Literature DB >> 20168129

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 446: array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis.

.   

Abstract

The widespread use of array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)for the diagnosis of genomic rearrangements in children with idiopathic mental retardation,developmental delay, and multiple congenital anomalies has spurred interest in applying array CGH technology to prenatal diagnosis. The use of array CGH technology in prenatal diagnosis is currently limited by several factors, including the inability to detect balanced chromosomal rearrangements, the detection of copy number variations of uncertain clinical significance, and significantly higher costs than conventional karyotype analysis. Although array CGH has distinct advantages over classic cytogenetics in certain applications, the technology is not currently a replacement for classic cytogenetics in prenatal diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20168129     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33cad

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  33 in total

Review 1.  From prenatal genomic diagnosis to fetal personalized medicine: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Suzanna G M Frints; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Genomics and perinatal care.

Authors:  Joann Bodurtha; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The future of prenatal cytogenetic diagnostics: a personal perspective.

Authors:  Charles Lee
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: post-genomic developments.

Authors:  Sinuhe Hahn; Laird G Jackson; Bernhard G Zimmermann
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 7.  Recent advances in the prenatal interrogation of the human fetal genome.

Authors:  Lisa Hui; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorentino; Stefania Napoletano; Fiorina Caiazzo; Mariateresa Sessa; Sara Bono; Letizia Spizzichino; Anthony Gordon; Andrea Nuccitelli; Giuseppe Rizzo; Marina Baldi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Clinical diagnosis by whole-genome sequencing of a prenatal sample.

Authors:  Michael E Talkowski; Zehra Ordulu; Vamsee Pillalamarri; Carol B Benson; Ian Blumenthal; Susan Connolly; Carrie Hanscom; Naveed Hussain; Shahrin Pereira; Jonathan Picker; Jill A Rosenfeld; Lisa G Shaffer; Louise E Wilkins-Haug; James F Gusella; Cynthia C Morton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  22q11.2 deletions in patients with conotruncal defects: data from 1,610 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Philip J Lupo; Jennifer Garbarini; Stacy Woyciechowski; Sharon Edman; Beverly S Emanuel; Laura E Mitchell; Elizabeth Goldmuntz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.