati, clavati, octospori. Ascosporae anguste fusiformes,
1(–3)-septatae, hyalinae vel pallide brunneae, cum vagina gelatinosa
obtectae. Anamorphosis Tetraploa sensu lato. Conidiophora absentia.
Cellulae conidiogenae monoblasticae. Conidia globosa vel subglobosa, brunnea,
cum 3–8 appendicibus.Ascomata scattered to clustered, erumpent to superficial, globose,
black to sometimes reddish-brown, with brown short hyphae at sides, mostly
associated with reddish pigment. Beak slightly papillate, central,
with hyaline periphyses. Ascomatal wall composed of rectangular to
polygonal brown cells, sometimes poorly developed at the base.
Pseudoparaphyses trabecular, numerous, tortuous, septate, branched
and anastomosed, associated with gelatinous material. Asci
fissitunicate, clavate, short-stalked, with 8 biseriate ascospores.
Ascospores narrowly fusiform, slightly curved, 1(–3)-septate,
constricted at the primary septum, hyaline to pale n class="Species">olive-brown, with an entire
sheath. Anamorphs Tetraploa-like with 3 to 8 setose appendages.
Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic,
Conidia globose to subglobose, with thin peel-like outer wall of
conidia, composed of numerous internal hyphae at the inside, brown, almost
smooth, verrucose at the base. Appendages brown, straight.
Type species: Polyplosphaeria fusca Kaz. Tanaka & K.
Hiray., sp. nov.Notes: The characteristics of this new genus include globose
ascomata surrounded by numerous brown hyphae, reddish pigment on the host
surface around ascomata, clavate asci with fissitunicate dehiscence, and
narrowly fusiform ascospores provided with an entire sheath. The anamorphic
state of Polyplosphaeria produces almost globose conidia composed of
numerous internal hyphae, thin peel-like outer wall, and three to eight setose
appendages. These appearances of conidia are slightly similar to those of
Piricauda (e.g. n class="Species">P. cochinensis and P. longispora),
but Piricauda has been defined primarily based on monotretic
conidiogenous cells and its muriform conidia
(Mercado Sierra ).
Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray., sp.
nov. MycoBank
MB515267.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 11.
Polyplosphaeria fusca. A. Ascomata on host surface; B–C.
Ascomata in longitudinal section; D–G. Ascospores; H. Ascospore in India
ink; I. Germinating ascospore; J–K. Asci; L. Ascomal wall; M.
Pseudoparaphyses; N. Conidia on rice straw agar; O–P. Conidia; Q.
Conidial body with peel-like wall; R. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C
in the dark. Scale bars: A = 1 000 μm; B, N = 200 μm; C–F, M = 10
μm; G–H, J–L, Q = 20 μm; I, O–P = 50 μm; R = 1 cm.
A–C, H–J, L from HHUF 29399 holotype; D, N, P, R from culture KT
1616; E from HHUF 29405; F–G, K, M from HHUF 30018; O from culture KT
1043; Q from culture KT 2124.
Etymology: From the Latin fuscus, in reference to the
coloured ascospores.Ascomata 180–420 × 300–680 μm, erumpentia vel
superficialia, globosa. Rostrum 50–90 × 75 μm, ostiolatum.
Paries ascomatis 20–50 μm crassus ad latus, ex cellulis
4–7-stratis 2.5–12.5 × 2.5–5 μm compositus.
Pseudoparaphyses 1–2 μm latae, septatae, ramificantes et
anastomosantes. Asci (84–) 92.5–135 × 17–23 μm,
fissitunicati, clavati, octospori. Ascosporae 36.5–49(–57) ×
7–10 μm, anguste fusiformes, 1(–3)-septatae, hyalinae vel
pallide brunneae, cum vagina gelatinosa obtectae. Anamorphosis
Tetraploa sensu lato. Conidia in vitro 43–100(–125) μm
n class="Chemical">diam, globosa vel subglobosa, brunnea, cum 3–8 appendicibus; appendices
92–200(–235) μm longae, 4–10-septatae.
Ascomata 180–420 μm high, 300–680 μm diam,
scattered to clustered, erumpent to superficial, globose, black to sometimes
reddish-brown, with short brown hyphae at sides, mostly associated with
reddish pigment. Beak 50–90 μm long, 75 μm n class="Chemical">diam, slightly
papillate, central, with hyaline periphyses, composed of subglobose to
polygonal slightly thickened cells of 2–5 μm diam. Ascomatal
wall at sides 20–50 μm thick, composed of 4–7 layers of
(irregular to paralell rows) rectangular to polygonal brown cells of
2.5–12.5 × 2.5–5 μm diam, sometimes poorly developed at
the base. Pseudoparaphyses trabecular, numerous, tortuous, 1–2
μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed, associated with gelatinous
material. Asci (84–) 92.5–135 × 17–23 μm
(av. 107.9 × 20.1 μm, n = 32), fissitunicate, clavate,
short-stalked (10–30 μm long), with 8 biseriate ascospores.
Ascospores 36.5–49(–57) × 7–10 μm (av.
43.8 × 8.4 μm, n = 111), L/W 4.5–5.8 (av. 5.2,
n = 111), narrowly fusiform, slightly curved, with a submedian
primary septum (0.49–0.53; av. 0.51, n = 106), constricted at
the primary septum, 1(–3)-septate, hyaline to pale olive-brown, with a
sheath up to 12 μm wide. At germination ascospores become 3- to 5-septate
and produce germ tubes from both end cells.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 1.9–2 cm
n class="Chemical">diam, velvety in appearance, dark green (28F8), with whitish entire margin of
2 mm; reverse raw-sienna (6D7); mellon (5A6) pigment produced. On RSA, a
Tetraploa-like anamorph with 3 to 8 setose appendages and a
teleomorph are observed. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous
cells monoblastic. Conidia 43–100(–125) μm diam
(av. 71.2 μm, n = 58), globose to subglobose, brown, almost
smooth, verrucose at the base. Appendages 92–200(–235) μm long
(av. 147.6 μm, n = 56), 7–10 μm wide at the base,
2–3.5 μm wide at the apex, with 4–10 septa at 15 to 28 μm
intervals. The teleomorph is similar to that found on the host, but the asci
and ascospores in culture are slightly larger. Asci 120–155 ×
17.5–23 μm (av. 135.4 × 20 μm, n = 56).
Ascospores 39–54(–57) × 8.5–10.5 μm (av.
47.7 × 9.6 μm, n = 70), L/W 4.3–5.7 (av. 5.0,
n = 70), with a submedian primary septum (0.50–0.53; av. 0.52
n = 69), 1–3-septate.
Specimens examined: Japan, Aomori, Sannohe, Gonohe, Asamizu
(141°18.0'E, 40°28.1'N), on culms of Pleioblastus chino, 2
Dec. 2003, K. Tanaka et al., HHUF 29399 holotype designated
here, living culture KTC 1616 (= JCM 13175 = MAFF 239685); Tochigi,
Kanuma, Simosawa (139°42.2'E, 36°34.4'N), on culms of
n class="Species">Phyllostachys bambusoides, 20 Mar. 2003, N. Asama, HHUF 29392, living
culture KTC 1043 (= JCM 13173 = MAFF 239683); Shizuoka, Syuntou,
Nagaizumi, Minami-isshiki, Fuji bamboo garden (138°53.1'N, 35°09.3'N),
on culms of Chimonobambusa marmorea, 8 Mar. 2004, K. Tanaka & Y.
Harada, HHUF 29405, living culture KTC 1640 (= JCM 13176 = MAFF
239686); Nagasaki, Nagayo, Nagasaki Siebold University (129°52.4'E,
32°48.2'N), on culms of bamboo, 30 May 2004, K. Tanaka & S.
Hatakeyama, HHUF 29406, living culture KTC 1686 (= JCM 13177 = MAFF
239687); Aomori, Souma, Ainai trail, on culms of Sasa kurilensis, 29
July 2006, K. Tanaka et al., HHUF 30018, living culture KTC
2124 (= CBS
125425).
Notes: This species has a broad host preference within
Bambusoideae because it has been associated with four bamboo genera
in two subtribes; Arundinariinae (Pleioblastus and
Sasa) and Shibataeinae (n class="Species">Chimonobambusa and
Phyllostachys). As discussed later, two distinct clades, KT1043+1640
and KT1616+2124, were found for this species in the tree. Ascomata in these
specimens are “almost superficial without associated pigmentation”
and “immersed to erumpent with reddish pigments”, respectively.
Possibly, they may reflect the differences between the bamboo hosts,
Arundinariinae and Shibataeinae. Additional material will be
helpful to evaluate the taxonomic significance of these variations.
Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray., gen.
nov. MycoBank
MB515257.Teleomorph: Unknown.Etymology: In reference to the Tetraploa-like conidial
morphology.Mycelia superficialia. Conidiophora absentia. Cellulae conidiogenae
monoblasticae. Conidia obpyriformes vel anguste obpyriformes, brunnea vel atro
brunnea, cum 4 (raro 6 vel 8) appendicibus.Mycelium superficial. Conidiophores absent.
Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, indistinguishable form creeping
hyphae. Conidia composed of 4 to 8 columns, obpyriform to long
obpyriform, brown to dark brown, almost smooth, verrucose at the base,
pseudoseptate, with setose appendages at the apical part. Appendages mostly 4,
rarely 6 to 8, curved or straight.Type species: Pseudotetraploa curviappendiculata (Sat.
Hatak., Kaz. Tanaka & Y. Harada) Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray., comb.
nov.Notes: An anamorphic genus Pseudotetraploa is established
for species with conidia similar to those of n class="Species">Tetraploa. The conidial
body of Pseudotetraploa is obpyriform to long obpyriform rather than
short cylindrical, and has pseudosepta rather than eusepta. In general, setose
appendages of Pseudotetraploa are short and curved, as compared with
those of Tetraploa (long and straight). There are several
hyphomycetes with conidia resembling those of Pseudotetraploa, such
as Ceratosporella (Kuthubutheen
& Nawawi 1991), Paratetraploa
(Wong ),
Triposporium (Rifai
1972), and Tretospeira
(Pirozynski 1972,
Ho ), but
they have macro- or semimacronematous conidiophores. Kodonospora
(Ando 1993) shares some
features with Pseudotetraploa, but this genus does not have
well-developed appendages. The following three species previously described as
Tetraploa (Hatakeyama ) are transferred to Pseudotetraploa.
Polyplosphaeria fusca. A. Ascomata on host surface; B–C.
Ascomata in longitudinal section; D–G. Ascospores; H. Ascospore in India
ink; I. Germinating ascospore; J–K. Asci; L. Ascomal wall; M.
Pseudoparaphyses; N. Conidia onn class="Species">rice straw agar; O–P. Conidia; Q.
Conidial body with peel-like wall; R. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C
in the dark. Scale bars: A = 1 000 μm; B, N = 200 μm; C–F, M = 10
μm; G–H, J–L, Q = 20 μm; I, O–P = 50 μm; R = 1 cm.
A–C, H–J, L from HHUF 29399 holotype; D, N, P, R from culture KT
1616; E from HHUF 29405; F–G, K, M from HHUF 30018; O from culture KT
1043; Q from culture KT 2124.
Pseudotetraploa spp. A–E. P. curviappendiculata;
F–J. P. longissima; K–O. P. javanica; A, F, K.
Conidia; B, G, L. Conidial bodies; C, H, M. Weakly breached conidia; D, I, N.
Strongly breached conidia (D, N. with four columns, I. with six columns); E,
J, O. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A, F, K
= 50 μm; B–D, G–I, L–N = 20 μm; E, J, O = 1 cm.
A–D from HHUF 28582 holotype; E from culture HC 4930; F–I from
HHUF 28580 holotype; J form culture HC 4933; K–N from HHUF 28596; O from
culture HC 4934.(Sat. Hatak., Kaz.
Tanaka & Y. Harada) Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray., comb. nov.
MycoBank MB515268.
Fig. 12A–E.
Fig. 12.
Pseudotetraploa spp. A–E. P. curviappendiculata;
F–J. P. longissima; K–O. P. javanica; A, F, K.
Conidia; B, G, L. Conidial bodies; C, H, M. Weakly breached conidia; D, I, N.
Strongly breached conidia (D, N. with four columns, I. with six columns); E,
J, O. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A, F, K
= 50 μm; B–D, G–I, L–N = 20 μm; E, J, O = 1 cm.
A–D from HHUF 28582 holotype; E from culture HC 4930; F–I from
HHUF 28580 holotype; J form culture HC 4933; K–N from HHUF 28596; O from
culture HC 4934.
Basionym: Tetraploa curviappendiculata Sat. Hatak., Kaz.
Tanaka & Y. Harada, Mycoscience 46: 196. 2005.Specimens examined: Japan, Aomori, Hirosaki, Mt. Kudoji
(140°25'E, 40°31'N), on culms of Sasa kurilensis, 9 May 2003,
Y. Harada, HHUF 28582 holotype, living culture HC 4930 (= JCM
12852 = MAFF 239495); Aomori, Hirosaki, Matsukitai (140°29'E,
40°33'N), on culms of n class="Species">Sasa kurilensis, 7 Dec. 2003, K. Tanaka
& N. Asama, HHUF 28590, living culture HC 4932 (= MAFF 239496);
Hokkaido, Isl. Rishiri, Shinrin-park, on culms of Sasa kurilensis, 25
July 2008, K. Tanaka & K. Hirayama, HHUF 30019, living culture KTC
2558 (= CBS
125426 = NBRC 106241).
(Sat. Hatak., Kaz. Tanaka &
Y. Harada) Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray., comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515270.
Fig. 12F–J.Basionym: Tetraploa longissima Sat. Hatak., Kaz. Tanaka
& Y. Harada, Mycoscience 46: 198. 2005.Specimen examined: Japan. Aomori, Sannohe, Gonohe, Asamizu
(141°18.0'E, 40°28.1'N), on culms of Pleioblastus chino, 2
Dec. 2003, K. Tanaka et al., HHUF 28580 holotype, living
culture HC 4933 (= JCM 12853 = MAFF 239497).(Rifai, Zainuddin & Cholil)
Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray., comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515269.
Fig. 12K–O.Basionym: Tetraploa javanica Rifai, Zainuddin &
Cholil, Reinwardtia 10: 420. 1988.Specimen examined: Japan, Aomori, Sannohe, Gonohe, Asamizu
(141°18.0'E, 40°28.1'N), on culms of Pleioblastus chino, 2
Dec. 2003, K. Tanaka et al., HHUF 28596, living culture HC
4934 (= JCM 12854 = MAFF 239498).Quadricrura bicornis. A. Conidia on host surface; B–F.
Conidia; G. Base of conidium with warty surface; H. Conidial body with
peel-like wall; I. Breached conidium with internal hyphal structure; J.
Colonies onPDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A = 200
μm; B–H = 10 μm; I = 20 μm; J = 1 cm. A–F, H–I from
HHUF 30023 holotype; G, J from culture (yone 153).Kaz. Tanaka, K. Hiray. & Sat. Hatak.,
gen. nov. MycoBank
MB515258.Teleomorph: Unknown.Etymology: From Latin quadri meaning four and
crura meaning leg, in reference to the conidial morphology with four
leg-like short appendages.Mycelia superficialia. Conidiophora absentia. Cellulae conidiogenae
monoblasticae. Conidia globosa vel subglobosa, brunnea vel atro brunnea, cum 1
vel 2 longiappendicibus et 4 vel 5 breviappendicibus.Mycelium superficial. Conidiophores absent.
Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, indistinguishable form creeping
hyphae. Conidia globose to n class="Chemical">subglobose, with thin peel on the outer
wall of conidia, composed of numerous internal hyphae at the inside, solitary,
brown to dark brown, verrucose at the base, with setose appendages. Appendages
of two forms, unbranched, smooth, brown at the base and almost hyaline at the
apex: long appendages usually single or 2, arising from apical part of
conidia; short appendages mostly 4 to 5, arising from basal side part of
conidia.
Type species: Quadricrura septentrionalis Kaz. Tanaka, K.
Hiray. & Sat. Hatak.Notes: This new genus is characterised by globose to subglobose
conidia that are composed of internal hyphae and thin peel-like outer wall
similar to the n class="Species">Polyplosphaeria anamorph. The presence of internal
hyphae in conidia is known in the genus Piricaudilium
(Holubová-Jechová
1988). Likewise, the peel-like outer wall of conidia is found in
the genus Megacapitula (Chen
& Tzean 1993). Quadricrura, however, differs from
these genera in the morphology of setose appendages of conidia; one or two
long appendages arising from the apical part and mostly four to five short
appendages around the basal sides. Bioconiosporium
(Ellis 1976,
Narayan & Kamal 1986) and
Pseudopetrakia (Ellis
1976) have conidia resembling those of Quadricrura to
some degree, but produce setose appendages only on the apex of muriform
conidia.
Kaz. Tanaka, K. Hiray. & H.
Yonez., sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515271.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 13.
Quadricrura bicornis. A. Conidia on host surface; B–F.
Conidia; G. Base of conidium with warty surface; H. Conidial body with
peel-like wall; I. Breached conidium with internal hyphal structure; J.
Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A = 200
μm; B–H = 10 μm; I = 20 μm; J = 1 cm. A–F, H–I from
HHUF 30023 holotype; G, J from culture (yone 153).
Etymology: From Latin bi meaning two and cornis
meaning horned, referring to the two long setose appendages of conidia.Quadricrura meridionalis. A. Conidia on host surface; B. Conidia
onrice straw agar; C. Germinating conidium; D–G. Conidia; H. Base of
conidium with warty surface; I. Conidial body; J. Colonies on PDA after 45 d
at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A–B = 200 μm; C–G, I = 50
μm; H = 20 μm; J = 1 cm. A, C–H from HHUF 30024 holotype; B,
I–J from culture KT 2607.Mycelia superficialia. Conidiophora absentia. Cellulae conidiogenae
monoblasticae. Conidia 32.5–60 × 40–65 μm, subglobosa,
brunnea vel atro brunnea, cum appendicibus; longiappendices 2,
65–175(–200) μm longae, 10–13-septatae; breviappendices
4, 17.5–45.5 μm longae, 0–2-septatae.Mycelium superficial. Conidiophores absent.
Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, indistinguishable form creeping
hyphae. Conidia 32.5–60 × 40–65 μm (av. 40.6
× 48.8 μm, n = 32), subglobose, solitary, brown to dark
brown, verrucose at the base, with setose appendages. Appendages of two forms,
unbranched, smooth, brown at the base and almost hyaline at the apex: long
appendages 2, 65–175(–200) μm long (av. 130.6 μm, n
= 36), 10–13 μm wide at the base, 4–5 μm wide at the apex,
4–8-septate, arising from apical part of conidia; short appendages
usually 4, 17.5–45.5 μm long (av. 30.6 μm, n = 39),
7–11.5 μm wide at the base, 4–5 μm wide at the apex,
0–2-septate, arising excentric from the conidial base.Culture characteristics: The conidial state in culture conidition
is similar to that on the host, but the conidia are slightly larger
(50–77.5 × 60–80 μm).Specimens examined: Japan, Aomori, Shirakami, Chisan-dam,
on leaf litter of a conifer, 21 July 2007, H. Yonezawa & K. Tanaka, HHUF
30023 holotype designated here, living culture yone 153 (=
CBS 125427);
Aomori, Shirakami, Chisan-dam, on culms of n class="Species">Sasa kurilensis, 21 July
2007, H. Yonezawa & K. Tanaka, yone154 = HHUF 30035.
Notes: One of the most striking features of Q. bicornis
is the presence of two pairs of long appendages at the conidial apex. The
holotype of this fungus was collected from leaf litter of a conifer, but it is
uncertain whether the conifer is a natural host of n class="Species">Q. bicornis. An
additional specimen of this fungus on Sasa kurilensis (HHUF 30035)
was also identified as Q. bicornis based on morphology, although
there is no isolate and molecular evidence from this specimen. These two
specimens were collected from the same locality, and the holotype was found
around the base of a thicket of Sasa kurilensis.
Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hiray.,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515273.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 14.
Quadricrura meridionalis. A. Conidia on host surface; B. Conidia
on rice straw agar; C. Germinating conidium; D–G. Conidia; H. Base of
conidium with warty surface; I. Conidial body; J. Colonies on PDA after 45 d
at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars: A–B = 200 μm; C–G, I = 50
μm; H = 20 μm; J = 1 cm. A, C–H from HHUF 30024 holotype; B,
I–J from culture KT 2607.
Etymology: In reference to the southern distribution of the
taxon.Mycelia superficialia. Conidiophora absentia. Cellulae conidiogenae
monoblasticae. Conidia 36–43.5(–56.5) × 41–75 μm,
subglobosa, brunnea vel atro brunnea, cum appendicibus; longiappendices 1 vel
2, 170–295 μm longae, 10–16-septatae; breviappendices 4 vel 5,
15–37.5 μm longae, 0–2-septatae.Mycelium superficial. Conidiophores absent.
Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, indistinguishable from creeping
hyphae. Conidia 36–43.5(–56.5) × 41–75 μm
(av. 48.8 × 57.5 μm, n = 22), subglobose, solitary, brown to
dark brown, verrucose at the base, with setose appendages. Appendages of two
forms, unbranched, smooth, brown at the base and almost hyaline at the apex:
long appendages usually single, rarely 2, 170–295 μm long (av. 236.3
μm, n = 15), 10–12 μm wide at the base, 3–4 μm
wide at the apex, with 10 to 16 septa n class="Species">at 7.5 to 30 μm intervals, arising
from the apical part of conidia; short appendages usually 4, rarely 5,
15–37.5 μm long (av. 24.9 μm, n = 27), 6–7 μm
wide at the base, 3–4 μm wide at the apex, 0–2-septate, arising
excentric from the conidial base.
Quadricrura septentrionalis. A. Conidia on host surface; B.
Conidia onagar piece immersed in water; C–F. Conidia; G. Conidial body
composed of internal hyphoid structure; H. Spermogonia on rice straw agar; I.
Spermatia; J. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars:
A–B = 200 μm; C–F = 50 μm; G, I = 10 μm; H = 500 μm; J
= 1 cm. A, C from HHUF 30021; B, F–J from culture HC 4984; D–E
from HHUF 28782 holotype.Culture characteristics: On RSA, sporulation is obn class="Chemical">served on the
surface of rice straw, but the conidial morphology is considerably different
as compared with those on the host. The conidial body is larger, measuring
90–100 × 95–112 μm, and with 3–6 long
appendages.
Specimen examined: Japan, Okinawa, Isl. Yonaguni, Irinda
trail, on culms of bamboo, 23 Nov. 2008, K. Tanaka & K. Hirayama, HHUF
30024 holotype designated here, living culture KTC 2607 (NBRC
106242 = CBS
125684).Note: It bears a slight resemblance to Q.
septentrionalis, but can be separated on the basis of larger and
subglobose conidia (av. 48.8 × 57.5 μm vs. 37.4 μm diam).Kaz. Tanaka, K. Hiray. &
Sat. Hatak., sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515272.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 15.
Quadricrura septentrionalis. A. Conidia on host surface; B.
Conidia on agar piece immersed in water; C–F. Conidia; G. Conidial body
composed of internal hyphoid structure; H. Spermogonia on rice straw agar; I.
Spermatia; J. Colonies on PDA after 45 d at 25 °C in the dark. Scale bars:
A–B = 200 μm; C–F = 50 μm; G, I = 10 μm; H = 500 μm; J
= 1 cm. A, C from HHUF 30021; B, F–J from culture HC 4984; D–E
from HHUF 28782 holotype.
Etymology: In reference to the northern distribution of the
taxon.Mycelia superficialia. Conidiophora absentia. Cellulae conidiogenae
monoblasticae. Conidia 30–45(–52.5) μm, globosa, brunnea vel
atro brunnea, cum appendicibus; longiappendices unica, 115–210 μm
longae, 6–12-septatae; breviappendices 4, 10–20 μm longae,
0–1-septatae.Mycelium superficial. Conidiophores absent.
Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, indistinguishable form creeping
hyphae. Conidia 30–45(–52.5) μm (av. 37.4 μm,
n = 50) diam, globose, solitary, brown to dark brown, verrucose at
the base, with setose appendages. Appendages two forms, unbranched, smooth,
brown at the base and almost hyaline at the apex: long appendage single,
115–210 μm long (av. 159.7 μm, n = 50), 5–6 μm
wide at the base, 3–4 μm wide at the apex, 6–12-septate,
arising from apical part of conidia; short appendages usually 4, 10–20
μm long (av. 14.7 μm, n = 50), 3–4 μm wide at the base
and apex, 0–1-septate, arising excentric from the conidial base.Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining a n class="Chemical">diam of
2.9–3.2 cm, velvety in appearance, metal-grey (5E2) with 2 mm whitish
entire margin; reverse clay (5D5); no pigment produced. On RSA, an anamorphic
state is formed on the surface of rice straw. Conidia from culture
are similar to those on natural specimen, but conidial body is slightly
smaller (25–42.5 μm diam) and long appendage is longer (135–240
μm). In the culture HC 4984, a spermatial state is also produced;
Spermogonia 80–150 μm, globose, black; Spermatia
2–2.5 × 1.5 μm, subglobose, hyaline.
Specimens examined: Japan, Aomori, Hirosaki, Serisawa-park,
on culms of n class="Species">Sasa kurilensis, 3 May 2003, K. Tanaka & N. Asama,
HHUF 28782 holotype designated here, living culture HC 4984 (=
CBS 125430);
Aomori, Shimokita, Hotokegaura, on culms of S. kurilensis, 20 Oct.
2002, N. Asama, HHUF 30020, living culture KTC 920 (=
CBS 125428);
Aomori, Hirosaki, Serisawa-park, on culms of S. kurilensis, 7 Dec.
2002, K. Tanaka & N. Asama, HHUF 28781, living culture HC 4983 (=
CBS 125429);
Aomori, Zatoishi, Ogamisawa, on culms of S. kurilensis, 8 July 2006,
K. Tanaka, HHUF 29747, living culture yone 44 = HC 5254 (=
CBS 125431);
Hokkaido, Isl. Rishiri, Kutsugata tail, on culms of S. kurilensis, 28
July 2007, K. Tanaka & G. Sato, HHUF 30021, living culture yone
176 (= CBS
125432 = NBRC 106243); Hokkaido, Isl. Rishiri, Oniwaki trail, on
culms of S. kurilensis, 29 July 2007, K. Tanaka & G. Sato, living
culture yone 179 (=
CBS 125433 = NBRC
106244); Aomori, Hirosaki, Serisawa-park, on culms of S. kurilensis,
29 Nov. 2003, K. Tanaka & N. Asama, SH 91 = HHUF 28788; Iwate, Nishine,
Mt. Iwate, on culms of S. kurilensis, 19 Oct. 2003, K. Tanaka, SH 89
= HHUF 28786; Aomori, Hirosaki, Zatoishi, on culms of S. kurilensis,
8 Nov. 2003, K. Tanaka & T. Shirouzu, SH 35 = HHUF 28787; Hokkaido,
Yoichi, Sawamachi (140°46'E, 43°11'N), on culms of S.
kurilensis, 6 June 2004, K. Tanaka, SH 193 = HHUF 28790; Hokkaido,
Sapporo, Maruyama (141°18.4'E, 43°02.4'N), on culms of S.
kurilensis, 6 June 2004, K. Tanaka, SH 195 = HHUF 28792; Hokkaido,
Sapporo, Botanical garden of Hokkaido Univ. (141°20.4'E, 43°03.4'N),
on culms of Sasamorpha borealis var. borealis, 6 June 2004,
K. Tanaka, SH 194 = HHUF 28791; Hokkaido, Notsuke, Bekkai, Notsukefuren park
(145°14'E, 43°31'N), on culms of Sasa niopponica, 8 Sept.
2003, K. Tanaka & S. Hatakeyama, SH 118 = HHUF 28783; Hokkaido, Akkeshi,
Ootakita, Sattebetu-river (144°49.0'E, 43°08.1'N), on bamboo culms, 7
Sept. 2003, K. Tanaka & S. Hatakeyama, SH 88 = HHUF 28784; Hokkaido,
Kamikawa, Shintoku, Shinnai, Karikachi mountain pass (142°46.1'E,
43°07.6'N, 644m a.s.l.), on bamboo culms, 9 Sept. 2003, K. Tanaka & S.
Hatakeyama, SH 92 = HHUF 28785; Aomori, Towada, Denbouzi (141°16.1'E,
40°34.2'N), on culms of Pleioblastus chino, 2 Dec. 2003, K.
Tanaka et al., SH 87 = HHUF 28789.
Note: Quadricrura septentrionalis is frequently collected
from various bamboos, particularly Sasa kurilensis, and might be
widely distributed in northern Japan.SSU+LSU: Approximately 990–1 350 bp of SSU and 1 260–1
290 bp of LSU nrDNA sequences were determined for 53 isolates of bamboo fungi.
A combined dataset of SSU (893 bp) and LSU (985 bp) sequences were generated
after excluding insertions of several species which correspond to positions
471–832 of n class="Species">Roussoellopsis tosaensis (GenBank AB524484) and
positions 1 247–1 591 of Neottiosporina paspali (GenBank
EU754073) in the SSU sequences. The combined dataset was aligned with
sequences of 39 species belonging to Dothideomycetes (mainly
Pleosporales) obtained from GenBank. Botryosphaeria dothidea,
Spencermartinsia viticola (both belonging to Botryosphaeriales)
and Dothidea insculpta (Dothideales) were used as the
outgroup taxa. Of the 1 878 characters, 442 (23.5 %) were variable, of which
349 (18.6 %) were parsimony informative. An MP analysis yielded 31 equally
most parsimonious trees with a tree length (TL) of 1 503 steps [consistency
index (CI), retention index (RI) of 0.403 and 0.777, respectively]. A
consensus tree was constructed from the 31 MP trees
(Fig. 16). The trees obtained
from NJ and Bayesian analysis had a similar topology to that of the MP tree on
the whole, although the monophyly of Triplosphaeria was rejected in
the Bayesian analysis. Bambusicolous fungi represented by 53 isolates
comprising 32 species in 14 genera are scattered in nine clades. The new
family Tetraplosphaeriaceae formed a monophyletic clade moderately or
strongly supported by NJBS value (86 %) or Bayesian PP (1.00), but the
monophyly was not well supported in MP analysis (54 %).
Tetraplosphaeriaceae was positioned as a sister group to a clade
composed of mainly pleosporalean families, such as Lophiostomataceae,
Massarinaceae, Phaeosphaeriaceae, Pleomassariaceae and
Pleosporaceae, but these relationships were not supported in the MP
analysis (< 50 %) and not found in the Bayesian analysis. In the NJ
analysis, Tetraplosphaeriaceae clustered with the Massarina
arundinariae-Testudinaceae clade.
Fig. 16.
Consensus tree of the 31 equally most parsimonious trees based on a
combined dataset of SSU (893 bp) and LSU (985 bp) nrDNA sequences. MP and NJ
bootstrap support greater than 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities above
0.90 are indicated at the nodes as MPBS/NJBS/PP. Hyphen (“-”)
indicates a value lower than 50 % (BS) Fig. 16 or 0.90 (PP), and a node not
present in an analysis is shown with “x”. A small red circle is
used for a clade with high statistical support (more than 90 % BS and 1.00
PP). The green branches represent lineages of bambusicolous fungi. TL = 1 503,
CI = 0.403, RI = 0.777. Either two GenBank numbers (SSU+LSU) or the original
isolate numbers are noted after the species names. An asterisk
(“*”) indicates sequences obtained from two different strains of
the same species. The tree was rooted to Botryosphaeria dothidea,
Spencermartinsia viticola and Dothidea insculpta. Species of
bambusicolous fungi are indicated in bold
ITS+TEF+BT: From 31 isolates of
n class="Species">Tetraplosphaeriaceae species including the outgroup taxon
(Massarina arundinariae), sequences of ca. 482–503 bp,
293–333 bp, 570–662 bp were obtained for the ITS, TEF and BT
regions. The final alignment of the ITS region after eliminating gaps and
ambiguous sites was composed of 459 bp. These included 131 variable sites
(28.5 %) and 106 parsimony informative sites (23.1 %). The NJ tree using this
alignment rejected the monophyly of Quadricrura and
Triplosphaeria. In this analysis, the other three genera,
Polyplosphaeria, Pseudotetraploa and Tetraplosphaeria, were
supported with moderate or strong BS values (71–100 %;
Fig. 17A). The data matrix of
TEF comprised of 281 aligned characters with 157 variable positions (55.9 %)
and 141 parsimony-informative positions (50.2 %). Although the NJ tree
generated from this dataset indicated that the four genera,
Polyplosphaeria, Pseudotetraploa, Quadricrura and
Triplosphaeria, form monophyletic clades, respectively (79–100
%), Tetraplosphaeria was separated into two clades
(Fig. 17B). A dataset from BT
sequences included 553 sites after truncating both ends and excluding
ambiguous regions. Of these, 248 (44.8 %) and 228 (41.2 %) were variable and
parsimony informative, respectively. The NJ tree based on this alignment
showed five genera each in Tetraplosphaeriaceae as monophyletic
clades. However, the BS value of Quadricrura was relatively low (67
%) and relationships between the genera were poorly resolved from the BT tree
alone (Fig. 17C).
Fig. 17.
Neighbour-joining trees of the Tetraplosphaeriaceae based on the
sequences from ITS (A: 459 bp), TEF (B: 281 bp), and BT (C: 553 bp). Bootstrap
support greater than 50 % are shown at the nodes. An original isolate number
is noted after the species name. The tree is rooted to Massarina
arundinariae.
In addition to the individual datasets of ITS, TEF and BT, a combined
alignment of these regions (1 293 bp) was used for further analyses. The
phylogenetic tree obtained from the Bayesian analysis is shown in
Fig. 18. It was generally
similar to the results form the individual analyses
(Fig. 17) in terms of the
arrangement of each genus. Other trees generated from MP and NJ analyses had
essentially similar topologies, but monophyly of n class="Species">Tetraplosphaeria was
rejected in the MP tree. Each genus was supported by strong statistical values
of more than 96 % BS or 1.00 PP, except for the Tetraplosphaeria
clade. Quadricrura and Polyplosphaeria together formed a
well-supported single clade (1.00 PP and > 87 % BS), which was a sister
group to Triplosphaeria, and the relationships of these three genera
received strong support (1.00 PP and > 99 % BS). Pseudotetraploa
was a sister taxon of the Quadricrura-Polyplosphaeria-Triplosphaeria
clade. Tetraplosphaeria occurred at the most basal position in this
family.
Fig. 18.
Phylogeny of Tetraplosphaeriaceae from Bayesian analysis based on
a combined dataset (1 293 bp) of ITS, TEF, and BT. Bayesian posterior
probabilities above 0.90 and MP and NJ bootstrap values greater than 50 % are
indicated at the nodes as PP/MPBS/NJBS. Hyphen (“-”) indicates
values lower than 0.90 (PP) or 50 % (BS), and a node not present in an
analysis is shown with “x”. A small red circle is used for a clade
with high statistical support (more than 1.00 PP and 90 % BS). An original
isolate number is noted after the species name. The tree was rooted to
Massarina arundinariae. a) Abbreviations for species
characterisation: Hos = host, B: bamboo, O: other plant; Con
= conidial structure, int: with internal hyphae, col: with columns;
Ape = number of conidial appendages, 1+4 or 2+4 indicates number of
apical appendages + basal appendages; Fig. 18 Tel = teleomorph
formation, +: present, -: absent,?: unknown; Mat = mating type, Ho:
homothallic, He: heterothallic,?: unknown.
Consensus tree of the 31 equally most parsimonious trees based on a
combined dataset of SSU (893 bp) and LSU (985 bp) nrDNA sequences. MP and NJ
bootstrap support greater than 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities above
0.90 are indicated at the nodes as n class="Chemical">MPBS/NJBS/PP. Hyphen (“-”)
indicates a value lower than 50 % (BS) Fig. 16 or 0.90 (PP), and a node not
present in an analysis is shown with “x”. A small red circle is
used for a clade with high statistical support (more than 90 % BS and 1.00
PP). The green branches represent lineages of bambusicolous fungi. TL = 1 503,
CI = 0.403, RI = 0.777. Either two GenBank numbers (SSU+LSU) or the original
isolate numbers are noted after the species names. An asterisk
(“*”) indicates sequences obtained from two different strains of
the same species. The tree was rooted to Botryosphaeria dothidea,
Spencermartinsia viticola and Dothidea insculpta. Species of
bambusicolous fungi are indicated in bold
Neighbour-joining trees of the Tetraplosphaeriaceae based on the
sequences from ITS (A: 459 bp), n class="Gene">TEF (B: 281 bp), and BT (C: 553 bp). Bootstrap
support greater than 50 % are shown at the nodes. An original isolate number
is noted after the species name. The tree is rooted to Massarina
arundinariae.
Phylogeny of Tetraplosphaeriaceae from Bayesian analysis based on
a combined dataset (1 293 bp) of ITS, n class="Gene">TEF, and BT. Bayesian posterior
probabilities above 0.90 and MP and NJ bootstrap values greater than 50 % are
indicated at the nodes as PP/MPBS/NJBS. Hyphen (“-”) indicates
values lower than 0.90 (PP) or 50 % (BS), and a node not present in an
analysis is shown with “x”. A small red circle is used for a clade
with high statistical support (more than 1.00 PP and 90 % BS). An original
isolate number is noted after the species name. The tree was rooted to
Massarina arundinariae. a) Abbreviations for species
characterisation: Hos = host, B: bamboo, O: other plant; Con
= conidial structure, int: with internal hyphae, col: with columns;
Ape = number of conidial appendages, 1+4 or 2+4 indicates number of
apical appendages + basal appendages; Fig. 18 Tel = teleomorph
formation, +: present, -: absent,?: unknown; Mat = mating type, Ho:
homothallic, He: heterothallic,?: unknown.
DISCUSSION
Phylogenetic position of selected bambusicolous fungi
In this study, phylogenetic analyses of bambusicolous fungi were carried
out based on SSU+LSU sequences. Fifty-three isolates from bamboo comprising 32
species in 14 genera were found to cluster in nine clades. Notes on
phylogenetic placements of species in the following nine genera except for
members in Tetraplosphaeriaceae are described below.Astrosphaeriella (Fig.
19A–B): This genus is characterised by the cone-shaped,
large ascomata composed of carbonaceous firm peridium, with starlike flanges
of ruptured host tissue around the base
(Fig. 19A); the numerous
trabeculate pseudoparaphyses in gel matrix; the bitunicate cylindrical-clavate
asci; and the narrowly fusiform ascospores
(Barr 1990,
Hyde & Fröhlich 1998,
Fröhlich & Hyde
2000). Currently, 47 taxa are accepted in
n class="Species">Astrosphaeriella (Wang , Jagadeesh Ram
, Tanaka
& Harada 2005a, Chen &
Huang 2006), and most of them are recorded on bamboo.
Astrosphaeriella has been provisionally placed in
Melanommataceae, Pleosporales
(Lumbsch & Huhndorf 2007),
although the molecular phylogeny of this genus has not been revealed to date.
The result from our study (Fig.
16) suggests that Astrosphaeriella is not a member of
Melanommataceae, because Astrosphaeriella stellata, the type
of the genus, deviated from Herpotrichia juniperi, a representative
species of the Melanommataceae
(Zhang ),
and was located at the basal position of Pleosporales. Monophyly of
Astrosphaeriella was not supported. Tanaka & Harada
(2005a) transferred
Melanopsamma aggregata (Hino
& Katumoto 1955) to Astrosphaeriella according to the
broad generic concept of Astrosphaeriella proposed by Hyde et
al. (2000) to accept
Massarina-like species having a slit-like ostiole at the ascomata.
However, this classification was not supported by our results, because A.
aggregata with a slit-like ostiole
(Fig. 19B) did not form a
clade with A. stellata (Fig.
16). Chen & Hsieh
(2004) recognised three
elements in this genus: 1) typical Astrosphaeriella species (e.g.
A. stellata), 2) Trematosphaeria-like species with striate
ascospores (e.g. A. africana), and 3) Massarina-like species
with immersed ascomata (e.g. A. bakeriana); they proposed a strict
generic concept excluding Massarina-like species. The phylogeny
obtained from our study support their opinion.
Fig. 19.
Selected bambusicolous fungi; A. Astrosphaeriella stellata (HHUF
28494); B. Astrosphaeriella aggregata (HHUF 28232); C–D.
Kalmusia scabrispora (HHUF 28608); E–F. Katumotoa
bambusicola (culture KT 1517a); G–H. Massarina
arundinariae (HHUF 30014); I. Ophiosphaerella sasicola (HHUF
29443); J. Phaeosphaeria brevispora (HHUF 30016); K.
Phaeosphaeria sp. (HHUF 30017); L–M. Roussoella
hysterioides (L from HHUF 29217; M from culture KT 1651); N–P.
Roussoellopsis tosaensis (N–O from HHUF 29234; P from culture
KT 1659); Q. Versicolorisporium triseptatum (HHUF 28815); A–B.
Ascomata on host surface; C. Ascomata in longitudinal section; D, G,
I–J, N. Asci; E–F, H, K–L, O. Ascospores; M, P–Q.
Conidia. Scale bars: A–B = 500 μm; C = 200 μm; D–Q = 20
μm.
Kalmusia (Fig.
19C–D): One species of the genus, Kalmusia
scabrispora (Tanaka ), was used for phylogenetic analyses. This fungus was
originally described as a species of Leptosphaeria by Teng
(1934) and was later
transferred to Massariosphaeria by Shoemaker & Babcock
(1989). The phylogenetic tree
based on the SSU+LSU nrDNA sequences in this study did not accept these two
classifications, although we could analyse only SSU sequences for the type
species of the latter genus (M. phaeospora). It is uncertain whether
the species belong to Kalmusia from a molecular perspective, because
there are no sequence data available for other Kalmusia species. The
n class="Disease">genus Kalmusia, typified by K. ebuli, has been assigned to
the Montagnulaceae (Barr
2001), and the clypeate ascomata
(Fig. 19C) and asci with a
long stipe (Fig. 19D) of
K. scabrispora fit well in the family.
Katumotoa (Fig.
19E–F): The monotypic genus Katumotoa, based on
K. bambusicola, is characterised by apiosporous ascospores provided
with n class="Disease">bipolar enlarged sheath (Fig.
19E–F). Based on morphological features of the species, such
as immersed perithecioid ascomata, thin ascomatal wall composed of small
pseudoparenchymatous cells, cellular pseudoparaphyses, and fissitunicate asci,
Katumotoa has been tentatively assigned to Phaeosphaeriaceae
(Tanaka & Harada 2005b).
However, Katumotoa did not group within Phaeosphaeria, and
formed a clade with Ophiosphaerella sasicola, another bambusicolous
fungus (Figs 16,
19I). This clade was sister to
Massaria platani (Massariaceae) but the affinity of these
taxa was insufficiently supported (<50 % BS).
Massarina (Fig.
19G–H): Several species in this genus (e.g. n class="Species">M. alpina,
M. pustulata, M. bambusina) have been recorded from bamboo
(Eriksson & Yue 1998,
Tanaka & Harada 2003b),
but there is no sequence data for most of them. In this study, M.
arundinariae, which has been accepted as Massarina
(Aptroot 1998) but was later
transferred to Lophiostoma (Hyde
), was used for the analyses. All
phylogenetic analyses revealed that placement of this taxon in either
Massarina or Lophiostoma was not suitable
(Fig. 16). The species grouped
with the Verruculina-Testudinaceae clade, and they were
isolated from a core member of Pleosporales in the MP tree or were
positioned as a sister group of Tetraplosphaeriaceae in the NJ tree.
In the analyses of Pleosporales using sequences from nrDNA,
TEF1 and RPB2 in this volume
(Zhang ), this species is treated as a Lophiotrema.
Phylogenetic re-evaluation of the generic placement of other
Massarina species from bamboo would be required, because recent
molecular studies on the genus suggest a considerable polyphyly of
Massarina s. l. (Kodsueb , Zhang ).
Ophiosphaerella (Fig.
19I): n class="Species">Ophiosphaerella sasicola deviated from the
Phaeosphaeriaceae clade including Ophiosphaerella or
Phaeosphaeria, genera that previously accommodated the species
(Nagasawa & Otani 1977,
Shoemaker & Babcock
1989). The multi-septated scolecospores
(Fig. 19I) found in O.
sasicola might suggest an affinity with species of Cochliobolus
(Pleosporaceae), but this relationship was not supported
(Fig. 16). Ophiosphaerella
sasicola formed a monophyletic clade with K. bambusicola
supported by strong statistical values (>96 % BS, 1.00 PP;
Fig. 16), although there is no
morphological similarity between the taxa. Most probably, a new genus should
be established to accommodate this species.
Phaeosphaeria (Fig.
19J–K): Two species of n class="Species">Phaeosphaeria on bamboo,
P. brevispora and Phaeosphaeria sp., were examined in our
analyses, but they did not locate to Phaeosphaeria or
Phaeosphaeriaceae. The separation of P. brevispora from the
Phaeosphaeria clade might be due to morphological heterogeneity of
this species among the genus, such as gregarious ascomata with clypei and
clavate asci with a relatively long stipe
(Fig. 19J;
Tanaka & Harada 2004).
These morphological features of the species are similar to those of
Kalmusia scabrispora (Fig.
19C–D), although the relationships between the taxa were not
supported according to the molecular phylogeny in this study. While
Phaeosphaeria sp. [Fig.
19K; the same species reported by Tanaka & Harada
(2004) as
Phaeosphaeria sp.] shares several characters with
Phaeosphaeria on various monocots
(Shoemaker & Babcock
1989). This might indicate that fungal species on bamboo are a
peculiar lineage and do not belong to existing genera from other host plants,
even though they have morphological similarities with the genera. Molecular
phylogenetic studies of other Phaeosphaeria species described from
bamboo (e.g. P. bambusae) should be conducted to confirm this
expectation.
Roussoella (Fig.
19L–M): n class="Species">Roussoella is characterised by gregarious,
clypeate ascomata, trabeculate pseudoparaphyses embedded in a gel matrix,
bitunicate asci without obvious fissitunicate dehiscence, and brown, 1-septate
ascospores with distinctive wall ornamentation
(Fig. 19L;
Hyde ).
This genus has traditionally been considered as a member of
Amphisphaeriaceae (Xylariales) because of the
misinterpretation of the asci as unitunicate with IKI ± apical rings
(Aptroot 1995a), and the
presence of heterogenous element in the genus, now treated as
Arecophila (Hyde
1996). The genus, typified by R. hysterioides, is
currently placed in Didymosphaeriaceae
(Ju ,
Lumbsch & Huhndorf 2007),
although the validity of this classification has not been assessed in previous
phylogenetic studies (Kang , Verkley ). Roussoella include more than 11 species
(Hyde 1997,
Hyde ,
Zhou )
and most of them are known from bamboo. Four isolates of Roussoella
used in our analyses did not cluster with members of
Didymosphaeriaceae, such as Didymosphaeria futilis in the
LSU tree (data not shown) or Verruculina enalia, and formed a
strongly supported clade (99 % BS, 1.00 PP) with Roussoellopsis and
Arthopyrenia salicis (Fig.
16). This result might suggest that Roussoella belongs to
Arthopyreniaceae, but this relationship is not fully resolved because
of the morphological differences between both taxa. Many of the characters
found in Arthopyreniaceae, e.g. lichenised or non-lichenised nature,
hemispherical ascomata with wall sometimes staining green by KOH, cellular
pseudoparaphyses, fissitunicate asci, and mostly hyaline ascospores
(Eriksson 1981,
Cannon & Kirk 2007), are
significantly different from those of Roussoella. Our results further
suggest that Roussoella is not a monophyletic genus, but additional
evidence would be necessary before taxonomic revisions of the genus can be
proposed.
Selected bambusicolous fungi; A. Astrosphaeriella stellata (HHUF
28494); B. Astrosphaeriella aggregata (HHUF 28232); C–D.
Kalmusia scabrispora (HHUF 28608); E–F. Katumotoa
bambusicola (culture KT 1517a); G–H. Massarina
arundinariae (HHUF 30014); I. Ophiosphaerella sasicola (HHUF
29443); J. Phaeosphaeria brevispora (HHUF 30016); K.
Phaeosphaeria sp. (HHUF 30017); L–M. Roussoella
hysterioides (L from HHUF 29217; M from culture KT 1651); N–P.
Roussoellopsis tosaensis (N–O from HHUF 29234; P from culture
KT 1659); Q. Versicolorisporium triseptatum (HHUF 28815); A–B.
Ascomata on host surface; C. Ascomata in longitudinal section; D, G,
I–J, N. Asci; E–F, H, K–L, O. Ascospores; M, P–Q.
Conidia. Scale bars: A–B = 500 μm; C = 200 μm; D–Q = 20
μm.Roussoellopsis (Fig.
19N–P): Ascomata of this genus are extremely similar to
those found in n class="Species">Roussoella, but Roussoellopsis species have
clavate asci and large-sized (ca. 28–66 × 10–17
μm) fusiform ascospores strongly constricted at the submedian septum
(Fig. 19N–O;
Hino 1961,
Hino & Katumoto 1965). All
three species in Roussoellopsis have been considered to belong to
Astrosphaeriella or Roussoella on the basis of their
original descriptions (Aptroot
1995b). However, two isolates of Roussoellopsis appeared
in the basal lineage of the main families in Pleosporales and far
away from Astrosphaeriella clade in this study
(Fig. 16). The transfer of
Roussoellopsis to an older genus Roussoella appears to be
reasonable from the topology, but careful consideration must be given to the
treatment. In this study, it was revealed for the first time that
Roussoellopsis tosaensis has a Melanconiopsis or
Neomelanconium-like anamorph producing annellidic conidiogenous
cells, and almost globose, black, 1-celled, thick-walled conidia (ca.
21–30 μm diam) surrounded by an entire gelatinous material
(Fig. 19P). Differences found
in anamorphs between Roussoellopsis and Rousoella having a
Cytoplea state (Fig.
19M; Hyde ) indicate that they are not congeneric.
Versicolorisporium (Fig.
19Q): It has been reported that this genus has a phylogenetic
relatedness with Arthopyrenia based on the similarity of LSU
sequences (Hatakeyama ). In the result from our study using the SSU+LSU dataset,
n class="Species">Versicolorisporium clustered as a sister taxon with the clade of
Roussoella-Roussoellopsis-Arthopyrenia
(Fig. 16), although these
relationships were supported only from the NJ analysis. Besides, the
versicolous, 3-septate conidia of Versicolorisporium
(Fig. 19Q) are quite different
from those found in anamorphs of Roussoella or
Roussoellopsis. Phylogenetic inference of this anamorphic genus could
not be elucidated at this time, but it is probable that
Versicolorisporium does not belong to the main existing families in
Pleosporales.
Monophyly of Tetraploa and T. aristata
The anamorphic genus Tetraploa is a well-known dematiaceous
hyphomycete. n class="Species">Tetraploa species mostly occur throughout the year on
leaves or stems of monocotyledons including bamboo, and also on various
dicotyledons (Ellis 1949).
Sixteen taxa have been accepted in the genus until now
(Ellis 1949,
Sharma 1978,
Arambarri ,
Rifai ,
Révay 1993,
Matsushima & Matsushima
1996, Hatakeyama , Pratibha &
Bhat 2008, Zhao ). There have been no doubt regarding the monophyly
of Tetraploa characterised by conidia that consist of a main body and
four setose appendages and that are formed from a conidiogenous cell
indistinguishable from creeping hyphae
(Hatakeyama ). However, our analyses revealed that the genus is composed
of at least two lineages, i.e. Tetraploa s. str. and
Pseudotetraploa (Figs
16,
17,
18). Several species
previously described as Tetraploa might have phylogenetic affinities
with Pseudotetraploa or might represent an additional lineage
retaining a close relationship with Tetraploa. For example, T.
opacta most likely belongs to Pseudotetraploa based on the
original description and illustration of the species
(Zhao ).
Tetraploa abortiva (Arambarri
) and T. setifera
(Révay 1993,
Markovskaja 2007) should
probably be separated from Tetraploa s. str. owing to their unusual
features such as conidial body composed of three columns or hyaline
appendages. Results from our analyses indicate that the genus
Tetraploa should be restricted to species with conidial features
similar to that of T. aristata and T. ellisii.
Interestingly, monophyly of T. aristata, the type species of the
genus (Berkeley & Broome
1850), was also rejected in this study. n class="Species">Tetraploa
aristata, the most well-known species in this genus, has been considered
to have a wide geographical distribution
(Ellis 1949). It has been
recorded on more than 120 plant species
(Farr & Rossman 2009), in
particular on senescent culms of Gramineae (e.g. Pennisetum,
Phragmites, Miscanthus) and Cyperaceae (e.g.
Schoenoplectus) as a major saprophytic fungus
(Wong & Hyde 2001).
Moreover, there are several reports of the species as “facultative
aquatic hyphomycete” (Kirk
1969, Descals & Moralejo
2001) or “terrestrial-aquatic hyphomycete”
(Ando 1992,
Goh & Hyde 1996), as an
air-borne fungus (Sreeramulu &
Ramalingam 1962, Tseng &
Chen 1982, Green ), and sometimes as a human pathogen causing
keratomycosis or phaeohyphomycotic cysts
(Markham ). Traditionally, T. aristata has been believed to be
a single species having high ecological diversity. However, the
circumscription of T. aristata would be problematic because four
isolates identified morphologically as T. aristata or
Tetraploa cf. aristata (KT 1682, 1684, 1906, and
CBS 996.70) showed
low sequence similarities with each other
(Fig. 16). Probably, this
species-complex can likely be separated into several species based on minute
morphological differences, e.g. dimension and degree of ornamentation
of conidial body and length of setose appendages. Therefore, morphological
re-assessment of T. aristata s. l.
(Ellis 1949) based on the type
specimen of T. aristata (Berkeley
& Broome 1850) would be required. Among the 16 species in
Tetraploa, only one species, T. aristata, is known to have a
Massarina teleomorph of pleosporalean ascomycete
(Scheuer 1991), but the
identification of this anamorphic state should be reevaluated in the
future.
Generic placement of ascomycetes having Tetraploa
anamorphs
Although the teleomorphic fungus of “T. aristata”
found on Carex by Scheuer
(1991) has been assigned to
the genera n class="Species">Massarina (Scheuer
1991, Aptroot 1998)
or Lophiostoma (Hyde ), our analyses revealed that these generic
placements are inappropriate. These two genera are placed in
Massarinaceae and Lohiostomataceae, respectively
(Lumbsch & Huhndorf 2007).
Massarinaceae seems to be poorly defined family in view of
morphological aspects, but the type species of Massarina (M.
eburnea) has phylogenetic relationships with Aquaticheirospora
(Kodsueb ), Helminthosporium (Oliver et al. 2000),
Saccharicola (Eriksson &
Hawksworth 2003). On the other hand, Lophiostoma
characterised by the slit-like ostiole of ascomata is a well-defined genus
because several taxa including the type species of this genus formed a family
Lophiostomataceae as a sister group of Sporormiaceae
(Fig. 16; see also
Tanaka & Hosoya 2008).
Because six isolates of Tetraploa s. str. with or without teleomorphs
did not cluster with Massarinaceae or Lophiostomataceae
(Fig. 16), a new genus,
Tetraplosphaeria, was introduced for this lineage producing
Tetraploa anamorphs as a common feature. In the protologue of M.
tetraploa (anam.: T. aristata), Scheuer
(1991) noted the morphological
affinities of this species with several genera, such as Massarina,
Keissleriella, Lophiostoma, Lophiotrema, and Massariosphaeria.
All of them belong to a core group of Pleosporales, a clade with
strong support values (97 % BS, 1.00 PP), ranging from Phaeosphaeria
brevispora to Roussoella hysterioides in
Fig. 16.
Tetraplosphaeria having Tetraploa anamorphs s. str.
formed a single clade with four other genera (Triplosphaeria,
Polyplosphaeria, Pseudotetraploa and Quadricrura) having
Tetraploa-like anamorphs, and this new lineage
(Tetraplosphaeriaceae) deviated from a core group of
Pleosporales, although it has characteristic features of the order,
i.e. Pleospora-type centrum
(Luttrell 1973). The five
genera in Tetraplosphaeriaceae are clearly separated based on their
anamorphs (Figs 16,
17,
18). All these results suggest
that morphology of anamorphs is a good predictor of phylogenetic relationships
at the familial and genus levels, rather than their teleomorphs. Similar
observations about the significance of anamorphic characters have been
reported for Pleosporaceae in Dothideomycetes
(Kodsueb )
and for Chaetosphaeriaceae in Sordariomycetes
(Réblová 2000,
2006,
Réblová & Seifert
2007). However, the usefulness of anamorphic morphologies for
species identification might be limited as in the case of Tetraploa
aristata s. l. Similarly, Triplosphaeria species have relatively
few morphological differences in their anamorphs, but significant differences
in their teleomorphs, especially in their ascospores.
Relationshiphs between genera in Tetraplosphaeriaceae
Tetraplosphaeriaceae was introduced to accommodate five new genera
producing conidia with setose appendages. The monophyly of this family based
on the SSU+LSU analyses was supported by NJ (86 % BS) and Bayesian (1.00 PP)
trees, but not by the MP tree (54 % BS). Furthermore, the relationships of
n class="Species">Tetraplosphaeriaceae with other existing families were poorly
resolved, since the topologies were incongruent according to the different
analyses. Further phylogenetic evidence from an additional dataset, such as
sequences from the second largest RNA polymerase II subunit (RPB2)
would provide useful information to understand the phylogenetic relatedness of
the new family among the pleosporalean fungi
(Schoch ,
Wang ).
To clarify intergeneric relationships of five genera in
Tetraplosphaeriaceae, analyses using ITS, TEF, BT, and a combined
dataset of these sequences were also conducted in this study. The branching
patterns and monophyletic status of the five genera were slightly different
according to each individual dataset and the intergeneric relationship could
not be resolved in these analyses (Fig.
17A–C), but most likely and reliable phylogenies were
obtained from analyses of the combined dataset (ITS+TEF+BT;
Fig. 18). The result suggests
that Tetraplosphaeria with anamorphs Tetraploa s. str. is an
ancestral lineage within this family. Species in Tetraplosphaeria
appear to have wide host selectivity, while species in the other four genera
derived from this basal genus are restricted to bamboo as their host plants.
Pseudotetraploa is the second basal lineage in this family and was
strongly supported (1.00 PP and >99 % BS). Pseudotetraploa species
produce conidia resembling those of Tetraploa in overall morphology,
but conidia are composed of more than four columns with pseudosepta. In this
genus, a teleomorph has not been found for any of the known species.
Triplosphaeria species produce conidia with pseudosepta similar to
those of Pseudotetraploa but with a reduced number of conidial
columns and setose appendages. Most species in Triplosphaeria are
likely to be heterothallic, because they form ascomata-like structures from
single ascospore isolates but mature teleomorphs have never been observed
under culture conditions. The monophyly of Polyplosphaeria and
Quadricrura, the most terminal lineages in this family, are also
supported by their resemblance in their anamorphs. They have globose conidia
composed of internal hyphal structure and more than four setose appendages,
unlike the basal three genera having cylindrical conidia with several columns.
Probably, the ability of teleomorph formation has been lost at least three
times within this family, and anamorphs appear to have contributed greatly to
their evolution.
It is interesting that there are several microfossil records of
Tetraploa from the Palaeocene to the Holocene era
(Saxena & Sarkar 1986,
Kumaran ,
Antoine ,
Worobiec ). The oldest record of n class="Species">Tetraploa-like fossil from
Devonian deposits has been reported as an acritarch genus
Frasnacritetrus (Taugourdeau
1968), but this is regarded as a contamination by a recent
Tetraploa (Worobiec ). On account of the presence of Tetraploa
fossils from the late Miocene accompanied by pollen grains of a bamboo
(Graminidites bambusoides) and abundant freshwater phytoplanktons, it
has been considered that the Tetraploa species could grow on G.
bambusoides, a presumable origin of bamboo, in swamp forests
(Worobiec ). A more complete fossil of Tetraploa as well as the
other four genera in Tetraplosphaeriaceae would contribute to a
better understanding of the evolutionary relationships within this family.
Outlook for further research
Tetraplosphaeriaceae was established for n class="Species">Massarina-like
ascomycetes with conidial state similar to Tetraploa, morphologically
most strongly supported by the common character of their anamorphs. Although
application of an anamorphic phenotype for fungal classification is currently
insufficient, our results suggest that anamorphs are good indicators of
phylogenetic relationship at interfamilial or intergeneric levels. There are
several anamorphic genera, e.g. Bioconiosporium
(Ellis 1976,
Narayan & Kamal 1986),
Piricauda (Mercado Sierra ) and Piricaudilium
(Holubová-Jechová
1988), having conidia similar to those of
Tetraplosphaeriaceae. Their morphological resemblance, however, is
possibly the result of convergence. The characteristic morphologies of
Tetraploa, i.e. “tetraradiate” or
“staurosporous” conidia and conidiogenous cells without
conspicuous conidiophores, have been interpreted as a means of adaptation to
small amounts of terrestrial water films. Namely, they need to possess water
around the appendaged conidium for as long as possible to increase the
possibility of germination, and they need to produce their conidia quickly and
directly from conidiogenous cells without formation of conidiophores due to
limitations of water resources on terrestrial host plants
(Bandoni 1972,
Ando 1992,
Goh & Hyde 1996). There
are many examples about the convergent evolution of anamorphic morphology
resulting in adaptation to aquatic environments
(Belliveau & Bärlocher
2005, Campbell , Tsui & Berbee
2006, Tsui ). Therefore, molecular phylogenetic studies would be required
to clarify the affinities between aforementioned dematiaceous hyphomycetes and
Tetraplosphaeriaceae.
Bamboo is broadly divided into two tribes, Bambuseae (woody
bamboos) and Olyreae (herbaceous bamboos). The former is a major
group, which includes 67 genera in nine subtribes
(Das ). In
this study, woody bamboos belonging to only four genera in two subtribes,
Arundinariinae (n class="Species">Pleioblastus and Sasa) and
Shibataeinae (Chimonobambusa and Phyllostachys),
were examined as host plants of bambusicolous fungi in Japan. Nevertheless,
many novel fungal taxa were obtained from a limited area. It can be expected
that there exists much more diverse Dothideomycetes on herbaceous
bamboos and on the seven other subtribes of woody bamboos. In particular, we
believe, a lineage referred to as “Neotropical woody bamboos”
should receive more attention for taxonomic investigation of fungi. This
bamboo group consisting of three subtribes, Arthrostylidiinae,
Chusqueinae and Guaduinae, is distributed in Central and South
America (Sungkaew ), but our knowledge of bambusicolous fungi from these regions
is still limited. Even though fundamental taxonomic studies are well advanced
on this group, phylogenetic decisions based on molecular evidence would be
required because bambusicolous fungi have the tendency to constitute an
independent clade, deviating from existing families or genera on other host
plants, even though they have morphological similarities with those known
fungal groups, as was indicated in this study.
Authors: Johannes de Gruyter; Maikel M Aveskamp; Joyce H C Woudenberg; Gerard J M Verkley; Johannes Z Groenewald; Pedro W Crous Journal: Mycol Res Date: 2009-01-18
Authors: Rampai Kodsueb; Vijaykrishna Dhanasekaran; André Aptroot; Saisamorn Lumyong; Eric H C McKenzie; Kevin D Hyde; Rajesh Jeewon Journal: Mycologia Date: 2006 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Y Zhang; C L Schoch; J Fournier; P W Crous; J de Gruyter; J H C Woudenberg; K Hirayama; K Tanaka; S B Pointing; J W Spatafora; K D Hyde Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2009 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: J D P Bezerra; M G S Santos; V M Svedese; D M M Lima; M J S Fernandes; L M Paiva; C M Souza-Motta Journal: World J Microbiol Biotechnol Date: 2012-01-08 Impact factor: 3.312
Authors: K Tanaka; K Hirayama; H Yonezawa; G Sato; A Toriyabe; H Kudo; A Hashimoto; M Matsumura; Y Harada; Y Kurihara; T Shirouzu; T Hosoya Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: P W Crous; D A Cowan; G Maggs-Kölling; N Yilmaz; R Thangavel; M J Wingfield; M E Noordeloos; B Dima; T E Brandrud; G M Jansen; O V Morozova; J Vila; R G Shivas; Y P Tan; S Bishop-Hurley; E Lacey; T S Marney; E Larsson; G Le Floch; L Lombard; P Nodet; V Hubka; P Alvarado; A Berraf-Tebbal; J D Reyes; G Delgado; A Eichmeier; J B Jordal; A V Kachalkin; A Kubátová; J G Maciá-Vicente; E F Malysheva; V Papp; K C Rajeshkumar; A Sharma; M Spetik; D Szabóová; M A Tomashevskaya; J A Abad; Z G Abad; A V Alexandrova; G Anand; F Arenas; N Ashtekar; S Balashov; Á Bañares; R Baroncelli; I Bera; A Yu Biketova; C L Blomquist; T Boekhout; D Boertmann; T M Bulyonkova; T I Burgess; A J Carnegie; J F Cobo-Diaz; G Corriol; J H Cunnington; M O da Cruz; U Damm; N Davoodian; A L C M de A Santiago; J Dearnaley; L W S de Freitas; K Dhileepan; R Dimitrov; S Di Piazza; S Fatima; F Fuljer; H Galera; A Ghosh; A Giraldo; A M Glushakova; M Gorczak; D E Gouliamova; D Gramaje; M Groenewald; C K Gunsch; A Gutiérrez; D Holdom; J Houbraken; A B Ismailov; Ł Istel; T Iturriaga; M Jeppson; Ž Jurjević; L B Kalinina; V I Kapitonov; I Kautmanová; A N Khalid; M Kiran; L Kiss; Á Kovács; D Kurose; I Kušan; S Lad; T Læssøe; H B Lee; J J Luangsa-Ard; M Lynch; A E Mahamedi; V F Malysheva; A Mateos; N Matočec; A Mešić; A N Miller; S Mongkolsamrit; G Moreno; A Morte; R Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa; A Naseer; A Navarro-Ródenas; T T T Nguyen; W Noisripoom; J E Ntandu; J Nuytinck; V Ostrý; T A Pankratov; J Pawłowska; J Pecenka; T H G Pham; A Polhorský; A Pošta; D B Raudabaugh; K Reschke; A Rodríguez; M Romero; S Rooney-Latham; J Roux; M Sandoval-Denis; M Th Smith; T V Steinrucken; T Y Svetasheva; Z Tkalčec; E J van der Linde; M V D Vegte; J Vauras; A Verbeken; C M Visagie; J S Vitelli; S V Volobuev; A Weill; M Wrzosek; I V Zmitrovich; E A Zvyagina; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 11.658
Authors: C L Schoch; P W Crous; J Z Groenewald; E W A Boehm; T I Burgess; J de Gruyter; G S de Hoog; L J Dixon; M Grube; C Gueidan; Y Harada; S Hatakeyama; K Hirayama; T Hosoya; S M Huhndorf; K D Hyde; E B G Jones; J Kohlmeyer; A Kruys; Y M Li; R Lücking; H T Lumbsch; L Marvanová; J S Mbatchou; A H McVay; A N Miller; G K Mugambi; L Muggia; M P Nelsen; P Nelson; C A Owensby; A J L Phillips; S Phongpaichit; S B Pointing; V Pujade-Renaud; H A Raja; E Rivas Plata; B Robbertse; C Ruibal; J Sakayaroj; T Sano; L Selbmann; C A Shearer; T Shirouzu; B Slippers; S Suetrong; K Tanaka; B Volkmann-Kohlmeyer; M J Wingfield; A R Wood; J H C Woudenberg; H Yonezawa; Y Zhang; J W Spatafora Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2009 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: Nalin N Wijayawardene; Pedro W Crous; Paul M Kirk; David L Hawksworth; Saranyaphat Boonmee; Uwe Braun; Dong-Qin Dai; Melvina J D'souza; Paul Diederich; Asha Dissanayake; Mingkhuan Doilom; Singang Hongsanan; E B Gareth Jones; Johannes Z Groenewald; Ruvishika Jayawardena; James D Lawrey; Jian-Kui Liu; Robert Lücking; Hugo Madrid; Dimuthu S Manamgoda; Lucia Muggia; Matthew P Nelsen; Rungtiwa Phookamsak; Satinee Suetrong; Kazuaki Tanaka; Kasun M Thambugala; Dhanushka N Wanasinghe; Saowanee Wikee; Ying Zhang; André Aptroot; H A Ariyawansa; Ali H Bahkali; D Jayarama Bhat; Cécile Gueidan; Putarak Chomnunti; G Sybren De Hoog; Kerry Knudsen; Wen-Jing Li; Eric H C McKenzie; Andrew N Miller; Alan J L Phillips; Marcin Piątek; Huzefa A Raja; Roger S Shivas; Bernad Slippers; Joanne E Taylor; Qing Tian; Yong Wang; Joyce H C Woudenberg; Lei Cai; Walter M Jaklitsch; Kevin D Hyde Journal: Fungal Divers Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 20.372
Authors: J de Gruyter; J H C Woudenberg; M M Aveskamp; G J M Verkley; J Z Groenewald; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2013-06-30 Impact factor: 16.097