Literature DB >> 20167178

Individuals achieve more accurate results with meters that are codeless and employ dynamic electrochemistry.

Anoop Rao1, Meg Wiley, Sridhar Iyengar, Dan Nadeau, Julie Carnevale.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that controlling blood glucose can reduce the onset and progression of the long-term microvascular and neuropathic complications associated with the chronic course of diabetes mellitus. Improved glycemic control can be achieved by frequent testing combined with changes in medication, exercise, and diet. Technological advancements have enabled improvements in analytical accuracy of meters, and this paper explores two such parameters to which that accuracy can be attributed.
METHODS: Four blood glucose monitoring systems (with or without dynamic electrochemistry algorithms, codeless or requiring coding prior to testing) were evaluated and compared with respect to their accuracy.
RESULTS: Altogether, 108 blood glucose values were obtained for each system from 54 study participants and compared with the reference values. The analysis depicted in the International Organization for Standardization table format indicates that the devices with dynamic electrochemistry and the codeless feature had the highest proportion of acceptable results overall (System A, 101/103). Results were significant when compared at the 10% bias level with meters that were codeless and utilized static electrochemistry (p = .017) or systems that had static electrochemistry but needed coding (p = .008).
CONCLUSIONS: Analytical performance of these blood glucose meters differed significantly depending on their technologic features. Meters that utilized dynamic electrochemistry and did not require coding were more accurate than meters that used static electrochemistry or required coding. 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20167178      PMCID: PMC2825635          DOI: 10.1177/193229681000400118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  9 in total

1.  AADE position statement. Individualization of diabetes self-management education.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.140

2.  American Diabetes Association: clinical practice recommendations 1996.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Quality specifications for glucose meters: assessment by simulation modeling of errors in insulin dose.

Authors:  J C Boyd; D E Bruns
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Miscoding and other user errors: importance of ongoing education for proper blood glucose monitoring procedures.

Authors:  Linda E Schrock
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07

5.  Improving the quality of self-monitoring blood glucose measurement: a study in reducing calibration errors.

Authors:  John M Baum; Nanette M Monhaut; Donald R Parker; Christopher P Price
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Identifying variables associated with inaccurate self-monitoring of blood glucose: proposed guidelines to improve accuracy.

Authors:  R Bergenstal; J Pearson; G S Cembrowski; D Bina; J Davidson; S List
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.140

7.  Significant insulin dose errors may occur if blood glucose results are obtained from miscoded meters.

Authors:  Charles H Raine; Linda E Schrock; Steven V Edelman; Sunder Raj D Mudaliar; Weiping Zhong; Lois J Proud; Joan Lee Parkes
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03

8.  Self-monitored blood glucose: a common pitfall.

Authors:  Charles H Raine
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 9.  Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. In 2007.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 19.112

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Dynamic electrochemistry: a step in the right direction.

Authors:  Mark J Rice
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

2.  System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Christina Schmid; Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

Review 3.  Assessing the quality of publications evaluating the accuracy of blood glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Gary H Thorpe
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 6.118

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.